{"title":"金融危机加剧了收入不平等吗?","authors":"C. Bodea, C. Houle, Hyunwoo Kim","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3486470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the impact of economic crises on income inequality. Important evidence has emerged that in the aftermath of crises politics becomes polarized and economists have linked this to greater differences in income due to crises. The evidence however on whether crises can be linked to divergent incomes is weak and plagued by i) the possibility of a reverse effect going from great disparity in incomes to major economic crises; ii) the persistent nature of income inequality; and iii) important measurement error in both the dependent and independent variables. We use the longest time stretch of available data on crises and types of crises (Reinhart and Rogoff 2011) and income inequality (Solt 2009), as well as General Method of Moments and Error Correction Models to more credibly tackle the complex theoretical and empirical relationship between crises and inequality. We find strong evidence that currency, banking, inflation and debt crises increase inequality, particularly in the long run.","PeriodicalId":252294,"journal":{"name":"Household Financial Planning eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Financial Crises increase Income Inequality?\",\"authors\":\"C. Bodea, C. Houle, Hyunwoo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3486470\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the impact of economic crises on income inequality. Important evidence has emerged that in the aftermath of crises politics becomes polarized and economists have linked this to greater differences in income due to crises. The evidence however on whether crises can be linked to divergent incomes is weak and plagued by i) the possibility of a reverse effect going from great disparity in incomes to major economic crises; ii) the persistent nature of income inequality; and iii) important measurement error in both the dependent and independent variables. We use the longest time stretch of available data on crises and types of crises (Reinhart and Rogoff 2011) and income inequality (Solt 2009), as well as General Method of Moments and Error Correction Models to more credibly tackle the complex theoretical and empirical relationship between crises and inequality. We find strong evidence that currency, banking, inflation and debt crises increase inequality, particularly in the long run.\",\"PeriodicalId\":252294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Household Financial Planning eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Household Financial Planning eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3486470\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Household Financial Planning eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3486470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
本文研究了经济危机对收入不平等的影响。有重要证据表明,在危机之后,政治变得两极化,经济学家将其与危机导致的收入差距扩大联系起来。然而,关于危机是否可以与收入差异联系在一起的证据很薄弱,并且受到以下问题的困扰:1)从收入巨大差距到重大经济危机的反向效应的可能性;Ii)收入不平等的持久性;iii)因变量和自变量的重要测量误差。我们使用关于危机和危机类型(Reinhart and Rogoff 2011)和收入不平等(Solt 2009)的最长时间可用数据,以及一般矩法和误差修正模型,以更可靠地解决危机与不平等之间复杂的理论和实证关系。我们发现强有力的证据表明,货币、银行、通胀和债务危机加剧了不平等,尤其是从长期来看。
This paper investigates the impact of economic crises on income inequality. Important evidence has emerged that in the aftermath of crises politics becomes polarized and economists have linked this to greater differences in income due to crises. The evidence however on whether crises can be linked to divergent incomes is weak and plagued by i) the possibility of a reverse effect going from great disparity in incomes to major economic crises; ii) the persistent nature of income inequality; and iii) important measurement error in both the dependent and independent variables. We use the longest time stretch of available data on crises and types of crises (Reinhart and Rogoff 2011) and income inequality (Solt 2009), as well as General Method of Moments and Error Correction Models to more credibly tackle the complex theoretical and empirical relationship between crises and inequality. We find strong evidence that currency, banking, inflation and debt crises increase inequality, particularly in the long run.