导言:前南斯拉夫境内的欧洲化与政党政治

Danica Fink-Hafner, Robert Ladrech
{"title":"导言:前南斯拉夫境内的欧洲化与政党政治","authors":"Danica Fink-Hafner, Robert Ladrech","doi":"10.1080/14613190802145432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of national political parties and the European Union (EU) has evolved over recent years in two directions. The first direction one might term ‘levels of analysis’, in which research focuses on the relationship between the European, national, and in somecases, the sub-national, level of party relationswithin theEU. Thiswould include the organizational development andactivities of transnational party federations (or Europarties), the development of programmatic positions on theEUamongnational parties, etc. Itwould also include the analysis of the pattern of competition within the European Parliament between party groups and the impact of the EU on national party systems. The second direction in which national political parties havebeen approachedwithin the context of the ‘impact of Europe’ has been related to EU enlargements. The establishment of a scholarly connection between European integration on the one hand, and the dynamics of national political parties on the other, was originally confined to political phenomena in Western Europe. This is not surprising as the first studies explaining the emergence of Europarties, analysis of direct elections to the European Parliament, and soon thereafter individual party stances vis-à-vis the EC/EU, began to emerge at the end of the 1970s when competitive party systems were located exclusively in this area of Europe. This changed with the processes associated with the accession to the EU of a number of post-communist countries in 2004. From the late 1990s onwards, scholars investigated the impact of theEUon the emerging political systems and economies of these countries, in many cases under the label of ‘Europeanization’. During the pre-accession period, approaches to the study of parties and elections in these countries were based on those developed to study competitive elections in the West. Thus models of voter volatility, party organization, etc., were incorporated into analytical frameworks for Central and Eastern European (CEE) parties and party systems. By the early 2000s, however, adjustments based upon empirical political reality promoted new advances in the study—and expectations—of parties and the EU inCEE countries. Rates of electoral volatility, in general, have remained high compared to theWest; Eurosceptic public opinion has been changing (often with ups and downs in the specific country’s success in relations with the EU); party organization remains weak; etc.Apart from these ‘generic’ features, it should benoted that inmanypostcommunist countries Europeanization under the slogan ‘returning to Europe’ became anew ideology supported bymanypolitical parties aswell as an informed positive opinion among decision-makers and opinion-formers, making the EU a credible alternative for CEE post-communist countries during the 1990s. Since EU","PeriodicalId":313717,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: Europeanization and party politics in the territory of former Yugoslavia\",\"authors\":\"Danica Fink-Hafner, Robert Ladrech\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14613190802145432\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study of national political parties and the European Union (EU) has evolved over recent years in two directions. The first direction one might term ‘levels of analysis’, in which research focuses on the relationship between the European, national, and in somecases, the sub-national, level of party relationswithin theEU. Thiswould include the organizational development andactivities of transnational party federations (or Europarties), the development of programmatic positions on theEUamongnational parties, etc. Itwould also include the analysis of the pattern of competition within the European Parliament between party groups and the impact of the EU on national party systems. The second direction in which national political parties havebeen approachedwithin the context of the ‘impact of Europe’ has been related to EU enlargements. The establishment of a scholarly connection between European integration on the one hand, and the dynamics of national political parties on the other, was originally confined to political phenomena in Western Europe. This is not surprising as the first studies explaining the emergence of Europarties, analysis of direct elections to the European Parliament, and soon thereafter individual party stances vis-à-vis the EC/EU, began to emerge at the end of the 1970s when competitive party systems were located exclusively in this area of Europe. This changed with the processes associated with the accession to the EU of a number of post-communist countries in 2004. From the late 1990s onwards, scholars investigated the impact of theEUon the emerging political systems and economies of these countries, in many cases under the label of ‘Europeanization’. During the pre-accession period, approaches to the study of parties and elections in these countries were based on those developed to study competitive elections in the West. Thus models of voter volatility, party organization, etc., were incorporated into analytical frameworks for Central and Eastern European (CEE) parties and party systems. By the early 