{"title":"冒险家和宇航员:<s:1>伦马特对布莱希特的模仿?","authors":"Hart L. Wegner","doi":"10.1353/RMR.1971.0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The relationship between Dürrenmatt and Brecht is of considerable interest, not only for the individual merits of the writers involved, but also because of the often problematical relationship between teacher and student, or master and acolyte. Sooner or later each student or son has to sever the ties or stay forever in Zeus's thigh. Several perceptive essays have been written on Dürrenmatt's relation to Brecht, foremost among them Hans Mayer's \"Dürrenmatt und Brecht oder die Zurücknahme.\"1 Dürrenmatt's own remarks on this subject are rather inconclusive. To be linked to Brecht as a post-Brechtian playwright is as meaningful (or usually as meaningless) as the customary linkage established by critics of the nineteenth century between writers of that epoch and Goethe. Emil Staiger, for example, has examined the relationships of contemporary writers to their precursors (and Brecht is already a \"precursor\" only fourteen years after his death). Staiger recognizes the afemina of contemporary literary artists, yet regrets the fact that modern authors so often resort to parody in order to reduce the great writers of the past to relative harmlessness. As he puts it: Wir dürfen ihnen unsere Achtung und Bewunderung nicht versagen, selbst dann nicht, wenn sie, um sich ihr schweres Geschäft zu erleichtern, die grossen Meister der vergangenen Zeit schmähen und ihre Werke kritisch oder, was noch bedenklicher ist, in Parodien, wie sie an der Tagesordnung sind, unschädlich machen zu müssen glauben.\"2 Staiger appears to feel that the modern writer, or any writer for that matter, resorts to parody because he feels threatened. Parody does not necessarily produce this veritable emasculation, but if one follows Staiger's argumentation, it is easy to see how parody could be used and is used to render a writer of the past innocuous, not for the reading public as a whole, but for the writer himself, who may feel trapped or endangered through a literary father-son relationship. Dürrenmatt's Die Physiker reflects Brecht's Leben des Galilei in subject matter and title. Brecht's Galileo faces the choice of either intellectual and physical freedom (in Venice) or the freedom to devote his time to research, unencumbered by financial worries (in Florence). Brecht himself faced this dilemma between East and West. Möbius, the physicist/hero of Diir-","PeriodicalId":344945,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1971-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adventurers and Cosmonauts: Dürrenmatt's Parody of Brecht?\",\"authors\":\"Hart L. Wegner\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/RMR.1971.0018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The relationship between Dürrenmatt and Brecht is of considerable interest, not only for the individual merits of the writers involved, but also because of the often problematical relationship between teacher and student, or master and acolyte. Sooner or later each student or son has to sever the ties or stay forever in Zeus's thigh. Several perceptive essays have been written on Dürrenmatt's relation to Brecht, foremost among them Hans Mayer's \\\"Dürrenmatt und Brecht oder die Zurücknahme.\\\"1 Dürrenmatt's own remarks on this subject are rather inconclusive. To be linked to Brecht as a post-Brechtian playwright is as meaningful (or usually as meaningless) as the customary linkage established by critics of the nineteenth century between writers of that epoch and Goethe. Emil Staiger, for example, has examined the relationships of contemporary writers to their precursors (and Brecht is already a \\\"precursor\\\" only fourteen years after his death). Staiger recognizes the afemina of contemporary literary artists, yet regrets the fact that modern authors so often resort to parody in order to reduce the great writers of the past to relative harmlessness. As he puts it: Wir dürfen ihnen unsere Achtung und Bewunderung nicht versagen, selbst dann nicht, wenn sie, um sich ihr schweres Geschäft zu erleichtern, die grossen Meister der vergangenen Zeit schmähen und ihre Werke kritisch oder, was noch bedenklicher ist, in Parodien, wie sie an der Tagesordnung sind, unschädlich machen zu müssen glauben.