训练口语对话系统的N-best误差模拟

Blaise Thomson, Milica Gasic, Matthew Henderson, P. Tsiakoulis, S. Young
{"title":"训练口语对话系统的N-best误差模拟","authors":"Blaise Thomson, Milica Gasic, Matthew Henderson, P. Tsiakoulis, S. Young","doi":"10.1109/SLT.2012.6424194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A recent trend in spoken dialogue research is the use of reinforcement learning to train dialogue systems in a simulated environment. Past researchers have shown that the types of errors that are simulated can have a significant effect on simulated dialogue performance. Since modern systems typically receive an N-best list of possible user utterances, it is important to be able to simulate a full N-best list of hypotheses. This paper presents a new method for simulating such errors based on logistic regression, as well as a new method for simulating the structure of N-best lists of semantics and their probabilities, based on the Dirichlet distribution. Off-line evaluations show that the new Dirichlet model results in a much closer match to the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) of the live data. Experiments also show that the logistic model gives confusions that are closer to the type of confusions observed in live situations. The hope is that these new error models will be able to improve the resulting performance of trained dialogue systems.","PeriodicalId":375378,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"N-best error simulation for training spoken dialogue systems\",\"authors\":\"Blaise Thomson, Milica Gasic, Matthew Henderson, P. Tsiakoulis, S. Young\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SLT.2012.6424194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A recent trend in spoken dialogue research is the use of reinforcement learning to train dialogue systems in a simulated environment. Past researchers have shown that the types of errors that are simulated can have a significant effect on simulated dialogue performance. Since modern systems typically receive an N-best list of possible user utterances, it is important to be able to simulate a full N-best list of hypotheses. This paper presents a new method for simulating such errors based on logistic regression, as well as a new method for simulating the structure of N-best lists of semantics and their probabilities, based on the Dirichlet distribution. Off-line evaluations show that the new Dirichlet model results in a much closer match to the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) of the live data. Experiments also show that the logistic model gives confusions that are closer to the type of confusions observed in live situations. The hope is that these new error models will be able to improve the resulting performance of trained dialogue systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SLT.2012.6424194\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SLT.2012.6424194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

口语对话研究的最新趋势是在模拟环境中使用强化学习来训练对话系统。过去的研究表明,模拟的错误类型会对模拟对话的表现产生重大影响。由于现代系统通常接收可能用户话语的n个最佳列表,因此能够模拟完整的n个最佳假设列表非常重要。本文提出了一种基于逻辑回归的模拟这种误差的新方法,以及一种基于狄利克雷分布的模拟n -最佳语义表结构及其概率的新方法。离线评估表明,新的Dirichlet模型的结果更接近于实时数据的接收机工作特性(ROC)。实验还表明,逻辑模型给出的混淆更接近于在实际情况中观察到的混淆类型。希望这些新的错误模型能够提高训练对话系统的最终性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
N-best error simulation for training spoken dialogue systems
A recent trend in spoken dialogue research is the use of reinforcement learning to train dialogue systems in a simulated environment. Past researchers have shown that the types of errors that are simulated can have a significant effect on simulated dialogue performance. Since modern systems typically receive an N-best list of possible user utterances, it is important to be able to simulate a full N-best list of hypotheses. This paper presents a new method for simulating such errors based on logistic regression, as well as a new method for simulating the structure of N-best lists of semantics and their probabilities, based on the Dirichlet distribution. Off-line evaluations show that the new Dirichlet model results in a much closer match to the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) of the live data. Experiments also show that the logistic model gives confusions that are closer to the type of confusions observed in live situations. The hope is that these new error models will be able to improve the resulting performance of trained dialogue systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Combining criteria for the detection of incorrect entries of non-native speech in the context of foreign language learning Two-layer mutually reinforced random walk for improved multi-party meeting summarization Train&align: A new online tool for automatic phonetic alignment Automatic detection and correction of syntax-based prosody annotation errors Word segmentation through cross-lingual word-to-phoneme alignment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1