互补卡尔曼滤波与SLAM在异质多机器人团队协同定位中的比较

Benjamin Abruzzo, D. Cappelleri, Philippos Mordohai
{"title":"互补卡尔曼滤波与SLAM在异质多机器人团队协同定位中的比较","authors":"Benjamin Abruzzo, D. Cappelleri, Philippos Mordohai","doi":"10.1115/1.4054817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents an investigation of collaborative localization for heterogeneous robots, resulting in a scheme for relative localization of a heterogeneous team of lowcost mobile robots. A novel complementary Kalman Filter (CKF) approach is presented to address collaborative localization and mapping by optimally estimating the error states of the team. This indirect filter optimally combines the inertial/visual proprioceptive measurements of each vehicle with stereoscopic measurements made by the UGVs. An analysis is presented for both Complementary Kalman Filter (CKF) and Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) approaches on maps containing randomly placed obstacles. In both simulation and experiments, we demonstrate the proposed methodology with a heterogeneous robot team. Six behavioral strategies, specifying the role and behavior of each robot, are simulated and evaluated for both CKF and SLAM approaches on maps containing randomly placed obstacles. Results show that the sources of error, image quantization, asynchronous sensors, and a non-stationary bias, were sufficiently modeled to estimate the pose of the aerial robot. The results demonstrate localization accuracies of 2 cm to 4 cm, on average, while the robots operate at a distance from each-other between 1 m and 4 m. The best performing behavior for the CKF approach maintained an average positional error of 2.2 cm and a relative error of 0.30% of the distance traveled for the entire team at the conclusion of maneuvers. For all multi-UGV strategies, the CKF approach outperformed the best SLAM results by 6.7 cm mean error (0.48% of distance traveled).","PeriodicalId":164923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Complementary Kalman Filters Against SLAM for Collaborative Localization of Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Teams\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Abruzzo, D. Cappelleri, Philippos Mordohai\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4054817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper presents an investigation of collaborative localization for heterogeneous robots, resulting in a scheme for relative localization of a heterogeneous team of lowcost mobile robots. A novel complementary Kalman Filter (CKF) approach is presented to address collaborative localization and mapping by optimally estimating the error states of the team. This indirect filter optimally combines the inertial/visual proprioceptive measurements of each vehicle with stereoscopic measurements made by the UGVs. An analysis is presented for both Complementary Kalman Filter (CKF) and Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) approaches on maps containing randomly placed obstacles. In both simulation and experiments, we demonstrate the proposed methodology with a heterogeneous robot team. Six behavioral strategies, specifying the role and behavior of each robot, are simulated and evaluated for both CKF and SLAM approaches on maps containing randomly placed obstacles. Results show that the sources of error, image quantization, asynchronous sensors, and a non-stationary bias, were sufficiently modeled to estimate the pose of the aerial robot. The results demonstrate localization accuracies of 2 cm to 4 cm, on average, while the robots operate at a distance from each-other between 1 m and 4 m. The best performing behavior for the CKF approach maintained an average positional error of 2.2 cm and a relative error of 0.30% of the distance traveled for the entire team at the conclusion of maneuvers. For all multi-UGV strategies, the CKF approach outperformed the best SLAM results by 6.7 cm mean error (0.48% of distance traveled).\",\"PeriodicalId\":164923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054817\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了异构机器人的协同定位问题,提出了一种低成本移动机器人异构团队的相对定位方案。提出了一种新的互补卡尔曼滤波(CKF)方法,通过最优估计团队的错误状态来解决协作定位和映射问题。这种间接过滤器将每辆车的惯性/视觉本体感受测量与ugv的立体测量最佳地结合在一起。分析了互补卡尔曼滤波(CKF)和同时定位与映射(SLAM)方法在包含随机障碍物的地图上的应用。在仿真和实验中,我们用一个异构机器人团队演示了所提出的方法。在包含随机放置障碍物的地图上,对CKF和SLAM方法的六种行为策略进行了模拟和评估,具体说明了每个机器人的角色和行为。结果表明,对误差来源、图像量化、异步传感器和非平稳偏差进行了充分的建模,以估计空中机器人的姿态。结果表明,当机器人彼此之间的距离在1米到4米之间时,定位精度平均为2厘米到4厘米。CKF入路的最佳表现是保持了2.2 cm的平均位置误差和整个团队在演习结束时行进距离的0.30%的相对误差。对于所有多ugv策略,CKF方法比最佳SLAM结果平均误差6.7 cm(行进距离的0.48%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing Complementary Kalman Filters Against SLAM for Collaborative Localization of Heterogeneous Multi-Robot Teams
This paper presents an investigation of collaborative localization for heterogeneous robots, resulting in a scheme for relative localization of a heterogeneous team of lowcost mobile robots. A novel complementary Kalman Filter (CKF) approach is presented to address collaborative localization and mapping by optimally estimating the error states of the team. This indirect filter optimally combines the inertial/visual proprioceptive measurements of each vehicle with stereoscopic measurements made by the UGVs. An analysis is presented for both Complementary Kalman Filter (CKF) and Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) approaches on maps containing randomly placed obstacles. In both simulation and experiments, we demonstrate the proposed methodology with a heterogeneous robot team. Six behavioral strategies, specifying the role and behavior of each robot, are simulated and evaluated for both CKF and SLAM approaches on maps containing randomly placed obstacles. Results show that the sources of error, image quantization, asynchronous sensors, and a non-stationary bias, were sufficiently modeled to estimate the pose of the aerial robot. The results demonstrate localization accuracies of 2 cm to 4 cm, on average, while the robots operate at a distance from each-other between 1 m and 4 m. The best performing behavior for the CKF approach maintained an average positional error of 2.2 cm and a relative error of 0.30% of the distance traveled for the entire team at the conclusion of maneuvers. For all multi-UGV strategies, the CKF approach outperformed the best SLAM results by 6.7 cm mean error (0.48% of distance traveled).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Enhance Road Detection Data Processing of LiDAR Point Clouds to Specifically Identify Unmarked Gravel Rural Roads Tracking Algorithm Application Integrating Visual and Radar Information in Intelligent Vehicle Target Tracking Simulation Study on Hydraulic Braking Control of Engine Motor of Hybrid Electric Vehicle Robust Visual SLAM in Dynamic Environment Based on Motion Detection and Segmentation Two-Carrier Cooperative Parking Robot: Design and Implementation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1