大规模设计公正的解决方案:无律师法律服务和循证监管

Matthew Burnett, Rebecca L. Sandefur
{"title":"大规模设计公正的解决方案:无律师法律服务和循证监管","authors":"Matthew Burnett, Rebecca L. Sandefur","doi":"10.11117/rdp.v19i102.6604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Around the world, billions of people lack access to justice, often because they cannot access help in resolving their justice issues. An important reason for this is that many access models rely centrally on lawyers, and such models simply cannot scale. Some jurisdictions allow lawyerless legal services. We offer a new framework for understanding lawyerless legal services that breaks away from lawyer-centric logic. Inspired by experiments in reregulating the practice of law in the United States, we propose a paradigm shift: just solutions. A just solutions framework has two distinct characteristics: it is evidence-based and it is outcome-focused. We draw on experience from other lawyerless models to imagine what a just solutions framework could look like in practice, including a growing body of evidence on legal needs and effective services, as well as scalable funding innovations. Freed from the lawyer-centric paradigm, a just solutions framework is closer to people’s actual needs and, unlike the lawyer-centric model, has the potential to scale to meet them. \nKEYWORDS: Legal services; access to justice; unbundling; regulatory reform; evidence-based policy and practice.","PeriodicalId":186819,"journal":{"name":"Direito Público","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing Just Solutions at Scale: Lawyerless Legal Services and Evidence-Based Regulation\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Burnett, Rebecca L. Sandefur\",\"doi\":\"10.11117/rdp.v19i102.6604\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Around the world, billions of people lack access to justice, often because they cannot access help in resolving their justice issues. An important reason for this is that many access models rely centrally on lawyers, and such models simply cannot scale. Some jurisdictions allow lawyerless legal services. We offer a new framework for understanding lawyerless legal services that breaks away from lawyer-centric logic. Inspired by experiments in reregulating the practice of law in the United States, we propose a paradigm shift: just solutions. A just solutions framework has two distinct characteristics: it is evidence-based and it is outcome-focused. We draw on experience from other lawyerless models to imagine what a just solutions framework could look like in practice, including a growing body of evidence on legal needs and effective services, as well as scalable funding innovations. Freed from the lawyer-centric paradigm, a just solutions framework is closer to people’s actual needs and, unlike the lawyer-centric model, has the potential to scale to meet them. \\nKEYWORDS: Legal services; access to justice; unbundling; regulatory reform; evidence-based policy and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Direito Público\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Direito Público\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11117/rdp.v19i102.6604\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Direito Público","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11117/rdp.v19i102.6604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在世界各地,数十亿人无法诉诸司法,往往是因为他们无法获得解决其司法问题的帮助。造成这种情况的一个重要原因是,许多访问模型集中依赖于代理,而这些模型根本无法扩展。一些司法管辖区允许无律师法律服务。我们提供了一个新的框架来理解无律师的法律服务,打破了以律师为中心的逻辑。受美国重新规范法律实践的实验启发,我们提出了一种范式转变:公正的解决方案。公正解决方案框架有两个明显的特点:以证据为基础,注重结果。我们借鉴其他无律师模式的经验,设想一个公正的解决方案框架在实践中可能是什么样子,包括越来越多的关于法律需求和有效服务的证据,以及可扩展的融资创新。从以律师为中心的范式中解放出来,公正的解决方案框架更接近人们的实际需求,并且与以律师为中心的模式不同,它具有扩展以满足这些需求的潜力。关键词:法律服务;诉诸司法;拆分;监管改革;基于证据的政策和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Designing Just Solutions at Scale: Lawyerless Legal Services and Evidence-Based Regulation
Around the world, billions of people lack access to justice, often because they cannot access help in resolving their justice issues. An important reason for this is that many access models rely centrally on lawyers, and such models simply cannot scale. Some jurisdictions allow lawyerless legal services. We offer a new framework for understanding lawyerless legal services that breaks away from lawyer-centric logic. Inspired by experiments in reregulating the practice of law in the United States, we propose a paradigm shift: just solutions. A just solutions framework has two distinct characteristics: it is evidence-based and it is outcome-focused. We draw on experience from other lawyerless models to imagine what a just solutions framework could look like in practice, including a growing body of evidence on legal needs and effective services, as well as scalable funding innovations. Freed from the lawyer-centric paradigm, a just solutions framework is closer to people’s actual needs and, unlike the lawyer-centric model, has the potential to scale to meet them. KEYWORDS: Legal services; access to justice; unbundling; regulatory reform; evidence-based policy and practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Inteligência Artificial e Direitos Humanos: uma Avaliação Ética nos Negócios Método Transfeminista de Reescrita de Decisões Judiciais La Metodología Para Construir El Libro “Sentencias Feministas: Reescribiendo La Justicia Con Perspectiva De Género. Proyecto México Decisões Judiciais na Suprema Corte do Reino Unido Carta Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1