理性交换:原子交叉链交换的激励

Janick Rueegger, Guilherme Sperb Machado
{"title":"理性交换:原子交叉链交换的激励","authors":"Janick Rueegger, Guilherme Sperb Machado","doi":"10.1109/ICBC48266.2020.9169408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protocols based on Hash Time Lock Contracts (HTLCs) show tremendous potential to enable a truly decentralized exchange of digital currencies. In contrast to traditional financial systems and centralized crypto-exchanges, HTLC protocols provide a method to trade crypto-currencies in a peer-to-peer manner. However, considering the elimination of a third-party authority, remarkable price fluctuations and the protocol’s extensive time-to-completion, involved parties might be incentivized to deviate from the protocol and cancel a trade midway. Thus, this paper analyzes the protocol’s incentive structure based on a model of rationality to further quantify its impact on potential trades, using historical exchange rates. By analyzing different crypto-currency trading pairs, this paper highlights the probabilistic nature of a typical HTLC protocol. The results show that although the protocol does not offer a guarantee for a successful trade, it is applicable in scenarios of exchange-rates with low drift, low volatility, and an optimized time-to-completion.","PeriodicalId":420845,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rational Exchange: Incentives in Atomic Cross Chain Swaps\",\"authors\":\"Janick Rueegger, Guilherme Sperb Machado\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICBC48266.2020.9169408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Protocols based on Hash Time Lock Contracts (HTLCs) show tremendous potential to enable a truly decentralized exchange of digital currencies. In contrast to traditional financial systems and centralized crypto-exchanges, HTLC protocols provide a method to trade crypto-currencies in a peer-to-peer manner. However, considering the elimination of a third-party authority, remarkable price fluctuations and the protocol’s extensive time-to-completion, involved parties might be incentivized to deviate from the protocol and cancel a trade midway. Thus, this paper analyzes the protocol’s incentive structure based on a model of rationality to further quantify its impact on potential trades, using historical exchange rates. By analyzing different crypto-currency trading pairs, this paper highlights the probabilistic nature of a typical HTLC protocol. The results show that although the protocol does not offer a guarantee for a successful trade, it is applicable in scenarios of exchange-rates with low drift, low volatility, and an optimized time-to-completion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":420845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC)\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBC48266.2020.9169408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBC48266.2020.9169408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

基于哈希时间锁定合约(htlc)的协议显示出巨大的潜力,可以实现真正去中心化的数字货币交换。与传统的金融系统和集中式加密交易不同,HTLC协议提供了一种以点对点方式交易加密货币的方法。然而,考虑到第三方权威机构的消除、价格的显著波动以及协议的漫长完成时间,相关各方可能会受到激励而偏离协议,并在中途取消交易。因此,本文基于理性模型分析协议的激励结构,利用历史汇率进一步量化其对潜在交易的影响。通过分析不同的加密货币交易对,本文强调了典型HTLC协议的概率性质。结果表明,虽然该协议不能保证交易成功,但它适用于低漂移、低波动和优化完成时间的汇率场景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rational Exchange: Incentives in Atomic Cross Chain Swaps
Protocols based on Hash Time Lock Contracts (HTLCs) show tremendous potential to enable a truly decentralized exchange of digital currencies. In contrast to traditional financial systems and centralized crypto-exchanges, HTLC protocols provide a method to trade crypto-currencies in a peer-to-peer manner. However, considering the elimination of a third-party authority, remarkable price fluctuations and the protocol’s extensive time-to-completion, involved parties might be incentivized to deviate from the protocol and cancel a trade midway. Thus, this paper analyzes the protocol’s incentive structure based on a model of rationality to further quantify its impact on potential trades, using historical exchange rates. By analyzing different crypto-currency trading pairs, this paper highlights the probabilistic nature of a typical HTLC protocol. The results show that although the protocol does not offer a guarantee for a successful trade, it is applicable in scenarios of exchange-rates with low drift, low volatility, and an optimized time-to-completion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Security and Performance of Master Node Protocol in the Bitcoin Peer-to-Peer Network Building Hybrid DApps using Blockchain Tactics -The Meta-Transaction Example FabricUnit: A Framework for Faster Execution of Unit Tests on Hyperledger Fabric Distributed Fractionalized Data Networks For Data Integrity Cross-chain Transactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1