{"title":"电话交换机水冷系统与空冷系统的系统比较","authors":"J. Kolte, H. Zirath","doi":"10.1109/INTLEC.1989.88358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The authors compare three cooling systems (two airborne and one waterborne) for telephone exchanges: (1) cooling through a false floor; (2) conventional air conditioning; and (2) cooling with natural convection coils, for instance using the Ericsson cooling system ERICOOL. The waterborne natural-convection system appears to be the most advantageous. The system has the following advantages: lowest power consumption; easiest achievement of cooling reserve in case of main failure; best working environment in the switching room; greatest development potential for future electronic packaging structures with increased power densities.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":272740,"journal":{"name":"Conference Proceedings., Eleventh International Telecommunications Energy Conference","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A system comparison between water and air-borne cooling systems for telephone exchanges\",\"authors\":\"J. Kolte, H. Zirath\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INTLEC.1989.88358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The authors compare three cooling systems (two airborne and one waterborne) for telephone exchanges: (1) cooling through a false floor; (2) conventional air conditioning; and (2) cooling with natural convection coils, for instance using the Ericsson cooling system ERICOOL. The waterborne natural-convection system appears to be the most advantageous. The system has the following advantages: lowest power consumption; easiest achievement of cooling reserve in case of main failure; best working environment in the switching room; greatest development potential for future electronic packaging structures with increased power densities.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":272740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conference Proceedings., Eleventh International Telecommunications Energy Conference\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conference Proceedings., Eleventh International Telecommunications Energy Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INTLEC.1989.88358\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference Proceedings., Eleventh International Telecommunications Energy Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INTLEC.1989.88358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A system comparison between water and air-borne cooling systems for telephone exchanges
The authors compare three cooling systems (two airborne and one waterborne) for telephone exchanges: (1) cooling through a false floor; (2) conventional air conditioning; and (2) cooling with natural convection coils, for instance using the Ericsson cooling system ERICOOL. The waterborne natural-convection system appears to be the most advantageous. The system has the following advantages: lowest power consumption; easiest achievement of cooling reserve in case of main failure; best working environment in the switching room; greatest development potential for future electronic packaging structures with increased power densities.<>
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
