{"title":"Bolton分析法与Chu简化法计算前牙尺寸差异的比较","authors":"Syeda Shamal, S. Shaheed, J. Khan","doi":"10.21608/eos.2021.62217.1014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective of present study is to compare the accuracy of Chu’s simplified method for calculating anterior tooth size discrepancy with that of Bolton’s method. Material and methods: The study was performed on 58 dental casts of untreated orthodontic patients, which were to undergo fixed orthodontic treatment in department of Orthodontics, Rehman College of Dentistry, Peshawar, Pakistan Results: Chu’s method for determining anterior tooth size discrepancy show overestimation as compared to Bolton’s method, with an average difference of 2.33 ±1.3mm. Difference was highly significant statistically (p<0.001). Conclusion: Chu’s method cannot be an accurate clinical substitute of Bolton’s method.","PeriodicalId":305086,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between Bolton analysis and Chu’s simplified method for calculating anterior tooth size discrepancy\",\"authors\":\"Syeda Shamal, S. Shaheed, J. Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/eos.2021.62217.1014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The objective of present study is to compare the accuracy of Chu’s simplified method for calculating anterior tooth size discrepancy with that of Bolton’s method. Material and methods: The study was performed on 58 dental casts of untreated orthodontic patients, which were to undergo fixed orthodontic treatment in department of Orthodontics, Rehman College of Dentistry, Peshawar, Pakistan Results: Chu’s method for determining anterior tooth size discrepancy show overestimation as compared to Bolton’s method, with an average difference of 2.33 ±1.3mm. Difference was highly significant statistically (p<0.001). Conclusion: Chu’s method cannot be an accurate clinical substitute of Bolton’s method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/eos.2021.62217.1014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Orthodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/eos.2021.62217.1014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison between Bolton analysis and Chu’s simplified method for calculating anterior tooth size discrepancy
Objective: The objective of present study is to compare the accuracy of Chu’s simplified method for calculating anterior tooth size discrepancy with that of Bolton’s method. Material and methods: The study was performed on 58 dental casts of untreated orthodontic patients, which were to undergo fixed orthodontic treatment in department of Orthodontics, Rehman College of Dentistry, Peshawar, Pakistan Results: Chu’s method for determining anterior tooth size discrepancy show overestimation as compared to Bolton’s method, with an average difference of 2.33 ±1.3mm. Difference was highly significant statistically (p<0.001). Conclusion: Chu’s method cannot be an accurate clinical substitute of Bolton’s method.