权益证明的量子攻击与防御

A. Khalifa, Ayman M. Bahaa-Eldin, Mohamed Sobh
{"title":"权益证明的量子攻击与防御","authors":"A. Khalifa, Ayman M. Bahaa-Eldin, Mohamed Sobh","doi":"10.1109/ICCES48960.2019.9068181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Advances in both quantum computation and blockchain systems necessitate a rigid analysis for the security of blockchains in the advent of powerful quantum computers. Computational problems that are proved or believed to be intractable by classical computers are known to be attacked by well-studied quantum algorithms. Such problems are used as basis to secure blockchains and hence the security of such systems must be defended. As proof-of-work is used in early blockchains to maintain consensus, proof-of-stake was proposed to lower its high energy consumption and provide a higher network throughput. Proof-of-Stake has hence got an increasing interest, variations, implementations and enhancements whilst its quantum security defenses remained almost the same. By comparing proof-of-work to proof-of-stake, we find that the latter is more vulnerable to certain attack vectors. We suggest general defenses for quantum-resilient blockchains and thoroughly analyze post-quantum signature schemes to select an appropriate alternative to the most serious threat on conventional digital signatures.","PeriodicalId":136643,"journal":{"name":"2019 14th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantum Attacks and Defenses for Proof-of-Stake\",\"authors\":\"A. Khalifa, Ayman M. Bahaa-Eldin, Mohamed Sobh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCES48960.2019.9068181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Advances in both quantum computation and blockchain systems necessitate a rigid analysis for the security of blockchains in the advent of powerful quantum computers. Computational problems that are proved or believed to be intractable by classical computers are known to be attacked by well-studied quantum algorithms. Such problems are used as basis to secure blockchains and hence the security of such systems must be defended. As proof-of-work is used in early blockchains to maintain consensus, proof-of-stake was proposed to lower its high energy consumption and provide a higher network throughput. Proof-of-Stake has hence got an increasing interest, variations, implementations and enhancements whilst its quantum security defenses remained almost the same. By comparing proof-of-work to proof-of-stake, we find that the latter is more vulnerable to certain attack vectors. We suggest general defenses for quantum-resilient blockchains and thoroughly analyze post-quantum signature schemes to select an appropriate alternative to the most serious threat on conventional digital signatures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 14th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 14th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCES48960.2019.9068181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 14th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCES48960.2019.9068181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

量子计算和区块链系统的进步需要在强大的量子计算机出现时对区块链的安全性进行严格的分析。那些被经典计算机证明或被认为难以解决的计算问题,通常会被经过充分研究的量子算法攻克。这些问题被用作保护区块链的基础,因此必须捍卫此类系统的安全性。由于早期区块链使用工作量证明来维持共识,因此提出了权益证明来降低其高能耗并提供更高的网络吞吐量。因此,权益证明得到了越来越多的关注、变化、实现和增强,而其量子安全防御几乎保持不变。通过比较工作量证明和权益证明,我们发现后者更容易受到某些攻击向量的攻击。我们建议对量子弹性区块链进行一般防御,并彻底分析后量子签名方案,以选择对传统数字签名最严重威胁的适当替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantum Attacks and Defenses for Proof-of-Stake
Advances in both quantum computation and blockchain systems necessitate a rigid analysis for the security of blockchains in the advent of powerful quantum computers. Computational problems that are proved or believed to be intractable by classical computers are known to be attacked by well-studied quantum algorithms. Such problems are used as basis to secure blockchains and hence the security of such systems must be defended. As proof-of-work is used in early blockchains to maintain consensus, proof-of-stake was proposed to lower its high energy consumption and provide a higher network throughput. Proof-of-Stake has hence got an increasing interest, variations, implementations and enhancements whilst its quantum security defenses remained almost the same. By comparing proof-of-work to proof-of-stake, we find that the latter is more vulnerable to certain attack vectors. We suggest general defenses for quantum-resilient blockchains and thoroughly analyze post-quantum signature schemes to select an appropriate alternative to the most serious threat on conventional digital signatures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Social Networking Sites (SNS) and Digital Communication Across Nations Improving Golay Code Using Hashing Technique Alzheimer's Disease Integrated Ontology (ADIO) Session PC: Parallel and Cloud Computing Multipath Traffic Engineering for Software Defined Networking
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1