教育对公共部门的影响因素——以美国为例

Constantinos Challoumis Κωνσταντίνος Χαλλουμής
{"title":"教育对公共部门的影响因素——以美国为例","authors":"Constantinos Challoumis Κωνσταντίνος Χαλλουμής","doi":"10.25103/ijbesar.131.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To this thesis is analyzed the impact factor of education to the public sector and tax system, through a procedure of theoretical and mathematical analysis, a quantification method, an econometric method and behavioral scrutiny by a real case scenario. This work compares the cycle of money, to the one case using the impact factor of education and to the other case without it. Then, this work aims to study if the taxes for the education don’t belong to the general approach that taxes make weaker the cycle of money, but have a positive effect on the economy, are a different case as the theory of the cycle of money provides.<br><br>Design/methodology/approach: The analysis stands on the cycle of money and the impact factor of education. Therefore, the appropriate education to the economy supports the market and in general the economy. The impact factor of education enforces the economic dynamic of any economy. The study of cases when there is the factor of education and when this factor is omitted allows the extraction of the appropriate conclusions. Moreover, this analysis is used for the Q.E. method through R.B.Q. model. The use of simulations before the real application guarantees the significance of the results. To be able to understand the way that taxes for the education system, estimated to the one case how the economy interacts with these taxes and after this examination without these taxes, following the mathematical logic of the “reductio ad absurdum”.<br><br>Finding: The education of the U.S. for the period of 2012-2017 shows that taxes for education return to the economy, enhancing it. The general approach of simulation complies with this real case scenario.<br><br>Research limitations/implications: This paper shows that according to the theory of the cycle of money the education belongs to the case of factors that the taxes return to the economy, and robust the economic dynamic of a society.<br><br>Originality/value: The findings of this study contribute to the existing knowledge regarding the concept of the cycle of money to the case of education. The taxes on education belong to the case that the money returns to the economy, on the contrary with most taxes that are not robust the economy and should be reduced.<br>","PeriodicalId":431495,"journal":{"name":"Public Economics: Taxation","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact Factor of Education on the Public Sector – The Case of the U.S.\",\"authors\":\"Constantinos Challoumis Κωνσταντίνος Χαλλουμής\",\"doi\":\"10.25103/ijbesar.131.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To this thesis is analyzed the impact factor of education to the public sector and tax system, through a procedure of theoretical and mathematical analysis, a quantification method, an econometric method and behavioral scrutiny by a real case scenario. This work compares the cycle of money, to the one case using the impact factor of education and to the other case without it. Then, this work aims to study if the taxes for the education don’t belong to the general approach that taxes make weaker the cycle of money, but have a positive effect on the economy, are a different case as the theory of the cycle of money provides.<br><br>Design/methodology/approach: The analysis stands on the cycle of money and the impact factor of education. Therefore, the appropriate education to the economy supports the market and in general the economy. The impact factor of education enforces the economic dynamic of any economy. The study of cases when there is the factor of education and when this factor is omitted allows the extraction of the appropriate conclusions. Moreover, this analysis is used for the Q.E. method through R.B.Q. model. The use of simulations before the real application guarantees the significance of the results. To be able to understand the way that taxes for the education system, estimated to the one case how the economy interacts with these taxes and after this examination without these taxes, following the mathematical logic of the “reductio ad absurdum”.<br><br>Finding: The education of the U.S. for the period of 2012-2017 shows that taxes for education return to the economy, enhancing it. The general approach of simulation complies with this real case scenario.<br><br>Research limitations/implications: This paper shows that according to the theory of the cycle of money the education belongs to the case of factors that the taxes return to the economy, and robust the economic dynamic of a society.<br><br>Originality/value: The findings of this study contribute to the existing knowledge regarding the concept of the cycle of money to the case of education. The taxes on education belong to the case that the money returns to the economy, on the contrary with most taxes that are not robust the economy and should be reduced.<br>\",\"PeriodicalId\":431495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Economics: Taxation\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Economics: Taxation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25103/ijbesar.131.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Economics: Taxation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25103/ijbesar.131.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:本文通过理论和数学分析、量化方法、计量经济学方法和实际案例的行为检验,分析教育对公共部门和税收制度的影响因素。这项工作将货币周期与一种使用教育影响因素的情况和另一种不使用教育影响因素的情况进行比较。然后,本工作旨在研究教育税收是否不属于税收削弱货币周期的一般方法,而是对经济产生积极影响,这是货币周期理论提供的另一种情况。设计/方法/方法:分析基于金钱的循环和教育的影响因素。因此,适当的经济教育支持市场和总体经济。教育的影响因素加强了任何经济体的经济活力。在存在教育因素和忽略这一因素的情况下,对案例的研究可以得出适当的结论。并通过R.B.Q.模型对qe.e.方法进行了分析。在实际应用之前进行仿真,保证了结果的意义。为了能够理解教育系统的税收方式,估计到一个案例中经济是如何与这些税收相互作用的,以及在没有这些税收的情况下,遵循“还原法与谬论”的数学逻辑。发现:2012-2017年期间美国的教育表明,教育税收回归经济,增强了经济。模拟的一般方法符合实际情况。研究局限/启示:根据货币周期理论,教育属于税收回归经济的因素,并增强了一个社会的经济活力。原创性/价值:本研究的发现有助于将现有的关于货币周期概念的知识运用到教育案例中。教育税属于资金回归经济的情况,与大多数对经济不强劲的税收相反,应该减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact Factor of Education on the Public Sector – The Case of the U.S.
Purpose: To this thesis is analyzed the impact factor of education to the public sector and tax system, through a procedure of theoretical and mathematical analysis, a quantification method, an econometric method and behavioral scrutiny by a real case scenario. This work compares the cycle of money, to the one case using the impact factor of education and to the other case without it. Then, this work aims to study if the taxes for the education don’t belong to the general approach that taxes make weaker the cycle of money, but have a positive effect on the economy, are a different case as the theory of the cycle of money provides.

Design/methodology/approach: The analysis stands on the cycle of money and the impact factor of education. Therefore, the appropriate education to the economy supports the market and in general the economy. The impact factor of education enforces the economic dynamic of any economy. The study of cases when there is the factor of education and when this factor is omitted allows the extraction of the appropriate conclusions. Moreover, this analysis is used for the Q.E. method through R.B.Q. model. The use of simulations before the real application guarantees the significance of the results. To be able to understand the way that taxes for the education system, estimated to the one case how the economy interacts with these taxes and after this examination without these taxes, following the mathematical logic of the “reductio ad absurdum”.

Finding: The education of the U.S. for the period of 2012-2017 shows that taxes for education return to the economy, enhancing it. The general approach of simulation complies with this real case scenario.

Research limitations/implications: This paper shows that according to the theory of the cycle of money the education belongs to the case of factors that the taxes return to the economy, and robust the economic dynamic of a society.

Originality/value: The findings of this study contribute to the existing knowledge regarding the concept of the cycle of money to the case of education. The taxes on education belong to the case that the money returns to the economy, on the contrary with most taxes that are not robust the economy and should be reduced.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Gini Index Weights Income by the Proportion of People Receiving More Comment on International Tax Reform Framework Discussion Draft by Senate Committee on Finance Chair Ron Wyden and Senators Sherrod Brown and Mark Warner The VAT under Excess Capacity: The Case of Ethiopia VAT Refunds in Developing Countries The Failure of Opportunity Zones in Oregon: Lifeless Place-Based Economic Development Implementation through a Policy Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1