赫尔佐格和德勒兹的新自然主义

Mehdi Parsakhanqah
{"title":"赫尔佐格和德勒兹的新自然主义","authors":"Mehdi Parsakhanqah","doi":"10.22492/IJAH.5.1.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reviews distinctive elements of Werner Herzog’s naturalism and endeavors to analyse it within a philosophical framework that has Gilles Deleuze’s ideas as primary referent. Deleuze’s discussion of Stoic philosophy, specifically the concept of quasi-causality, will be a critical mainstay for this reading of Herzog. The axial objective is to determine how an immanent construction of reality, or what I will call genesis, is the subject matter of both Herzog’s speculative and imaginative naturalism and Deleuze’s pluralistic realism. This notion demands that we direct our attention to the manner in which Herzog's protagonists are all mad in a way, all the while focusing on how this madness helps to forge the distinctive characteristics of his aesthetic creation. As a result, we find in Herzog a peculiar kind of agency, different from rational or causal agency. Here, drives and impulses inform decisions and incite the characters to take action. Consequently, I aim to demonstrate the existence of an affinity between this agency in Herzog and the notion of quasi-causality in Deleuze’s reading of the Stoics.","PeriodicalId":331688,"journal":{"name":"IAFOR Journal of Arts and Humanities","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New Naturalism of Herzog and Deleuze\",\"authors\":\"Mehdi Parsakhanqah\",\"doi\":\"10.22492/IJAH.5.1.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article reviews distinctive elements of Werner Herzog’s naturalism and endeavors to analyse it within a philosophical framework that has Gilles Deleuze’s ideas as primary referent. Deleuze’s discussion of Stoic philosophy, specifically the concept of quasi-causality, will be a critical mainstay for this reading of Herzog. The axial objective is to determine how an immanent construction of reality, or what I will call genesis, is the subject matter of both Herzog’s speculative and imaginative naturalism and Deleuze’s pluralistic realism. This notion demands that we direct our attention to the manner in which Herzog's protagonists are all mad in a way, all the while focusing on how this madness helps to forge the distinctive characteristics of his aesthetic creation. As a result, we find in Herzog a peculiar kind of agency, different from rational or causal agency. Here, drives and impulses inform decisions and incite the characters to take action. Consequently, I aim to demonstrate the existence of an affinity between this agency in Herzog and the notion of quasi-causality in Deleuze’s reading of the Stoics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IAFOR Journal of Arts and Humanities\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IAFOR Journal of Arts and Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22492/IJAH.5.1.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IAFOR Journal of Arts and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22492/IJAH.5.1.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文回顾了赫尔佐格自然主义的独特元素,并试图在以德勒兹思想为主要参照的哲学框架内对其进行分析。德勒兹对斯多葛派哲学的讨论,特别是准因果关系的概念,将成为阅读赫尔佐格的关键支柱。核心目标是确定现实的内在建构,或者我称之为起源,如何成为赫尔佐格的思辨和想象的自然主义和德勒兹的多元现实主义的主题。这个概念要求我们把注意力集中在赫尔佐格的主人公都在某种程度上疯狂的方式上,同时关注这种疯狂是如何帮助形成他的美学创作的独特特征的。因此,我们在赫尔佐格身上发现了一种特殊的代理,不同于理性或因果代理。在这里,驱动和冲动决定并激励角色采取行动。因此,我的目标是证明在赫尔佐格的这种代理和德勒兹对斯多葛派的解读中准因果关系的概念之间存在着一种亲缘关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New Naturalism of Herzog and Deleuze
This article reviews distinctive elements of Werner Herzog’s naturalism and endeavors to analyse it within a philosophical framework that has Gilles Deleuze’s ideas as primary referent. Deleuze’s discussion of Stoic philosophy, specifically the concept of quasi-causality, will be a critical mainstay for this reading of Herzog. The axial objective is to determine how an immanent construction of reality, or what I will call genesis, is the subject matter of both Herzog’s speculative and imaginative naturalism and Deleuze’s pluralistic realism. This notion demands that we direct our attention to the manner in which Herzog's protagonists are all mad in a way, all the while focusing on how this madness helps to forge the distinctive characteristics of his aesthetic creation. As a result, we find in Herzog a peculiar kind of agency, different from rational or causal agency. Here, drives and impulses inform decisions and incite the characters to take action. Consequently, I aim to demonstrate the existence of an affinity between this agency in Herzog and the notion of quasi-causality in Deleuze’s reading of the Stoics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
W. B. Yeats’ “September 1913” as an Elegy: Generic Deviation Notes on Facing The Biographical Illusion Without Getting Lost in the Process New Naturalism of Herzog and Deleuze The Past is Present and Future: Recurring Violence and Remaining Human in J. K. Rowling’s Harry Potter Series Locating and Relocating Cultural Engagements in a Transnational Age
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1