记忆特异性训练对PTSD患者认知-情绪特异性的影响

Sara Amrolahi, A. Moradi, J. Hasani
{"title":"记忆特异性训练对PTSD患者认知-情绪特异性的影响","authors":"Sara Amrolahi, A. Moradi, J. Hasani","doi":"10.1109/COGSCI.2015.7426662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Memories of stressful or traumatic events constitute one source of unwanted emotional reactions. Patients with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) have strong emotional association with traumatic memories which results in intensity of cognitive vulnerability and symptoms. In overgeneral autobiographical memory reduction, as the severe avoidance and cognitive vulnerability decrease, the emotional cognitive distinction increases by creating an emotional exposure via reducing the connection between the emotional and event nodes. In a semi-pilot plan, 24 subjects (12 males and 12 females) with PTSD, were randomly assigned into experimental and control groups. The subjects in the former group received memory specificity training, whereas the latter were placed on a waiting list, instead. Afterwards, the scores on CED, AMT, and IES-R were collected from both groups prior to and after the intervention and during the one-month follow-up period. The data were then analyzed using multivariable variance analysis statistical tests with repeated measures. The findings were indicative of effectiveness of MEST in reducing the cognitive vulnerability and increased cognitive-emotional distinctiveness in the experimental group as compared with the control group. In case the higher levels of CED turn out to be an adaptive defense mechanism in terms of negative events that protects the individuals from repeated experience of negative emotions, both memory specificity training and autobiographical memory specification in these patients are capable of improving the cognitive-emotional distinction by reducing the trauma-related cognitive vulnerability.","PeriodicalId":371789,"journal":{"name":"2015 Sixth International Conference of Cognitive Science (ICCS)","volume":"295 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of memory specificity training for cognitive-emotional distinctiveness in patients with PTSD\",\"authors\":\"Sara Amrolahi, A. Moradi, J. Hasani\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/COGSCI.2015.7426662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Memories of stressful or traumatic events constitute one source of unwanted emotional reactions. Patients with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) have strong emotional association with traumatic memories which results in intensity of cognitive vulnerability and symptoms. In overgeneral autobiographical memory reduction, as the severe avoidance and cognitive vulnerability decrease, the emotional cognitive distinction increases by creating an emotional exposure via reducing the connection between the emotional and event nodes. In a semi-pilot plan, 24 subjects (12 males and 12 females) with PTSD, were randomly assigned into experimental and control groups. The subjects in the former group received memory specificity training, whereas the latter were placed on a waiting list, instead. Afterwards, the scores on CED, AMT, and IES-R were collected from both groups prior to and after the intervention and during the one-month follow-up period. The data were then analyzed using multivariable variance analysis statistical tests with repeated measures. The findings were indicative of effectiveness of MEST in reducing the cognitive vulnerability and increased cognitive-emotional distinctiveness in the experimental group as compared with the control group. In case the higher levels of CED turn out to be an adaptive defense mechanism in terms of negative events that protects the individuals from repeated experience of negative emotions, both memory specificity training and autobiographical memory specification in these patients are capable of improving the cognitive-emotional distinction by reducing the trauma-related cognitive vulnerability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 Sixth International Conference of Cognitive Science (ICCS)\",\"volume\":\"295 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 Sixth International Conference of Cognitive Science (ICCS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/COGSCI.2015.7426662\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Sixth International Conference of Cognitive Science (ICCS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COGSCI.2015.7426662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

压力或创伤事件的记忆构成了不必要的情绪反应的一个来源。创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者与创伤记忆有强烈的情感联系,导致认知脆弱性和症状的强度。在过度自传式记忆减少中,随着严重回避和认知脆弱性的减少,情绪认知差异通过减少情绪和事件节点之间的联系而产生情绪暴露而增加。在半试点计划中,24名PTSD患者(12男12女)被随机分为实验组和对照组。前一组的受试者接受记忆特异性训练,而后一组则被放在等候名单上。随后,收集两组患者在干预前后和1个月随访期间的CED、AMT和IES-R评分。然后使用重复测量的多变量方差分析统计检验对数据进行分析。研究结果表明,与对照组相比,MEST在降低认知脆弱性和提高认知情绪独特性方面是有效的。如果较高的CED水平是一种消极事件方面的适应性防御机制,保护个体免受消极情绪的反复体验,那么这些患者的记忆特异性训练和自传式记忆规范都可以通过降低创伤相关的认知脆弱性来改善认知-情绪区分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of memory specificity training for cognitive-emotional distinctiveness in patients with PTSD
Memories of stressful or traumatic events constitute one source of unwanted emotional reactions. Patients with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) have strong emotional association with traumatic memories which results in intensity of cognitive vulnerability and symptoms. In overgeneral autobiographical memory reduction, as the severe avoidance and cognitive vulnerability decrease, the emotional cognitive distinction increases by creating an emotional exposure via reducing the connection between the emotional and event nodes. In a semi-pilot plan, 24 subjects (12 males and 12 females) with PTSD, were randomly assigned into experimental and control groups. The subjects in the former group received memory specificity training, whereas the latter were placed on a waiting list, instead. Afterwards, the scores on CED, AMT, and IES-R were collected from both groups prior to and after the intervention and during the one-month follow-up period. The data were then analyzed using multivariable variance analysis statistical tests with repeated measures. The findings were indicative of effectiveness of MEST in reducing the cognitive vulnerability and increased cognitive-emotional distinctiveness in the experimental group as compared with the control group. In case the higher levels of CED turn out to be an adaptive defense mechanism in terms of negative events that protects the individuals from repeated experience of negative emotions, both memory specificity training and autobiographical memory specification in these patients are capable of improving the cognitive-emotional distinction by reducing the trauma-related cognitive vulnerability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implicit and explicit memory bias to negative emotional information processing in students with and without social anxiety disorder Effectiveness of memory specificity training for cognitive-emotional distinctiveness in patients with PTSD Emotional news recommender system Simulation of pair programming using multi-agent and MBTI personality model Mental representation of morality: The endorsement pattern of moral foundations among Iranians
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1