无凹化原则的非凹效用最大化

M. Dai, S. Kou, Shuaijie Qian, Xiangwei Wan
{"title":"无凹化原则的非凹效用最大化","authors":"M. Dai, S. Kou, Shuaijie Qian, Xiangwei Wan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3422276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problems of non-concave utility maximization appear in many areas of finance and economics, such as in behavior economics, incentive schemes, aspiration utility, and goal-reaching problems. Existing literature solves these problems using the concavification principle. We provide a framework for solving non-concave utility maximization problems, where the concavification principle may not hold and the utility functions can be discontinuous. In particular, we find that adding bounded portfolio constraints, which makes the concavification principle invalid, can significantly affect economic insights in the existing literature. Theoretically, we give a new definition of viscosity solution and show that a monotone, stable, and consistent finite difference scheme converges to the solution of the utility maximization problem.","PeriodicalId":299310,"journal":{"name":"Econometrics: Mathematical Methods & Programming eJournal","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-Concave Utility Maximization without the Concavification Principle\",\"authors\":\"M. Dai, S. Kou, Shuaijie Qian, Xiangwei Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3422276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problems of non-concave utility maximization appear in many areas of finance and economics, such as in behavior economics, incentive schemes, aspiration utility, and goal-reaching problems. Existing literature solves these problems using the concavification principle. We provide a framework for solving non-concave utility maximization problems, where the concavification principle may not hold and the utility functions can be discontinuous. In particular, we find that adding bounded portfolio constraints, which makes the concavification principle invalid, can significantly affect economic insights in the existing literature. Theoretically, we give a new definition of viscosity solution and show that a monotone, stable, and consistent finite difference scheme converges to the solution of the utility maximization problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometrics: Mathematical Methods & Programming eJournal\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometrics: Mathematical Methods & Programming eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3422276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometrics: Mathematical Methods & Programming eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3422276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

非凹效用最大化问题出现在金融学和经济学的许多领域,如行为经济学、激励机制、期望效用和目标实现问题。现有文献利用简化原理解决了这些问题。我们提供了一个解决非凹效用最大化问题的框架,其中凹化原理可能不成立,效用函数可能不连续。特别是,我们发现添加有界投资组合约束会显著影响现有文献中的经济见解,从而使隐化原理失效。从理论上给出了粘性解的新定义,并证明了单调、稳定、一致有限差分格式收敛于效用最大化问题的解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Non-Concave Utility Maximization without the Concavification Principle
The problems of non-concave utility maximization appear in many areas of finance and economics, such as in behavior economics, incentive schemes, aspiration utility, and goal-reaching problems. Existing literature solves these problems using the concavification principle. We provide a framework for solving non-concave utility maximization problems, where the concavification principle may not hold and the utility functions can be discontinuous. In particular, we find that adding bounded portfolio constraints, which makes the concavification principle invalid, can significantly affect economic insights in the existing literature. Theoretically, we give a new definition of viscosity solution and show that a monotone, stable, and consistent finite difference scheme converges to the solution of the utility maximization problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parameters Estimation of Photovoltaic Models Using a Novel Hybrid Seagull Optimization Algorithm Input Indivisibility and the Measurement Error Quadratically optimal equilibrium points of weakly potential bi-matrix games Mathematical Background of the Theory of Cycle of Money An Example for 'Weak Monotone Comparative Statics'
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1