在线、面对面协作和学习方式对健康导论课程认知负荷和投入的影响

Cheng-Hsuan Lan, Meng-Huei Sheng, Yu-Chiung Hsu, Ya-Ming Shiue
{"title":"在线、面对面协作和学习方式对健康导论课程认知负荷和投入的影响","authors":"Cheng-Hsuan Lan, Meng-Huei Sheng, Yu-Chiung Hsu, Ya-Ming Shiue","doi":"10.1145/3340037.3340069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although collaborative learning has received increasing attention, few studies have examined the differences between online and face-to-face (f2f) collaboration. This study utilized a two-factor experimental design to investigate the influences of collaboration mode (f2f versus online) and learning style on students' cognitive load and engagement. To assess the differences between online and f2f collaboration, cognitive load scale and engagement were collected from two different classes taking the same course at a university in Taiwan. The results show that online collaboration led to a higher cognitive load than that required for f2f collaboration because students have to learn how to use the online collaboration platform. However, online collaboration had higher engagement compared to that for f2f collaboration which represented student were more willing to engage in collaborative technologies. Students who preferred visual learning reported that the use of online collaboration led to less cognitive load and higher sustained attention than that experienced with verbal learning. No significant differences were found related to students' learning style in the f2f collaboration group.","PeriodicalId":340774,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Online and Face-to-face Collaboration and Learning Style on Cognitive Load and Engagement in a Health Introductory Course\",\"authors\":\"Cheng-Hsuan Lan, Meng-Huei Sheng, Yu-Chiung Hsu, Ya-Ming Shiue\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3340037.3340069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although collaborative learning has received increasing attention, few studies have examined the differences between online and face-to-face (f2f) collaboration. This study utilized a two-factor experimental design to investigate the influences of collaboration mode (f2f versus online) and learning style on students' cognitive load and engagement. To assess the differences between online and f2f collaboration, cognitive load scale and engagement were collected from two different classes taking the same course at a university in Taiwan. The results show that online collaboration led to a higher cognitive load than that required for f2f collaboration because students have to learn how to use the online collaboration platform. However, online collaboration had higher engagement compared to that for f2f collaboration which represented student were more willing to engage in collaborative technologies. Students who preferred visual learning reported that the use of online collaboration led to less cognitive load and higher sustained attention than that experienced with verbal learning. No significant differences were found related to students' learning style in the f2f collaboration group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3340037.3340069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3340037.3340069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

尽管协作学习受到越来越多的关注,但很少有研究考察在线和面对面(f2f)协作之间的差异。本研究采用双因素实验设计,探讨协作模式(线上与线下)和学习方式对学生认知负荷和投入的影响。为了评估在线协作和线下协作的差异,我们收集了台湾某大学同一课程的两个不同班级的认知负荷量表和参与度。结果表明,由于学生必须学习如何使用在线协作平台,因此在线协作导致的认知负荷高于f2f协作所需的认知负荷。然而,在线协作比线下协作具有更高的参与度,这表明学生更愿意参与协作技术。喜欢视觉学习的学生报告说,与口头学习相比,使用在线协作导致了更少的认知负荷和更高的持续注意力。在f2f合作组中,学生的学习风格没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Influence of Online and Face-to-face Collaboration and Learning Style on Cognitive Load and Engagement in a Health Introductory Course
Although collaborative learning has received increasing attention, few studies have examined the differences between online and face-to-face (f2f) collaboration. This study utilized a two-factor experimental design to investigate the influences of collaboration mode (f2f versus online) and learning style on students' cognitive load and engagement. To assess the differences between online and f2f collaboration, cognitive load scale and engagement were collected from two different classes taking the same course at a university in Taiwan. The results show that online collaboration led to a higher cognitive load than that required for f2f collaboration because students have to learn how to use the online collaboration platform. However, online collaboration had higher engagement compared to that for f2f collaboration which represented student were more willing to engage in collaborative technologies. Students who preferred visual learning reported that the use of online collaboration led to less cognitive load and higher sustained attention than that experienced with verbal learning. No significant differences were found related to students' learning style in the f2f collaboration group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DGFE-VG: Dynamic Gene Feature Extraction via Visibility Graph Cardiovascular Incidence, Mortality and Web-Based Data in China Advances in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases by Phytosterol Mixed Reality Patients Monitoring Application for Critical Care Nurses The Development of an Aggregated Electronic Health Record in Compliance with Consolidated Clinical Document Architecture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1