2000s, however, adjustments based upon empirical political reality promoted new advances in the study—and expectations—of parties and the EU inCEE countries. Rates of electoral volatility, in general, have remained high compared to theWest; Eurosceptic public opinion has been changing (often with ups and downs in the specific country’s success in relations with the EU); party organization remains weak; etc.Apart from these ‘generic’ features, it should benoted that inmanypostcommunist countries Europeanization under the slogan ‘returning to Europe’ became anew ideology supported bymanypolitical parties aswell as an informed positive opinion among decision-makers and opinion-formers, making the EU a credible alternative for CEE post-communist countries during the 1990s. Since EU\",\"PeriodicalId\":313717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190802145432\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Southern Europe and the Balkans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613190802145432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

近年来,对国家政党与欧盟的研究有两个方向的发展。第一个方向可能被称为“分析水平”,其中研究的重点是欧洲、国家之间的关系,在某些情况下,是欧盟内部政党关系的次国家水平。这将包括跨国政党联合会(或欧洲政党)的组织发展和活动,各国政党在欧盟问题上的纲领立场的发展等。它还将包括分析欧洲议会内部各党派之间的竞争模式,以及欧盟对各国政党制度的影响。在“欧洲影响”的背景下,国家政党的第二个发展方向与欧盟扩大有关。建立欧洲一体化与国家政党动态之间的学术联系,最初仅限于西欧的政治现象。这并不奇怪,因为解释欧洲政党出现的第一批研究,对欧洲议会直接选举的分析,以及此后不久对欧洲共同体/欧盟的个别政党立场,在20世纪70年代末开始出现,当时竞争性政党制度仅位于欧洲的这一地区。随着2004年一些后共产主义国家加入欧盟,这种情况发生了变化。从20世纪90年代末开始,学者们调查了欧盟对这些国家新兴政治制度和经济的影响,在许多情况下都被贴上了“欧洲化”的标签。在加入前期间,研究这些国家的政党和选举的方法是根据为研究西方的竞争性选举而制定的方法。因此,选民波动、政党组织等模型被纳入中欧和东欧政党和政党制度的分析框架。然而,到21世纪初,基于经验政治现实的调整促进了政党和欧盟东欧国家的研究和期望的新进展。总的来说,与西方相比,选举的不稳定率仍然很高;对欧洲持怀疑态度的公众舆论一直在变化(通常是随着特定国家与欧盟关系的成功而起伏不定);党的组织薄弱;除了这些“通用”特征之外,应该注意的是,在许多后共产主义国家,以“回归欧洲”为口号的欧洲化成为许多政党支持的新意识形态,也是决策者和舆论形成者中知情的积极意见,使欧盟成为20世纪90年代中东欧后共产主义国家的可靠选择。自欧盟
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introduction: Europeanization and party politics in the territory of former Yugoslavia
The study of national political parties and the European Union (EU) has evolved over recent years in two directions. The first direction one might term ‘levels of analysis’, in which research focuses on the relationship between the European, national, and in somecases, the sub-national, level of party relationswithin theEU. Thiswould include the organizational development andactivities of transnational party federations (or Europarties), the development of programmatic positions on theEUamongnational parties, etc. Itwould also include the analysis of the pattern of competition within the European Parliament between party groups and the impact of the EU on national party systems. The second direction in which national political parties havebeen approachedwithin the context of the ‘impact of Europe’ has been related to EU enlargements. The establishment of a scholarly connection between European integration on the one hand, and the dynamics of national political parties on the other, was originally confined to political phenomena in Western Europe. This is not surprising as the first studies explaining the emergence of Europarties, analysis of direct elections to the European Parliament, and soon thereafter individual party stances vis-à-vis the EC/EU, began to emerge at the end of the 1970s when competitive party systems were located exclusively in this area of Europe. This changed with the processes associated with the accession to the EU of a number of post-communist countries in 2004. From the late 1990s onwards, scholars investigated the impact of theEUon the emerging political systems and economies of these countries, in many cases under the label of ‘Europeanization’. During the pre-accession period, approaches to the study of parties and elections in these countries were based on those developed to study competitive elections in the West. Thus models of voter volatility, party organization, etc., were incorporated into analytical frameworks for Central and Eastern European (CEE) parties and party systems. By the early 2000s, however, adjustments based upon empirical political reality promoted new advances in the study—and expectations—of parties and the EU inCEE countries. Rates of electoral volatility, in general, have remained high compared to theWest; Eurosceptic public opinion has been changing (often with ups and downs in the specific country’s success in relations with the EU); party organization remains weak; etc.Apart from these ‘generic’ features, it should benoted that inmanypostcommunist countries Europeanization under the slogan ‘returning to Europe’ became anew ideology supported bymanypolitical parties aswell as an informed positive opinion among decision-makers and opinion-formers, making the EU a credible alternative for CEE post-communist countries during the 1990s. Since EU
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Leaders, political behaviour and decision-making: the case of the former President of the Republic of Cyprus, George Vasiliou Understanding banking sector reforms in Turkey: assessing the roles of domestic versus external actors The Europeanization of Turkey and its impact on the Cyprus problem Building institutional, economic and social capacities through discourse: the role of NGOs in the context of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia The Southern European model of immigration: do the cases of Malta, Cyprus and Slovenia fit?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1