Ezgi Guler, Egemen Öztürk, M. Yuksel, Timur Köse, Mustafa Harman, A. Özütemiz, Nevra Elmas
{"title":"Malign ile benign portal ven trombozunun ayrımında 3 Tesla manyetik rezonans görüntülemede difüzyon ağırlıklı görüntülemenin rolü","authors":"Ezgi Guler, Egemen Öztürk, M. Yuksel, Timur Köse, Mustafa Harman, A. Özütemiz, Nevra Elmas","doi":"10.17941/agd.839289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating malignant from benign portal vein thrombo- sis. Materials and Method: Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging examinations obtained at 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging unit be- tween January 2011 and December 2016 were reviewed retrospective-ly to identify the cases with portal vein thrombosis. Portal vein thrombosis was considered malignant if it enhanced ≥15% on arterial phase contrast-enhanced images relative to precontrast images. Moreover, the diameter of the portal vein involved with the thrombus was mea-sured, and the signal intensity of the portal vein thrombosis on diffu- sion-weighted images was recorded. The apparent diffusion coefficient values for malignant and benign portal vein thrombosis were calculated by two independent readers. Results: In this study, 23 patients with malignant portal vein thrombosis [19 men, 4 women; median age 63 years (52–83)] and 14 patients with benign portal vein thrombosis (5 men, 9 women; median age 65 years 47–82)] were identified. Statis-tically significant difference was observed in signal intensity on diffu-sion-weighted images (p < 0.05) between malignant and benign portal vein thrombosis. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient values for malignant portal vein thrombosis were significantly lower than those for benign portal vein thrombosis (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a high agreement on the calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient values (R 1 : 0.948) between the two readers. Sensitivity and specifici- ty values were both 100% for the diagnosis of malignant portal vein thrombosis when the apparent diffusion coefficient value was ≤1.4 x 10 –3 mm 2 /s. Conclusion: Thus, diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging is beneficial for the differentiation of malignant and benign portal vein thrombosis. Characterization of portal vein thrombosis using its signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images and apparent diffusion coefficient values is important in patients in whom the use of contrast media is contraindicated.","PeriodicalId":118745,"journal":{"name":"Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17941/agd.839289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:本研究的目的是评价3特斯拉磁共振弥散加权成像在鉴别门静脉血栓形成的良恶性中的应用。材料与方法:回顾性分析2011年1月至2016年12月在3台特斯拉磁共振成像仪进行的腹部磁共振成像检查,确定门静脉血栓形成病例。如果门静脉血栓形成在动脉期增强图像上相对于造影前图像增强≥15%,则认为门静脉血栓形成是恶性的。测量受累门静脉的直径,记录门静脉血栓在弥散加权图像上的信号强度。恶性和良性门静脉血栓的表观扩散系数值由两位独立的阅读者计算。结果:本组23例恶性门静脉血栓患者[男19例,女4例;中位年龄63岁(52 ~ 83岁)],良性门静脉血栓形成14例(男5例,女9例;中位年龄65岁(47-82岁)]。恶性门静脉血栓形成与良性门静脉血栓形成弥散加权像信号强度差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。恶性门静脉血栓的平均表观扩散系数值明显低于良性门静脉血栓(p < 0.05)。此外,在表观扩散系数的计算上,两种读者有很高的一致性(r1: 0.948)。当表观扩散系数≤1.4 × 10 - 3mm2 /s时,诊断门静脉恶性血栓的敏感性和特异性均为100%。结论:3特斯拉磁共振弥散加权成像有利于门静脉血栓的良恶性鉴别。门静脉血栓形成的信号在弥散加权图像上的信号强度和表观弥散系数值在使用造影剂禁忌的患者中是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Malign ile benign portal ven trombozunun ayrımında 3 Tesla manyetik rezonans görüntülemede difüzyon ağırlıklı görüntülemenin rolü
Background and Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating malignant from benign portal vein thrombo- sis. Materials and Method: Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging examinations obtained at 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging unit be- tween January 2011 and December 2016 were reviewed retrospective-ly to identify the cases with portal vein thrombosis. Portal vein thrombosis was considered malignant if it enhanced ≥15% on arterial phase contrast-enhanced images relative to precontrast images. Moreover, the diameter of the portal vein involved with the thrombus was mea-sured, and the signal intensity of the portal vein thrombosis on diffu- sion-weighted images was recorded. The apparent diffusion coefficient values for malignant and benign portal vein thrombosis were calculated by two independent readers. Results: In this study, 23 patients with malignant portal vein thrombosis [19 men, 4 women; median age 63 years (52–83)] and 14 patients with benign portal vein thrombosis (5 men, 9 women; median age 65 years 47–82)] were identified. Statis-tically significant difference was observed in signal intensity on diffu-sion-weighted images (p < 0.05) between malignant and benign portal vein thrombosis. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient values for malignant portal vein thrombosis were significantly lower than those for benign portal vein thrombosis (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a high agreement on the calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient values (R 1 : 0.948) between the two readers. Sensitivity and specifici- ty values were both 100% for the diagnosis of malignant portal vein thrombosis when the apparent diffusion coefficient value was ≤1.4 x 10 –3 mm 2 /s. Conclusion: Thus, diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging is beneficial for the differentiation of malignant and benign portal vein thrombosis. Characterization of portal vein thrombosis using its signal intensity on diffusion-weighted images and apparent diffusion coefficient values is important in patients in whom the use of contrast media is contraindicated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of large superficial duodenal epithelial neoplasia Donör graft hepatosteatozunun yetişkin canlı donör karaciğer nakli alıcılarında ameliyat sonrası komplikasyonlara etkisi Dieulafoy lezyonunda endoskopik tedavilerin zorlu seçimi İnflamatuvar barsak hastalığında değişmeyen soru: İmmünmodülatör tedavi ne kadar güvenli? Mıknatıs ile neo-anastomoz: Mıknatısı nasıl itmeli?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1