自适应超媒体环境下模态偏好与表现的关系:基于视觉、语言和多媒体学习模块的探索

A. Hazra, P. Patnaik, Damodar Suar
{"title":"自适应超媒体环境下模态偏好与表现的关系:基于视觉、语言和多媒体学习模块的探索","authors":"A. Hazra, P. Patnaik, Damodar Suar","doi":"10.1109/T4E.2013.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning styles theories suggest that people learn differently, an important consideration for adaptive hypermedia learning platforms. Since on such platforms, mode of delivery of course material - visual, verbal or multimedia - plays an important role, this study considers learning styles in the context of adaptive hypermedia with the aim to identify if providing material according to one's learning style enhances performance. While some studies report positive results, others find no correlation between the two. Here, we examine the efficacy of learning styles, especially the visual-verbal dimension of Felder-Silverman model, in a controlled e-learning environment by testing the effectiveness of visual, verbal as well as multimedia modules for history and engineering on 268 engineering undergraduates identified on the basis of visual, verbal and mixed orientations. Contrary to expectations, results indicated no relation between learning styles and performance in modules based on different sensory preferences. However, students did show discipline-based better performance in multimedia and visual modes than in verbal mode. They also preferred multimedia and visual modes over verbal. This corroborates earlier findings - the efficacy of learning styles remains unconfirmed.","PeriodicalId":299216,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Technology for Education (t4e 2013)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relation of Modal Preference with Performance in Adaptive Hypermedia Context: An Exploration Using Visual, Verbal and Multimedia Learning Modules\",\"authors\":\"A. Hazra, P. Patnaik, Damodar Suar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/T4E.2013.47\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Learning styles theories suggest that people learn differently, an important consideration for adaptive hypermedia learning platforms. Since on such platforms, mode of delivery of course material - visual, verbal or multimedia - plays an important role, this study considers learning styles in the context of adaptive hypermedia with the aim to identify if providing material according to one's learning style enhances performance. While some studies report positive results, others find no correlation between the two. Here, we examine the efficacy of learning styles, especially the visual-verbal dimension of Felder-Silverman model, in a controlled e-learning environment by testing the effectiveness of visual, verbal as well as multimedia modules for history and engineering on 268 engineering undergraduates identified on the basis of visual, verbal and mixed orientations. Contrary to expectations, results indicated no relation between learning styles and performance in modules based on different sensory preferences. However, students did show discipline-based better performance in multimedia and visual modes than in verbal mode. They also preferred multimedia and visual modes over verbal. This corroborates earlier findings - the efficacy of learning styles remains unconfirmed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Technology for Education (t4e 2013)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Technology for Education (t4e 2013)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2013.47\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Technology for Education (t4e 2013)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/T4E.2013.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

学习风格理论认为人们的学习方式不同,这是自适应超媒体学习平台的一个重要考虑因素。由于在这些平台上,课程材料的传递方式——视觉、口头或多媒体——起着重要作用,本研究考虑了自适应超媒体背景下的学习风格,目的是确定根据学习风格提供材料是否能提高表现。虽然一些研究报告了积极的结果,但另一些研究发现两者之间没有相关性。本研究通过对268名基于视觉、语言和混合取向的工程本科生进行历史和工程课程视觉、语言和多媒体模块的有效性测试,考察了学习风格在电子学习环境中的有效性,特别是Felder-Silverman模型的视觉语言维度。与预期相反,结果表明学习风格与基于不同感官偏好的模块的表现之间没有关系。然而,学生在多媒体和视觉模式下确实表现出比口头模式更好的基于学科的表现。他们也更喜欢多媒体和视觉模式,而不是口头的。这证实了早期的发现——学习方式的功效尚未得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relation of Modal Preference with Performance in Adaptive Hypermedia Context: An Exploration Using Visual, Verbal and Multimedia Learning Modules
Learning styles theories suggest that people learn differently, an important consideration for adaptive hypermedia learning platforms. Since on such platforms, mode of delivery of course material - visual, verbal or multimedia - plays an important role, this study considers learning styles in the context of adaptive hypermedia with the aim to identify if providing material according to one's learning style enhances performance. While some studies report positive results, others find no correlation between the two. Here, we examine the efficacy of learning styles, especially the visual-verbal dimension of Felder-Silverman model, in a controlled e-learning environment by testing the effectiveness of visual, verbal as well as multimedia modules for history and engineering on 268 engineering undergraduates identified on the basis of visual, verbal and mixed orientations. Contrary to expectations, results indicated no relation between learning styles and performance in modules based on different sensory preferences. However, students did show discipline-based better performance in multimedia and visual modes than in verbal mode. They also preferred multimedia and visual modes over verbal. This corroborates earlier findings - the efficacy of learning styles remains unconfirmed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automated Alertness and Emotion Detection for Empathic Feedback during e-Learning Learner Centered Design Approach for e-Learning Using 3D Virtual Tutors LAMP: A Framework for Large-Scale Addressing of Muddy Points Impact of Mindspark's Adaptive Logic on Student Learning Introducing Network Design to Students via a Dance Activity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1