数学教师在线应用课程能力的难点

J. Halomoan
{"title":"数学教师在线应用课程能力的难点","authors":"J. Halomoan","doi":"10.53402/ajet.v1i2.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to analyze the readiness and difficulty of online learning. Survey of the Ministry of Education 2020, 58% ineffective learning process, 38% lack of guidance, 35% poor communication, 62% need internet access, 59.5% object to homework. Research aims; 1)knowing the four teacher competency readiness when online, 2) knowing the location of the difficulty of teacher competence in the online process, 3) knowing the assessment method used. Method by presenting data, reduction and conclusion. The results of the analysis, 1) The material provided does not match the initial ability standards, the books provided do not make it easier for students, the teacher has difficulties in writing symbols. Professional competency assessment is 62%, pedagogic, the teacher does not have a module as a learning aid tool, the teacher has difficulty writing integral symbols, logarithms, matrices and mathematical induction on google meet. 2) The difficulty of the teacher when operating the google meet media, the teacher does not master how to write symbols, the difficulty of proving, the difficulty of expressing the concept, the difficulty of the internet network, the difficulty of correcting the homework, the difficulty of applying the method. Rating 45% disagree with the pedagogic, the book given the concept is too difficult, the impact is that understanding does not develop and is only accepting answers from the teacher without any active interaction. 3) 60% disagree with the assessment method, the material being tested is more difficult than what is taught, as a result the learning outcomes are not as expected. In conclusion, students expect the teacher to compile their own material in the form of a module and pour models, methods, strategies and make assessment indicators in the module.","PeriodicalId":110799,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":"116 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Difficulty of Mathematics teacher competence in applying curriculum online\",\"authors\":\"J. Halomoan\",\"doi\":\"10.53402/ajet.v1i2.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aims to analyze the readiness and difficulty of online learning. Survey of the Ministry of Education 2020, 58% ineffective learning process, 38% lack of guidance, 35% poor communication, 62% need internet access, 59.5% object to homework. Research aims; 1)knowing the four teacher competency readiness when online, 2) knowing the location of the difficulty of teacher competence in the online process, 3) knowing the assessment method used. Method by presenting data, reduction and conclusion. The results of the analysis, 1) The material provided does not match the initial ability standards, the books provided do not make it easier for students, the teacher has difficulties in writing symbols. Professional competency assessment is 62%, pedagogic, the teacher does not have a module as a learning aid tool, the teacher has difficulty writing integral symbols, logarithms, matrices and mathematical induction on google meet. 2) The difficulty of the teacher when operating the google meet media, the teacher does not master how to write symbols, the difficulty of proving, the difficulty of expressing the concept, the difficulty of the internet network, the difficulty of correcting the homework, the difficulty of applying the method. Rating 45% disagree with the pedagogic, the book given the concept is too difficult, the impact is that understanding does not develop and is only accepting answers from the teacher without any active interaction. 3) 60% disagree with the assessment method, the material being tested is more difficult than what is taught, as a result the learning outcomes are not as expected. In conclusion, students expect the teacher to compile their own material in the form of a module and pour models, methods, strategies and make assessment indicators in the module.\",\"PeriodicalId\":110799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Educational Technology\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Educational Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53402/ajet.v1i2.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53402/ajet.v1i2.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

该研究旨在分析在线学习的准备程度和难度。2020年教育部调查显示,58%的学生学习过程无效,38%的学生缺乏指导,35%的学生沟通不畅,62%的学生需要上网,59.5%的学生反对家庭作业。研究目标;1)了解在线时教师胜任力的四种准备情况,2)了解在线过程中教师胜任力的难度位置,3)了解所使用的评估方法。提出数据、归纳和结论的方法。分析结果表明:1)所提供的材料不符合最初的能力标准,所提供的书籍没有使学生更容易,教师在书写符号方面有困难。专业能力评估为62%,教育学,教师没有一个模块作为学习辅助工具,教师有困难写积分符号,对数,矩阵和数学归纳法在谷歌满足。2)教师在操作google meet media时的困难,教师不掌握如何写符号,证明的困难,表达概念的困难,互联网网络的困难,批改作业的困难,应用方法的困难。45%的人不同意教师,书中给出的概念太难了,影响是理解没有发展,只接受老师的答案,没有任何积极的互动。3) 60%的人不同意评估方法,测试的材料比教的更难,导致学习效果不如预期。综上所述,学生希望教师以模块的形式编写自己的材料,并在模块中注入模型、方法、策略和制定评估指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Difficulty of Mathematics teacher competence in applying curriculum online
The study aims to analyze the readiness and difficulty of online learning. Survey of the Ministry of Education 2020, 58% ineffective learning process, 38% lack of guidance, 35% poor communication, 62% need internet access, 59.5% object to homework. Research aims; 1)knowing the four teacher competency readiness when online, 2) knowing the location of the difficulty of teacher competence in the online process, 3) knowing the assessment method used. Method by presenting data, reduction and conclusion. The results of the analysis, 1) The material provided does not match the initial ability standards, the books provided do not make it easier for students, the teacher has difficulties in writing symbols. Professional competency assessment is 62%, pedagogic, the teacher does not have a module as a learning aid tool, the teacher has difficulty writing integral symbols, logarithms, matrices and mathematical induction on google meet. 2) The difficulty of the teacher when operating the google meet media, the teacher does not master how to write symbols, the difficulty of proving, the difficulty of expressing the concept, the difficulty of the internet network, the difficulty of correcting the homework, the difficulty of applying the method. Rating 45% disagree with the pedagogic, the book given the concept is too difficult, the impact is that understanding does not develop and is only accepting answers from the teacher without any active interaction. 3) 60% disagree with the assessment method, the material being tested is more difficult than what is taught, as a result the learning outcomes are not as expected. In conclusion, students expect the teacher to compile their own material in the form of a module and pour models, methods, strategies and make assessment indicators in the module.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Developing student worksheet (LKPD) as a problem solving to improve the critical thinking of elementary school students Developing problem based learning to improve students’ critical thinking skill in integrated thematic learning at elementary school Development of e-learning in improving student understanding of education management subjects based on cooperative learning The effect of learning opportunity factors and efficacy belief on mathematical knowledge in the teaching process Replacement of humans in the classroom by artificial Intelligence: A rhetoric
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1