进化论的人文用事

G. Toepfer
{"title":"进化论的人文用事","authors":"G. Toepfer","doi":"10.1515/zksp-2014-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essay analyzes the current trend of viewing cultural phenomena from the perspective of evolutionary biology. It focuses on reconstructing claims from neo-naturalistic approaches and assesses their relevance for the humanities. The essay’s historical overview distinguishes four phases in these evolutionary accounts of cultural phenomena. An in-depth analysis looks at positions recently taken by scholars from the humanities, in particular Karl Eibl, Winfried Menninghaus, Horst Bredekamp and Wolfgang Welsch. The critique of their positions is directed at their interpretations of biological theories and at instances of restrictive fundamentalism that posit the biological perspective as more fundamental DOI 10.1515/zksp-2014-0003 ZKSP 2014; 1(1): 40–80","PeriodicalId":250691,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Die geisteswissenschaftliche Inanspruchnahme der Evolutionsbiologie\",\"authors\":\"G. Toepfer\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/zksp-2014-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The essay analyzes the current trend of viewing cultural phenomena from the perspective of evolutionary biology. It focuses on reconstructing claims from neo-naturalistic approaches and assesses their relevance for the humanities. The essay’s historical overview distinguishes four phases in these evolutionary accounts of cultural phenomena. An in-depth analysis looks at positions recently taken by scholars from the humanities, in particular Karl Eibl, Winfried Menninghaus, Horst Bredekamp and Wolfgang Welsch. The critique of their positions is directed at their interpretations of biological theories and at instances of restrictive fundamentalism that posit the biological perspective as more fundamental DOI 10.1515/zksp-2014-0003 ZKSP 2014; 1(1): 40–80\",\"PeriodicalId\":250691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2014-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2014-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从进化生物学的角度分析了当前看待文化现象的趋势。它侧重于重建新自然主义方法的主张,并评估它们与人文学科的相关性。这篇文章的历史概述区分了这些文化现象的进化描述的四个阶段。一项深入的分析着眼于最近人文学科学者的立场,特别是卡尔·艾比尔、温弗里德·门宁豪斯、霍斯特·布雷德坎普和沃尔夫冈·韦尔奇。对他们立场的批评是针对他们对生物学理论的解释和限制性原教旨主义的实例,这些原教旨主义认为生物学观点是更基本的DOI 10.1515/ ZKSP -2014-0003 ZKSP 2014;1 (1): 40 - 80
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Die geisteswissenschaftliche Inanspruchnahme der Evolutionsbiologie
The essay analyzes the current trend of viewing cultural phenomena from the perspective of evolutionary biology. It focuses on reconstructing claims from neo-naturalistic approaches and assesses their relevance for the humanities. The essay’s historical overview distinguishes four phases in these evolutionary accounts of cultural phenomena. An in-depth analysis looks at positions recently taken by scholars from the humanities, in particular Karl Eibl, Winfried Menninghaus, Horst Bredekamp and Wolfgang Welsch. The critique of their positions is directed at their interpretations of biological theories and at instances of restrictive fundamentalism that posit the biological perspective as more fundamental DOI 10.1515/zksp-2014-0003 ZKSP 2014; 1(1): 40–80
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Die Destruktion der Gesellschaftstheorie: Ernesto Laclaus und Chantal Mouffes Versuch einer nicht-essentialistischen Politischen Philosophie Ohne Form kein Inhalt Politics contra the functionalisation of man – Hannah Arendt’s problematic investigation of ideology and labour Between conflict and consensus: Why democracy needs conflicts and why communities should delimit their intensity Die „letzte Sinnlosigkeit“
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1