{"title":"使用固定转换器的光交换结构的损耗、复杂性和成本分析","authors":"M. Savi, H. Øverby, N. Stol, C. Raffaelli","doi":"10.1109/ONDM.2012.6210178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a new wavelength converter sharing scheme for buffer-less switching fabrics, named Shared-Per-Wavelength-Pair (SPWP). In SPWP fixed wavelength converters are organized into different pools, each characterized by a fixed input and output wavelength pair. Packet contention is solved by assigning incoming packets to wavelength converter pools with proper wavelength pair. The SPWP scheme is evaluated and compared to the well-known Shared-Per-Node scheme, which employs tunable wavelength converters. A simple cost model which includes also time analysis in relation to the maturity stage of the optical components has been applied. Packet loss, complexity, and overall cost have been evaluated highlighting how the SPWP can be less expensive than or comparable to SPN in many configurations, while providing the same performance.","PeriodicalId":151401,"journal":{"name":"2012 16th International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modelling (ONDM)","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loss, complexity and cost analysis of an optical switching fabric using fixed converters\",\"authors\":\"M. Savi, H. Øverby, N. Stol, C. Raffaelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ONDM.2012.6210178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a new wavelength converter sharing scheme for buffer-less switching fabrics, named Shared-Per-Wavelength-Pair (SPWP). In SPWP fixed wavelength converters are organized into different pools, each characterized by a fixed input and output wavelength pair. Packet contention is solved by assigning incoming packets to wavelength converter pools with proper wavelength pair. The SPWP scheme is evaluated and compared to the well-known Shared-Per-Node scheme, which employs tunable wavelength converters. A simple cost model which includes also time analysis in relation to the maturity stage of the optical components has been applied. Packet loss, complexity, and overall cost have been evaluated highlighting how the SPWP can be less expensive than or comparable to SPN in many configurations, while providing the same performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 16th International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modelling (ONDM)\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 16th International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modelling (ONDM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ONDM.2012.6210178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 16th International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modelling (ONDM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ONDM.2012.6210178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
本文提出了一种新的无缓冲交换结构的波长转换器共享方案,称为每波长对共享(shared - per wavelength - pair, SPWP)。在SPWP中,固定波长转换器被组织成不同的池,每个池具有固定的输入和输出波长对。通过将入站数据包分配到具有适当波长对的波长转换池中来解决分组争用问题。对SPWP方案进行了评估,并与众所周知的采用可调谐波长转换器的每节点共享方案进行了比较。采用了一个简单的成本模型,其中还包括与光学元件成熟阶段有关的时间分析。对丢包、复杂性和总体成本进行了评估,强调了SPWP在许多配置中如何比SPN更便宜或与之相当,同时提供相同的性能。
Loss, complexity and cost analysis of an optical switching fabric using fixed converters
This paper presents a new wavelength converter sharing scheme for buffer-less switching fabrics, named Shared-Per-Wavelength-Pair (SPWP). In SPWP fixed wavelength converters are organized into different pools, each characterized by a fixed input and output wavelength pair. Packet contention is solved by assigning incoming packets to wavelength converter pools with proper wavelength pair. The SPWP scheme is evaluated and compared to the well-known Shared-Per-Node scheme, which employs tunable wavelength converters. A simple cost model which includes also time analysis in relation to the maturity stage of the optical components has been applied. Packet loss, complexity, and overall cost have been evaluated highlighting how the SPWP can be less expensive than or comparable to SPN in many configurations, while providing the same performance.