{"title":"维护可维护性","authors":"M. Ramage, K. Bennett","doi":"10.1109/ICSM.1998.738519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventionally, maintainability is seen as an attribute of software; measures which aim to quantify maintainability are all expressed in terms of attributes of the source code or related documentation. Such metrics do not correspond with intuition, and fail in important ways; for example they are not used by industry in assessing lifecycle costs. Maintainability is related to the skills of the maintenance team, the tools available, the maturity of the process and so on. We propose a new model, which takes a systemic view of the maintenance process and organisation as well as the software. The changing relationships between components of the model are identified as key properties for assessing maintainability. We suggest empirical approaches which could use the model to quantify maintainability. We hope the model could be used for assessing the effect of evolution, not only in the software, but in its environment.","PeriodicalId":271895,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. International Conference on Software Maintenance (Cat. No. 98CB36272)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maintaining maintainability\",\"authors\":\"M. Ramage, K. Bennett\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSM.1998.738519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conventionally, maintainability is seen as an attribute of software; measures which aim to quantify maintainability are all expressed in terms of attributes of the source code or related documentation. Such metrics do not correspond with intuition, and fail in important ways; for example they are not used by industry in assessing lifecycle costs. Maintainability is related to the skills of the maintenance team, the tools available, the maturity of the process and so on. We propose a new model, which takes a systemic view of the maintenance process and organisation as well as the software. The changing relationships between components of the model are identified as key properties for assessing maintainability. We suggest empirical approaches which could use the model to quantify maintainability. We hope the model could be used for assessing the effect of evolution, not only in the software, but in its environment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. International Conference on Software Maintenance (Cat. No. 98CB36272)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. International Conference on Software Maintenance (Cat. No. 98CB36272)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.1998.738519\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. International Conference on Software Maintenance (Cat. No. 98CB36272)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSM.1998.738519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

传统上,可维护性被视为软件的一个属性;旨在量化可维护性的度量都是根据源代码或相关文档的属性来表达的。这样的指标并不符合直觉,而且在很多重要方面都是失败的;例如,它们不被工业用于评估生命周期成本。可维护性与维护团队的技能、可用的工具、过程的成熟度等相关。我们提出了一个新的模型,该模型对维护过程和组织以及软件进行了系统的观察。模型组件之间不断变化的关系被确定为评估可维护性的关键属性。我们建议使用经验方法来使用模型来量化可维护性。我们希望这个模型可以用来评估进化的影响,不仅是在软件中,而且在它的环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Maintaining maintainability
Conventionally, maintainability is seen as an attribute of software; measures which aim to quantify maintainability are all expressed in terms of attributes of the source code or related documentation. Such metrics do not correspond with intuition, and fail in important ways; for example they are not used by industry in assessing lifecycle costs. Maintainability is related to the skills of the maintenance team, the tools available, the maturity of the process and so on. We propose a new model, which takes a systemic view of the maintenance process and organisation as well as the software. The changing relationships between components of the model are identified as key properties for assessing maintainability. We suggest empirical approaches which could use the model to quantify maintainability. We hope the model could be used for assessing the effect of evolution, not only in the software, but in its environment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hitting the Moving Target: Trials and Tribulations of Modeling Quality in Evolving Software Systems Are COTS Products and Component Packaging Killing Software Malleability? Maintaining COTS-based Systems: Is it Possible? Evaluating software deployment languages and schema: an experience report Identifying design-code inconsistencies in object-oriented software: a case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1