{"title":"非创造性和创造性方面的知识产权在建筑和成本评估成果的边缘","authors":"G. Wojtkun","doi":"10.21005/pif.2023.53.b-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the supposition that an architectural design is, in every case, a creative act. The problem of the work as a result of creative human labour, along with its copyright-related consequences, has become a leading theme in reporting the research. The creative aspect of professional endeavours was also raised, in this case, cost assessment. All this is presented against a backdrop of a general discussion on intellectual property while also pointing to cases of legislatively futile attempts at establishing authorship.","PeriodicalId":414139,"journal":{"name":"Space&FORM","volume":"220 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NON-CREATIVE AND CREATIVE ASPECTS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ON THE MARGINS OF ARCHITECTURAL AND COST ASSESSMENT ACHIEVEMENTS\",\"authors\":\"G. Wojtkun\",\"doi\":\"10.21005/pif.2023.53.b-07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses the supposition that an architectural design is, in every case, a creative act. The problem of the work as a result of creative human labour, along with its copyright-related consequences, has become a leading theme in reporting the research. The creative aspect of professional endeavours was also raised, in this case, cost assessment. All this is presented against a backdrop of a general discussion on intellectual property while also pointing to cases of legislatively futile attempts at establishing authorship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":414139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Space&FORM\",\"volume\":\"220 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Space&FORM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21005/pif.2023.53.b-07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Space&FORM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21005/pif.2023.53.b-07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
NON-CREATIVE AND CREATIVE ASPECTS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ON THE MARGINS OF ARCHITECTURAL AND COST ASSESSMENT ACHIEVEMENTS
This paper discusses the supposition that an architectural design is, in every case, a creative act. The problem of the work as a result of creative human labour, along with its copyright-related consequences, has become a leading theme in reporting the research. The creative aspect of professional endeavours was also raised, in this case, cost assessment. All this is presented against a backdrop of a general discussion on intellectual property while also pointing to cases of legislatively futile attempts at establishing authorship.