1. 理想化的浪漫爱情、法律问题与父权剥削:历史与文学婚姻话语导论

Marriage Discourses Pub Date : 2021-11-22 DOI:10.1515/9783110751451-001

F. Jacob, J. A. Mohammed

{"title":"1. 理想化的浪漫爱情、法律问题与父权剥削:历史与文学婚姻话语导论","authors":"F. Jacob, J. A. Mohammed","doi":"10.1515/9783110751451-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The latest ... dilemma I’ve encountered is a big one. Until I told my friends I was getting married, I didn’t know marriage and feminism could be considered mutually exclusive. I mean, just because a bride’s engagement ring is a symbol of ownership, and just because changing her name erases her identity as a separate individual, and just because the whole thing is ludicrously assumed to be the woman’s domain...1","PeriodicalId":126475,"journal":{"name":"Marriage Discourses","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"1. Idealized Romantic Love, Legal Issues, and Patriarchic Exploitation: An Introduction to Historical and Literary Marriage Discourses\",\"authors\":\"F. Jacob, J. A. Mohammed\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110751451-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The latest ... dilemma I’ve encountered is a big one. Until I told my friends I was getting married, I didn’t know marriage and feminism could be considered mutually exclusive. I mean, just because a bride’s engagement ring is a symbol of ownership, and just because changing her name erases her identity as a separate individual, and just because the whole thing is ludicrously assumed to be the woman’s domain...1\",\"PeriodicalId\":126475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marriage Discourses\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marriage Discourses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110751451-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marriage Discourses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110751451-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

最新的…我所遇到的困境是一个很大的难题。直到我告诉我的朋友我要结婚了，我才知道婚姻和女权主义可以被认为是相互排斥的。我的意思是，仅仅因为新娘的订婚戒指是所有权的象征，仅仅因为改变她的名字抹去了她作为一个独立个体的身份，仅仅因为整个事情都被荒谬地认为是女人的领域

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

1. Idealized Romantic Love, Legal Issues, and Patriarchic Exploitation: An Introduction to Historical and Literary Marriage Discourses

The latest ... dilemma I’ve encountered is a big one. Until I told my friends I was getting married, I didn’t know marriage and feminism could be considered mutually exclusive. I mean, just because a bride’s engagement ring is a symbol of ownership, and just because changing her name erases her identity as a separate individual, and just because the whole thing is ludicrously assumed to be the woman’s domain...1

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Marriage Discourses

自引率

0.00%

发文量