信任工作者项目:在公共奖学金中建立信任的挑战和方法

Cristian Capotescu, E. Cohn, Gil Eyal, Judelysse Gomez, J. LaViolette, Danielle Lee Tomson
{"title":"信任工作者项目:在公共奖学金中建立信任的挑战和方法","authors":"Cristian Capotescu, E. Cohn, Gil Eyal, Judelysse Gomez, J. LaViolette, Danielle Lee Tomson","doi":"10.59522/ciou2388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article grapples with a critical question in public humanities work: How should academics think of trust as a theoretical problem in current public health, policy, and academic debates but also as a practice of engagement with local communities and collaborators outside the academy? We recount our experience of the TrustWorkers project at Columbia University in 2022—a project focused on the critical role of Community Health Workers as trust builders during the pandemic—to illustrate our thinking on this matter and contribute new impulses to publicly engaged scholarship.","PeriodicalId":269872,"journal":{"name":"Public Philosophy Journal","volume":"464 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The TrustWorkers Project: Challenges and Methods of Building Trust into Public Scholarship\",\"authors\":\"Cristian Capotescu, E. Cohn, Gil Eyal, Judelysse Gomez, J. LaViolette, Danielle Lee Tomson\",\"doi\":\"10.59522/ciou2388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article grapples with a critical question in public humanities work: How should academics think of trust as a theoretical problem in current public health, policy, and academic debates but also as a practice of engagement with local communities and collaborators outside the academy? We recount our experience of the TrustWorkers project at Columbia University in 2022—a project focused on the critical role of Community Health Workers as trust builders during the pandemic—to illustrate our thinking on this matter and contribute new impulses to publicly engaged scholarship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Public Philosophy Journal\",\"volume\":\"464 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Public Philosophy Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59522/ciou2388\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Philosophy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59522/ciou2388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了公共人文学科工作中的一个关键问题:学者应该如何将信任视为当前公共卫生、政策和学术辩论中的一个理论问题,同时也是与当地社区和学术界以外的合作者接触的一种实践?我们讲述了我们在哥伦比亚大学(Columbia University)于2022年开展的“信任工作者”(TrustWorkers)项目的经验——该项目专注于社区卫生工作者在疫情期间作为信任建设者的关键作用——以阐明我们对这一问题的思考,并为公共参与的学术研究提供新的动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The TrustWorkers Project: Challenges and Methods of Building Trust into Public Scholarship
This article grapples with a critical question in public humanities work: How should academics think of trust as a theoretical problem in current public health, policy, and academic debates but also as a practice of engagement with local communities and collaborators outside the academy? We recount our experience of the TrustWorkers project at Columbia University in 2022—a project focused on the critical role of Community Health Workers as trust builders during the pandemic—to illustrate our thinking on this matter and contribute new impulses to publicly engaged scholarship.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The TrustWorkers Project: Challenges and Methods of Building Trust into Public Scholarship Grief and the Patience Required for Acceptance: Willfulness vs. Willingness What Acceptance Is A Public Holistic Response to "Thinking Differently about Tenant Rights" "Thinking Differently about Tenant Rights": Author's Response
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1