道路交通信息学能否帮助弱势道路使用者?

O. Carsten
{"title":"道路交通信息学能否帮助弱势道路使用者?","authors":"O. Carsten","doi":"10.4271/912855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Road Transport Informatics (RTI) systems for improving the vehicular traffic situation are often aimed at increasing capacities and reducing travel times on urban roads. Such measures may well have severe disbenefits for vulnerable road users in that they are likely to increase vehicle speeds. A small increase in average vehicle speed would result in quite large increases in fatalities and injuries to vulnerable road users. It would also have the effect of making walking and cycling more difficult - for example pedestrians would face increased crossing delays. There remains the alternative of designing RTI systems specifically to enhance the mobility and safety of vulnerable road users. Yet even here there are a number of difficulties. In particular, it is difficult to conceive of applying systems to confront the problem directly, e.g by equipping cars with vulnerable road user (VRU) detection devices or to equip VRUs with devices that provide advice in difficult situations. The in-car devices have the problem of predicting VRU behaviour (for example, when a pedestrian standing at the kerbs actually going to cross) and the VRU-carried devices are unlikely to be used on a wide scale in the foreseeable future. It therefore seems more fruitful to use RTI in a more indirect manner to enhance VRU safety and mobility.","PeriodicalId":126255,"journal":{"name":"Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, 1991","volume":"155 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can road transport informatics help vulnerable road users?\",\"authors\":\"O. Carsten\",\"doi\":\"10.4271/912855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Road Transport Informatics (RTI) systems for improving the vehicular traffic situation are often aimed at increasing capacities and reducing travel times on urban roads. Such measures may well have severe disbenefits for vulnerable road users in that they are likely to increase vehicle speeds. A small increase in average vehicle speed would result in quite large increases in fatalities and injuries to vulnerable road users. It would also have the effect of making walking and cycling more difficult - for example pedestrians would face increased crossing delays. There remains the alternative of designing RTI systems specifically to enhance the mobility and safety of vulnerable road users. Yet even here there are a number of difficulties. In particular, it is difficult to conceive of applying systems to confront the problem directly, e.g by equipping cars with vulnerable road user (VRU) detection devices or to equip VRUs with devices that provide advice in difficult situations. The in-car devices have the problem of predicting VRU behaviour (for example, when a pedestrian standing at the kerbs actually going to cross) and the VRU-carried devices are unlikely to be used on a wide scale in the foreseeable future. It therefore seems more fruitful to use RTI in a more indirect manner to enhance VRU safety and mobility.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, 1991\",\"volume\":\"155 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, 1991\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4271/912855\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, 1991","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/912855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

用于改善车辆交通状况的道路运输信息系统通常旨在提高城市道路上的通行能力和减少旅行时间。这些措施很可能对脆弱的道路使用者产生严重的不利影响,因为它们可能会提高车辆的速度。平均车速的小幅提高会导致脆弱的道路使用者的伤亡人数大幅增加。它还会使步行和骑自行车变得更加困难——例如,行人将面临更多的过马路延误。还有一种选择是专门设计RTI系统,以提高弱势道路使用者的机动性和安全性。然而,即使在这方面也存在一些困难。特别是,很难设想应用系统来直接面对这个问题,例如,为汽车配备易受伤害的道路使用者(VRU)检测设备,或为VRU配备在困难情况下提供建议的设备。车载设备存在预测VRU行为的问题(例如,当站在路边的行人真的要过马路时),而且在可预见的未来,搭载VRU的设备不太可能大规模使用。因此,以更间接的方式使用RTI来提高VRU的安全性和移动性似乎更有成效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can road transport informatics help vulnerable road users?
Road Transport Informatics (RTI) systems for improving the vehicular traffic situation are often aimed at increasing capacities and reducing travel times on urban roads. Such measures may well have severe disbenefits for vulnerable road users in that they are likely to increase vehicle speeds. A small increase in average vehicle speed would result in quite large increases in fatalities and injuries to vulnerable road users. It would also have the effect of making walking and cycling more difficult - for example pedestrians would face increased crossing delays. There remains the alternative of designing RTI systems specifically to enhance the mobility and safety of vulnerable road users. Yet even here there are a number of difficulties. In particular, it is difficult to conceive of applying systems to confront the problem directly, e.g by equipping cars with vulnerable road user (VRU) detection devices or to equip VRUs with devices that provide advice in difficult situations. The in-car devices have the problem of predicting VRU behaviour (for example, when a pedestrian standing at the kerbs actually going to cross) and the VRU-carried devices are unlikely to be used on a wide scale in the foreseeable future. It therefore seems more fruitful to use RTI in a more indirect manner to enhance VRU safety and mobility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Signal preemption as a priority treatment tool for transit demand management An object-oriented traffic simulation with IVHS applications Intelligent driving—Prometheus approaches to longitudinal traffic flow control Highway automation: System modeling for impacts analysis Designing and implementing a PC-based, graphical, interactive, real-time advanced traveler information system that meets commuter needs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1