基于内在和外在动机的激励机制的自动化系统的使用、接受和采用

Hannah M. Barr, R. C. Smitherman, Bryan L. Mesmer, Kristin Weger, Douglas L. Van Bossuyt, Robert Semmens, N. Tenhundfeld
{"title":"基于内在和外在动机的激励机制的自动化系统的使用、接受和采用","authors":"Hannah M. Barr, R. C. Smitherman, Bryan L. Mesmer, Kristin Weger, Douglas L. Van Bossuyt, Robert Semmens, N. Tenhundfeld","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS55548.2022.9799319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Incentive mechanisms are used to encourage a behavior. Incentive mechanisms can be reputation incentives (social standing risks and rewards), gamification incentives (game-based elements in non-gaming environments), and feedback incentives (verbal or text feedback). Previous research suggests that reputation and gamification incentives provide extrinsic motivation (EM), while feedback incentives provide intrinsic motivation (IM). Incentive mechanisms vary in effectiveness, but most studies indicate that IM yielding incentives are most effective. Incentive mechanisms used to promote the use, acceptance, and adoption of automated systems can prove useful to organizations that do not want to waste resources on unused systems. Incentivizing the use, acceptance, and adoption of automated systems can enhance productivity, overall safety, and work-life balance. Though there are many studies on these topics, the relative effectiveness of different IM and EM incentive mechanisms has not been studied. This study fills that gap by examining the effectiveness of incentive mechanisms that affect IM and EM. The current study utilized reputation incentives, gamification incentives, feedback incentives, and a control group to compare the use, acceptance, and adoption of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in a simulated hostage rescue task. Data were collected on how frequently participants used the system. Following the hostage rescue task, participants were given questionnaires measuring motivation, acceptance, and adoption. This study provides insight into the relative influence of IM and EM-based incentive mechanisms to promote automated technologies. These results will help elucidate the steps that organizations like the Military can take to enhance warfighter buy-in and use of new technologies.","PeriodicalId":286724,"journal":{"name":"2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use, Acceptance, and Adoption of Automated Systems with Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation Based Incentive Mechanisms\",\"authors\":\"Hannah M. Barr, R. C. Smitherman, Bryan L. Mesmer, Kristin Weger, Douglas L. Van Bossuyt, Robert Semmens, N. Tenhundfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SIEDS55548.2022.9799319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Incentive mechanisms are used to encourage a behavior. Incentive mechanisms can be reputation incentives (social standing risks and rewards), gamification incentives (game-based elements in non-gaming environments), and feedback incentives (verbal or text feedback). Previous research suggests that reputation and gamification incentives provide extrinsic motivation (EM), while feedback incentives provide intrinsic motivation (IM). Incentive mechanisms vary in effectiveness, but most studies indicate that IM yielding incentives are most effective. Incentive mechanisms used to promote the use, acceptance, and adoption of automated systems can prove useful to organizations that do not want to waste resources on unused systems. Incentivizing the use, acceptance, and adoption of automated systems can enhance productivity, overall safety, and work-life balance. Though there are many studies on these topics, the relative effectiveness of different IM and EM incentive mechanisms has not been studied. This study fills that gap by examining the effectiveness of incentive mechanisms that affect IM and EM. The current study utilized reputation incentives, gamification incentives, feedback incentives, and a control group to compare the use, acceptance, and adoption of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in a simulated hostage rescue task. Data were collected on how frequently participants used the system. Following the hostage rescue task, participants were given questionnaires measuring motivation, acceptance, and adoption. This study provides insight into the relative influence of IM and EM-based incentive mechanisms to promote automated technologies. These results will help elucidate the steps that organizations like the Military can take to enhance warfighter buy-in and use of new technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS55548.2022.9799319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS55548.2022.9799319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

激励机制是用来鼓励某种行为的。激励机制可以是声誉激励(社会地位风险和奖励)、游戏化激励(非游戏环境中的游戏元素)和反馈激励(口头或文本反馈)。以往的研究表明,声誉激励和游戏化激励提供了外在激励(EM),而反馈激励提供了内在激励(IM)。激励机制的有效性各不相同,但大多数研究表明,收益激励是最有效的。用于促进自动化系统的使用、接受和采用的激励机制对于不想在未使用的系统上浪费资源的组织是有用的。鼓励使用、接受和采用自动化系统可以提高生产力、整体安全性和工作与生活的平衡。虽然这方面的研究很多,但不同的外部激励机制和外部激励机制的相对有效性尚未得到研究。本研究通过考察影响IM和EM的激励机制的有效性来填补这一空白。目前的研究利用声誉激励、游戏化激励、反馈激励和对照组来比较无人机(UAV)在模拟人质救援任务中的使用、接受和采用。数据收集了参与者使用该系统的频率。在人质营救任务之后,参与者收到了测量动机、接受度和接受度的问卷。本研究提供了IM和em为基础的激励机制对促进自动化技术的相对影响。这些结果将有助于阐明像军方这样的组织可以采取的步骤,以增强作战人员对新技术的购买和使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use, Acceptance, and Adoption of Automated Systems with Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation Based Incentive Mechanisms
Incentive mechanisms are used to encourage a behavior. Incentive mechanisms can be reputation incentives (social standing risks and rewards), gamification incentives (game-based elements in non-gaming environments), and feedback incentives (verbal or text feedback). Previous research suggests that reputation and gamification incentives provide extrinsic motivation (EM), while feedback incentives provide intrinsic motivation (IM). Incentive mechanisms vary in effectiveness, but most studies indicate that IM yielding incentives are most effective. Incentive mechanisms used to promote the use, acceptance, and adoption of automated systems can prove useful to organizations that do not want to waste resources on unused systems. Incentivizing the use, acceptance, and adoption of automated systems can enhance productivity, overall safety, and work-life balance. Though there are many studies on these topics, the relative effectiveness of different IM and EM incentive mechanisms has not been studied. This study fills that gap by examining the effectiveness of incentive mechanisms that affect IM and EM. The current study utilized reputation incentives, gamification incentives, feedback incentives, and a control group to compare the use, acceptance, and adoption of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) in a simulated hostage rescue task. Data were collected on how frequently participants used the system. Following the hostage rescue task, participants were given questionnaires measuring motivation, acceptance, and adoption. This study provides insight into the relative influence of IM and EM-based incentive mechanisms to promote automated technologies. These results will help elucidate the steps that organizations like the Military can take to enhance warfighter buy-in and use of new technologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Linville Creek Bridge: A Case Study of Design Thinking in Structural Engineering Convergence Across Behavioral and Self-report Measures Evaluating Individuals' Trust in an Autonomous Golf Cart Investigating the Illicit Trade of Cultural Property with an Automated Data Pipeline Architecture Investigating Disinformation Through the Lens of Mass Media: A System Design Dynamic Coal Production Line: Plant Design and Analysis Tool
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1