直接否认还是正面否定谣言反驳?两种类型的谣言反驳效果及其心理机制

Liuying Chen, Jie Zhou, Zhefei Mao, Qiwei Li
{"title":"直接否认还是正面否定谣言反驳?两种类型的谣言反驳效果及其心理机制","authors":"Liuying Chen, Jie Zhou, Zhefei Mao, Qiwei Li","doi":"10.1145/3584816.3584843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study used a single-factor online experiment to explore the effect of the presentation of rumor rebuttal information (direct rebuttal vs. positive-negative rebuttal) on rumor credibility, and the role of emotion and depth of information processing in this process. The findings revealed that direct rebuttal significantly reduced rumor credibility to subjects when compared to no rebuttal, while no significant effect was found in positive-negative rebuttal. In addition, positive emotions, negative emotions, and the depth of information processing triggered by rumors partially mediated the effect of direct rebuttal on rumor credibility. This suggests that the method of rebuttal can significantly influence people's perceptions of rumors, and that direct denial may be more effective than rebuttal through detailed explanations containing both positive and negative information, which is practically valuable for effective rebuttals in social governance.","PeriodicalId":113982,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Direct Denial or Positive-Negative Rumor Rebuttal? The Effects of Two Types of Rumor Rebuttal and Their Psychological Mechanisms\",\"authors\":\"Liuying Chen, Jie Zhou, Zhefei Mao, Qiwei Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3584816.3584843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study used a single-factor online experiment to explore the effect of the presentation of rumor rebuttal information (direct rebuttal vs. positive-negative rebuttal) on rumor credibility, and the role of emotion and depth of information processing in this process. The findings revealed that direct rebuttal significantly reduced rumor credibility to subjects when compared to no rebuttal, while no significant effect was found in positive-negative rebuttal. In addition, positive emotions, negative emotions, and the depth of information processing triggered by rumors partially mediated the effect of direct rebuttal on rumor credibility. This suggests that the method of rebuttal can significantly influence people's perceptions of rumors, and that direct denial may be more effective than rebuttal through detailed explanations containing both positive and negative information, which is practically valuable for effective rebuttals in social governance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3584816.3584843\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2023 6th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3584816.3584843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用单因素在线实验,探讨谣言反驳信息的呈现(直接反驳与正负反驳)对谣言可信度的影响,以及情绪和信息加工深度在这一过程中的作用。研究发现,与不反驳相比,直接反驳显著降低了谣言对被试的可信度,而正面-负面反驳对被试的可信度没有显著影响。此外,谣言引发的积极情绪、消极情绪和信息加工深度在直接反驳对谣言可信度的影响中起到部分中介作用。这说明反驳的方式可以显著影响人们对谣言的认知,直接否认可能比通过包含正面和负面信息的详细解释进行反驳更有效,这对于社会治理中的有效反驳具有实际价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Direct Denial or Positive-Negative Rumor Rebuttal? The Effects of Two Types of Rumor Rebuttal and Their Psychological Mechanisms
This study used a single-factor online experiment to explore the effect of the presentation of rumor rebuttal information (direct rebuttal vs. positive-negative rebuttal) on rumor credibility, and the role of emotion and depth of information processing in this process. The findings revealed that direct rebuttal significantly reduced rumor credibility to subjects when compared to no rebuttal, while no significant effect was found in positive-negative rebuttal. In addition, positive emotions, negative emotions, and the depth of information processing triggered by rumors partially mediated the effect of direct rebuttal on rumor credibility. This suggests that the method of rebuttal can significantly influence people's perceptions of rumors, and that direct denial may be more effective than rebuttal through detailed explanations containing both positive and negative information, which is practically valuable for effective rebuttals in social governance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determining the Significance of Two Consecutive Fiscal Years of Non-Conformance Cost Data Set in Project Execution of Smart Grid Characterizing the Job-task-skill Pattern of Job Requirements with Job Advertisement Mining Usability Evaluation of Communication Tools Used as Remote Support in Machine Service Industry: A Comparison between Microsoft Teams and Skype Status-Quo of IoT in Supply Chain Management - Applications, Potentials and Challenges in Austria: Status-Quo of IoT in Supply Chain Management A Bayesian Approach to Diagnosing General Linear Profiles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1