{"title":"创造的伦理学","authors":"Harry Berger","doi":"10.5422/fordham/9780823294237.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter takes up discussion of the complexities inherent to the debate in two major parts: first, how Protagoras’s sophistry concentrates on perpetually deferred, implicit colophons to the premises that he fails to warrant; and secondly, the chapter involves Austinian speech-act theory in Socrates’s use of the poem, concentrating more specifically on how performance colors his rhetoric in ways not readily apparent in cold recitation.","PeriodicalId":348422,"journal":{"name":"Couch City","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ethics of Etceteration\",\"authors\":\"Harry Berger\",\"doi\":\"10.5422/fordham/9780823294237.003.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter takes up discussion of the complexities inherent to the debate in two major parts: first, how Protagoras’s sophistry concentrates on perpetually deferred, implicit colophons to the premises that he fails to warrant; and secondly, the chapter involves Austinian speech-act theory in Socrates’s use of the poem, concentrating more specifically on how performance colors his rhetoric in ways not readily apparent in cold recitation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Couch City\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Couch City\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823294237.003.0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Couch City","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823294237.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This chapter takes up discussion of the complexities inherent to the debate in two major parts: first, how Protagoras’s sophistry concentrates on perpetually deferred, implicit colophons to the premises that he fails to warrant; and secondly, the chapter involves Austinian speech-act theory in Socrates’s use of the poem, concentrating more specifically on how performance colors his rhetoric in ways not readily apparent in cold recitation.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
