言论自由和选择架构:向更多社交网络的“推动”

Vinicio Salvarezza
{"title":"言论自由和选择架构:向更多社交网络的“推动”","authors":"Vinicio Salvarezza","doi":"10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article draws from the teachings of behavioral science to support the use of nudges as the preferred solution for regulating the exercise of freedom of expression on social networks, since it is in line with the prima facie preferential nature of freedom of expression and the rule of art.19 of the Marco Civil da Internet. Thus, the theoretical and normative basis for defending the regulation of choice architectures guided by network providers' algorithms is presented first. After that, some examples of promising nudges will be enunciated, compatible with the Brazilian legal system, whose use could be encouraged to reduce the circulation of fake news on networks, without prejudice to the enumeration of some of the limitations of the proposed approach.","PeriodicalId":346094,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liberdade de expressão e arquitetura de escolhas: um “empurrão” em direção a redes mais sociais\",\"authors\":\"Vinicio Salvarezza\",\"doi\":\"10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article draws from the teachings of behavioral science to support the use of nudges as the preferred solution for regulating the exercise of freedom of expression on social networks, since it is in line with the prima facie preferential nature of freedom of expression and the rule of art.19 of the Marco Civil da Internet. Thus, the theoretical and normative basis for defending the regulation of choice architectures guided by network providers' algorithms is presented first. After that, some examples of promising nudges will be enunciated, compatible with the Brazilian legal system, whose use could be encouraged to reduce the circulation of fake news on networks, without prejudice to the enumeration of some of the limitations of the proposed approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从行为科学的教导中,支持使用轻推作为规范社交网络上言论自由行使的首选解决方案,因为它符合言论自由的初步优先性质和艺术规则。19 .马尔科民事达互联网。因此,首先提出了捍卫由网络提供商算法指导的选择架构规则的理论和规范基础。在此之后,将阐述一些与巴西法律体系相一致的有希望的推动例子,可以鼓励使用这些例子来减少假新闻在网络上的传播,但不影响列举拟议方法的一些局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Liberdade de expressão e arquitetura de escolhas: um “empurrão” em direção a redes mais sociais
This article draws from the teachings of behavioral science to support the use of nudges as the preferred solution for regulating the exercise of freedom of expression on social networks, since it is in line with the prima facie preferential nature of freedom of expression and the rule of art.19 of the Marco Civil da Internet. Thus, the theoretical and normative basis for defending the regulation of choice architectures guided by network providers' algorithms is presented first. After that, some examples of promising nudges will be enunciated, compatible with the Brazilian legal system, whose use could be encouraged to reduce the circulation of fake news on networks, without prejudice to the enumeration of some of the limitations of the proposed approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Incompletude em contratos de concessão: ainda a teoria da imprevisão?* Procedimentos probatórios autônomos como instrumentos de acertamento fático e fomento ao consenso – breve análise das inovações trazidas pelo art. 381 do novo Código de Processo Civil Dever de agir e precaução: uma análise à luz da tese fixada no julgamento de constitucionalidade da MP nº 966/2020 pelo STF Direito em tempos de crise: o que as contratações públicas podem aprender com a pandemia de COVID-19 O exercício das funções da advocacia pública como atividade exclusiva dos advogados públicos efetivos: uma releitura da Proposta de Súmula Vinculante nº 18 do STF à luz dos dados publicados no 1º Diagnóstico de Advocacia Pública Municipal no Brasil (2019)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1