环境暴露评估的物质流模型-使用理想化示例的比较实施的四种方法的关键审查

Nikolaus A. Bornhöft, B. Nowack, L. Hilty
{"title":"环境暴露评估的物质流模型-使用理想化示例的比较实施的四种方法的关键审查","authors":"Nikolaus A. Bornhöft, B. Nowack, L. Hilty","doi":"10.5167/UZH-84883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Newly developed materials such as engineered nanomaterials are produced in increasing amounts and applied in a growing number of products. Once released to the environment, they can pose a hazard to ecosystems and human health. To assess potential risks, the exposure of the material to humans and the environment has to be determined. For many materials such as engineered nanomaterials, a quantitative measurement of environmental concentrations is not feasible. Material flow models can be used to determine these concentrations indirectly by predicting material flows in the environment. Several modelling approaches can be applied to represent existing knowledge about the flows of materials into and between environmental media or compartments and to consider the uncertainty and variability of the input parameters. In this study we evaluate four existing approaches with regard to their capabilities for indirect exposure assessment, focusing on their ability to treat uncertainty. We first explain how we preselected the four most promising modelling approaches: material flow analysis, system dynamics, material flow networks, and probabilistic material flow modelling. We then define a set of evaluation criteria based on the requirements of environmental exposure assessment and develop a simplified example system that is designed to test these criteria. Based on the comparative modelling and implementation of the example system, we discuss the capabilities and limitations of the approaches and indicate what is missing for a reliable environmental exposure prediction using material flow modelling.","PeriodicalId":294332,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Informatics for Environmental Protection","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Material Flow Modelling for Environmental Exposure Assessment - A Critical Review of Four Approaches Using the Comparative Implementation of an Idealized Example\",\"authors\":\"Nikolaus A. Bornhöft, B. Nowack, L. Hilty\",\"doi\":\"10.5167/UZH-84883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Newly developed materials such as engineered nanomaterials are produced in increasing amounts and applied in a growing number of products. Once released to the environment, they can pose a hazard to ecosystems and human health. To assess potential risks, the exposure of the material to humans and the environment has to be determined. For many materials such as engineered nanomaterials, a quantitative measurement of environmental concentrations is not feasible. Material flow models can be used to determine these concentrations indirectly by predicting material flows in the environment. Several modelling approaches can be applied to represent existing knowledge about the flows of materials into and between environmental media or compartments and to consider the uncertainty and variability of the input parameters. In this study we evaluate four existing approaches with regard to their capabilities for indirect exposure assessment, focusing on their ability to treat uncertainty. We first explain how we preselected the four most promising modelling approaches: material flow analysis, system dynamics, material flow networks, and probabilistic material flow modelling. We then define a set of evaluation criteria based on the requirements of environmental exposure assessment and develop a simplified example system that is designed to test these criteria. Based on the comparative modelling and implementation of the example system, we discuss the capabilities and limitations of the approaches and indicate what is missing for a reliable environmental exposure prediction using material flow modelling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Informatics for Environmental Protection\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Informatics for Environmental Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-84883\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Informatics for Environmental Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5167/UZH-84883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

新开发的材料,如工程纳米材料的产量越来越大,应用于越来越多的产品。一旦释放到环境中,它们就会对生态系统和人类健康造成危害。为了评估潜在风险,必须确定物质对人类和环境的暴露程度。对于许多材料,如工程纳米材料,环境浓度的定量测量是不可行的。物质流动模型可以通过预测环境中的物质流动来间接地确定这些浓度。可以采用几种建模方法来表示关于物质流入环境介质或隔间之间的流动的现有知识,并考虑输入参数的不确定性和可变性。在本研究中,我们评估了四种现有的间接暴露评估方法的能力,重点是它们处理不确定性的能力。我们首先解释了我们如何预先选择四种最有前途的建模方法:物料流分析、系统动力学、物料流网络和概率物料流建模。然后,我们根据环境暴露评估的要求定义了一套评估标准,并开发了一个简化的示例系统来测试这些标准。基于实例系统的比较建模和实现,我们讨论了这些方法的能力和局限性,并指出了使用物质流建模进行可靠的环境暴露预测所缺少的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Material Flow Modelling for Environmental Exposure Assessment - A Critical Review of Four Approaches Using the Comparative Implementation of an Idealized Example
Newly developed materials such as engineered nanomaterials are produced in increasing amounts and applied in a growing number of products. Once released to the environment, they can pose a hazard to ecosystems and human health. To assess potential risks, the exposure of the material to humans and the environment has to be determined. For many materials such as engineered nanomaterials, a quantitative measurement of environmental concentrations is not feasible. Material flow models can be used to determine these concentrations indirectly by predicting material flows in the environment. Several modelling approaches can be applied to represent existing knowledge about the flows of materials into and between environmental media or compartments and to consider the uncertainty and variability of the input parameters. In this study we evaluate four existing approaches with regard to their capabilities for indirect exposure assessment, focusing on their ability to treat uncertainty. We first explain how we preselected the four most promising modelling approaches: material flow analysis, system dynamics, material flow networks, and probabilistic material flow modelling. We then define a set of evaluation criteria based on the requirements of environmental exposure assessment and develop a simplified example system that is designed to test these criteria. Based on the comparative modelling and implementation of the example system, we discuss the capabilities and limitations of the approaches and indicate what is missing for a reliable environmental exposure prediction using material flow modelling.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimization paper production through digitalization by developing an assistance system for machine operators including quality forecast: a concept Green ICT Research and Challenges Goal-Based Automation of Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading Modelling Rebound Effects in System Dynamics Risk assessment methods of water supply system in terms of reliability and operation cost
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1