当有东西挡道:火车司机的感知参数和反应速度

Helena Wasle, Anne Goralzik, Birte Thomas-friedrich, David Schackmann, Esther Bosch
{"title":"当有东西挡道:火车司机的感知参数和反应速度","authors":"Helena Wasle, Anne Goralzik, Birte Thomas-friedrich, David Schackmann, Esther Bosch","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1004139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A challenge for automation in open track railway systems is the lack of\n safety standards for obstacle detection and benchmarks for the performance\n of automated systems. In this work, the foundation for such a benchmark was\n established with the help of two studies aimed at understanding the reaction\n time mechanisms of this task. A simulator experiment with professional train\n drivers and an online study with a larger sample of non-train-drivers were\n conducted to analyze the reaction time to obstacles along the tracks. The\n size and contrast of the obstacles, as well as driving speed and use of\n train protection systems, were varied in a within-subjects design and their\n effects on reaction time were analyzed with a linear regression model on\n log-transformed data. The results show that larger obstacles and those with\n higher contrast are detected significantly faster. Obstacles that are\n approached at a higher speed were also detected significantly faster.\n However, varying the train protection system produced ambiguous results. The\n findings from this research provide a baseline for further research on train\n driver sensory capabilities and safety standard definition for future\n automation.","PeriodicalId":231376,"journal":{"name":"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2023): Future Trends\n and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Something Is in the Way: Parameters of Perception and Reaction Speed\\n in Train Drivers\",\"authors\":\"Helena Wasle, Anne Goralzik, Birte Thomas-friedrich, David Schackmann, Esther Bosch\",\"doi\":\"10.54941/ahfe1004139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A challenge for automation in open track railway systems is the lack of\\n safety standards for obstacle detection and benchmarks for the performance\\n of automated systems. In this work, the foundation for such a benchmark was\\n established with the help of two studies aimed at understanding the reaction\\n time mechanisms of this task. A simulator experiment with professional train\\n drivers and an online study with a larger sample of non-train-drivers were\\n conducted to analyze the reaction time to obstacles along the tracks. The\\n size and contrast of the obstacles, as well as driving speed and use of\\n train protection systems, were varied in a within-subjects design and their\\n effects on reaction time were analyzed with a linear regression model on\\n log-transformed data. The results show that larger obstacles and those with\\n higher contrast are detected significantly faster. Obstacles that are\\n approached at a higher speed were also detected significantly faster.\\n However, varying the train protection system produced ambiguous results. The\\n findings from this research provide a baseline for further research on train\\n driver sensory capabilities and safety standard definition for future\\n automation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2023): Future Trends\\n and Applications\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2023): Future Trends\\n and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1004139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED 2023): Future Trends\n and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1004139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开放轨道铁路系统自动化面临的一个挑战是缺乏障碍物检测的安全标准和自动化系统性能的基准。在这项工作中,这种基准的基础是在两项旨在理解该任务的反应时间机制的研究的帮助下建立的。对专业火车司机进行了模拟实验,对非火车司机进行了更大样本的在线研究,以分析他们对轨道上障碍物的反应时间。在受试者内部设计中,改变障碍物的大小和对比度,以及驾驶速度和列车保护系统的使用,并使用对数转换数据的线性回归模型分析它们对反应时间的影响。结果表明,对较大的障碍物和对比度较高的障碍物的检测速度明显加快。以较高速度接近的障碍物也能明显更快地被探测到。然而,改变列车保护系统产生了模糊的结果。本研究结果为进一步研究列车驾驶员感知能力和未来自动化的安全标准定义提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When Something Is in the Way: Parameters of Perception and Reaction Speed in Train Drivers
A challenge for automation in open track railway systems is the lack of safety standards for obstacle detection and benchmarks for the performance of automated systems. In this work, the foundation for such a benchmark was established with the help of two studies aimed at understanding the reaction time mechanisms of this task. A simulator experiment with professional train drivers and an online study with a larger sample of non-train-drivers were conducted to analyze the reaction time to obstacles along the tracks. The size and contrast of the obstacles, as well as driving speed and use of train protection systems, were varied in a within-subjects design and their effects on reaction time were analyzed with a linear regression model on log-transformed data. The results show that larger obstacles and those with higher contrast are detected significantly faster. Obstacles that are approached at a higher speed were also detected significantly faster. However, varying the train protection system produced ambiguous results. The findings from this research provide a baseline for further research on train driver sensory capabilities and safety standard definition for future automation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What To Do When The Requirements Are Unknown? - Development of a Simulator for Excretory Care The effect of operation steps on the efficiency of human-computer interaction DJaytopia: a hybrid intelligent DJ co-remixing system Human-Centered Design for a Virtual Human led mHealth Intervention for Suicide Prevention OSH risks of health and social care workers working in clients' homes in Finland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1