{"title":"电阻测量中直流的定义","authors":"N. Fletcher, M. Gotz, R. Goebel, B. Rolland","doi":"10.1109/CPEM.2014.6898572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers the problem of defining measurement conditions that approximate `DC' for resistance standards. A recent on-site comparison between the BIPM and the PTB highlighted this difficulty in dealing with Peltier heating in 1 Ω standards, but it is a general problem with a variety of causes. We aim to draw attention to this potential source of error and to open a discussion on how to mitigate the problems by improved definitions of the measurand.","PeriodicalId":256575,"journal":{"name":"29th Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements (CPEM 2014)","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the definition of DC in resistance measurements\",\"authors\":\"N. Fletcher, M. Gotz, R. Goebel, B. Rolland\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CPEM.2014.6898572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper considers the problem of defining measurement conditions that approximate `DC' for resistance standards. A recent on-site comparison between the BIPM and the PTB highlighted this difficulty in dealing with Peltier heating in 1 Ω standards, but it is a general problem with a variety of causes. We aim to draw attention to this potential source of error and to open a discussion on how to mitigate the problems by improved definitions of the measurand.\",\"PeriodicalId\":256575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"29th Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements (CPEM 2014)\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"29th Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements (CPEM 2014)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CPEM.2014.6898572\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"29th Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements (CPEM 2014)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CPEM.2014.6898572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On the definition of DC in resistance measurements
This paper considers the problem of defining measurement conditions that approximate `DC' for resistance standards. A recent on-site comparison between the BIPM and the PTB highlighted this difficulty in dealing with Peltier heating in 1 Ω standards, but it is a general problem with a variety of causes. We aim to draw attention to this potential source of error and to open a discussion on how to mitigate the problems by improved definitions of the measurand.