{"title":"列斯科夫欧亚概念中的欧亚文化“尼布甲尼撒原型”:对现代俄罗斯的启示","authors":"Rosamond Eileen O’Néill","doi":"10.55269/eurcrossrd.2.020310110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his literary works, the prominent Russian writer Nikolay Semenovich Leskov (1831-1895) introduced the concept of “Nebuchadnezzar’s archetype” of Russian mentality, that is, according to Leskov, a Eurasian mentality. Leskov opposed “holy foolishness,” a part of the described Eurasian archetype, to European rationality that distanced itself from God as a result of Enlightenment. However, the writer distinguished between the “holy foolishness” for God’s sake, a constituent of Russian mentality, and the “holy foolishness” for own sake, a component of Russian official state politics, that he regarded as an absolute evil. In “Nebuchadnezzar’s archetype,” Nikolay Leskov saw a reaction of the Russian national mentality to a number of heavy military and diplomatic defeats of Russian Empire caused by Europe in the mid-nineteenth century (e.g. Crimean war, Russo-Turkish war of 1877-1878). After these defeats, according to Leskov, Russian nation turned to its Eurasian origins, while Russian government kept loyalty to European-style of politics. In the article, I demonstrate the implications of Leskov’s concept of “Nebuchdnezzar’s archetype” for understanding and classifying modern Russian politics in Eurasian space.","PeriodicalId":222421,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Crossroads","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Nebuchadnezzar Archetype” of Eurasian Cultures in Nikolay Leskov’s Eurasian Concept: Implications for Modern Russia\",\"authors\":\"Rosamond Eileen O’Néill\",\"doi\":\"10.55269/eurcrossrd.2.020310110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In his literary works, the prominent Russian writer Nikolay Semenovich Leskov (1831-1895) introduced the concept of “Nebuchadnezzar’s archetype” of Russian mentality, that is, according to Leskov, a Eurasian mentality. Leskov opposed “holy foolishness,” a part of the described Eurasian archetype, to European rationality that distanced itself from God as a result of Enlightenment. However, the writer distinguished between the “holy foolishness” for God’s sake, a constituent of Russian mentality, and the “holy foolishness” for own sake, a component of Russian official state politics, that he regarded as an absolute evil. In “Nebuchadnezzar’s archetype,” Nikolay Leskov saw a reaction of the Russian national mentality to a number of heavy military and diplomatic defeats of Russian Empire caused by Europe in the mid-nineteenth century (e.g. Crimean war, Russo-Turkish war of 1877-1878). After these defeats, according to Leskov, Russian nation turned to its Eurasian origins, while Russian government kept loyalty to European-style of politics. In the article, I demonstrate the implications of Leskov’s concept of “Nebuchdnezzar’s archetype” for understanding and classifying modern Russian politics in Eurasian space.\",\"PeriodicalId\":222421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasian Crossroads\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasian Crossroads\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55269/eurcrossrd.2.020310110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Crossroads","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55269/eurcrossrd.2.020310110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
“Nebuchadnezzar Archetype” of Eurasian Cultures in Nikolay Leskov’s Eurasian Concept: Implications for Modern Russia
In his literary works, the prominent Russian writer Nikolay Semenovich Leskov (1831-1895) introduced the concept of “Nebuchadnezzar’s archetype” of Russian mentality, that is, according to Leskov, a Eurasian mentality. Leskov opposed “holy foolishness,” a part of the described Eurasian archetype, to European rationality that distanced itself from God as a result of Enlightenment. However, the writer distinguished between the “holy foolishness” for God’s sake, a constituent of Russian mentality, and the “holy foolishness” for own sake, a component of Russian official state politics, that he regarded as an absolute evil. In “Nebuchadnezzar’s archetype,” Nikolay Leskov saw a reaction of the Russian national mentality to a number of heavy military and diplomatic defeats of Russian Empire caused by Europe in the mid-nineteenth century (e.g. Crimean war, Russo-Turkish war of 1877-1878). After these defeats, according to Leskov, Russian nation turned to its Eurasian origins, while Russian government kept loyalty to European-style of politics. In the article, I demonstrate the implications of Leskov’s concept of “Nebuchdnezzar’s archetype” for understanding and classifying modern Russian politics in Eurasian space.