\\\"2 Staiger appears to feel that the modern writer, or any writer for that matter, resorts to parody because he feels threatened. Parody does not necessarily produce this veritable emasculation, but if one follows Staiger's argumentation, it is easy to see how parody could be used and is used to render a writer of the past innocuous, not for the reading public as a whole, but for the writer himself, who may feel trapped or endangered through a literary father-son relationship. Dürrenmatt's Die Physiker reflects Brecht's Leben des Galilei in subject matter and title. Brecht's Galileo faces the choice of either intellectual and physical freedom (in Venice) or the freedom to devote his time to research, unencumbered by financial worries (in Florence). Brecht himself faced this dilemma between East and West. Möbius, the physicist/hero of Diir-\",\"PeriodicalId\":344945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1971-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/RMR.1971.0018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/RMR.1971.0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
伦马特和布莱希特之间的关系是相当有趣的,不仅因为所涉及的作家的个人优点,而且还因为经常有问题的师生关系,或师傅和助手。迟早,每个学生或儿子都必须切断联系,否则就永远留在宙斯的大腿上。关于伦马特与布莱希特的关系,已经写了几篇敏锐的文章,其中最重要的是汉斯·梅尔的《伦马特与布莱希特的关系》。1 . renmatt自己在这个问题上的评论是相当不确定的。将布莱希特作为后布莱希特的剧作家联系起来,就像19世纪评论家将那个时代的作家与歌德联系起来一样有意义(或者通常毫无意义)。例如,埃米尔·斯塔格(Emil Staiger)研究了当代作家与其前辈的关系(而布莱希特在去世仅14年后就已经是一位“前辈”)。斯泰格承认当代文学艺术家的女性地位,但遗憾的是,现代作家经常诉诸拙劣的模仿,以使过去的伟大作家相对无害。正如他所说的那样:Wir drfen ihnen unserere Achtung and Bewunderung nicsen glauben, selbst dhnen unsertung, wenn sie, um sich ihr schweres Geschäft zu erleichteren, die grossen Meister der vergangenen Zeit schmähen and ihre Werke kritisch oder, noch bedenklicher ist, in Parodien, wie sie and der Tagesordnung sind, unschädlich machen zu mssen glauben。斯泰格似乎觉得,现代作家,或者任何作家,因为感到威胁而诉诸模仿。模仿并不一定会产生这种真正的阉化,但如果一个人遵循斯泰格的论点,就很容易看出模仿是如何被使用的,并且被用来使过去的作家变得无害,不是为了整个读者,而是为了作家自己,他可能会因为文学父子关系而感到被困住或处于危险之中。伦马特的《物理学家》在题材和标题上反映了布莱希特的《伽利略的生命》。布莱希特笔下的伽利略面临着选择,要么是智力和身体的自由(在威尼斯),要么是全身心投入研究的自由,不受经济担忧的阻碍(在佛罗伦萨)。布莱希特自己也面临着东西方之间的两难选择。Möbius, Diir-的物理学家/英雄
Adventurers and Cosmonauts: Dürrenmatt's Parody of Brecht?
The relationship between Dürrenmatt and Brecht is of considerable interest, not only for the individual merits of the writers involved, but also because of the often problematical relationship between teacher and student, or master and acolyte. Sooner or later each student or son has to sever the ties or stay forever in Zeus's thigh. Several perceptive essays have been written on Dürrenmatt's relation to Brecht, foremost among them Hans Mayer's "Dürrenmatt und Brecht oder die Zurücknahme."1 Dürrenmatt's own remarks on this subject are rather inconclusive. To be linked to Brecht as a post-Brechtian playwright is as meaningful (or usually as meaningless) as the customary linkage established by critics of the nineteenth century between writers of that epoch and Goethe. Emil Staiger, for example, has examined the relationships of contemporary writers to their precursors (and Brecht is already a "precursor" only fourteen years after his death). Staiger recognizes the afemina of contemporary literary artists, yet regrets the fact that modern authors so often resort to parody in order to reduce the great writers of the past to relative harmlessness. As he puts it: Wir dürfen ihnen unsere Achtung und Bewunderung nicht versagen, selbst dann nicht, wenn sie, um sich ihr schweres Geschäft zu erleichtern, die grossen Meister der vergangenen Zeit schmähen und ihre Werke kritisch oder, was noch bedenklicher ist, in Parodien, wie sie an der Tagesordnung sind, unschädlich machen zu müssen glauben."2 Staiger appears to feel that the modern writer, or any writer for that matter, resorts to parody because he feels threatened. Parody does not necessarily produce this veritable emasculation, but if one follows Staiger's argumentation, it is easy to see how parody could be used and is used to render a writer of the past innocuous, not for the reading public as a whole, but for the writer himself, who may feel trapped or endangered through a literary father-son relationship. Dürrenmatt's Die Physiker reflects Brecht's Leben des Galilei in subject matter and title. Brecht's Galileo faces the choice of either intellectual and physical freedom (in Venice) or the freedom to devote his time to research, unencumbered by financial worries (in Florence). Brecht himself faced this dilemma between East and West. Möbius, the physicist/hero of Diir-