列斯科夫欧亚概念中的欧亚文化“尼布甲尼撒原型”:对现代俄罗斯的启示

Rosamond Eileen O’Néill
{"title":"列斯科夫欧亚概念中的欧亚文化“尼布甲尼撒原型”:对现代俄罗斯的启示","authors":"Rosamond Eileen O’Néill","doi":"10.55269/eurcrossrd.2.020310110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his literary works, the prominent Russian writer Nikolay Semenovich Leskov (1831-1895) introduced the concept of “Nebuchadnezzar’s archetype” of Russian mentality, that is, according to Leskov, a Eurasian mentality. Leskov opposed “holy foolishness,” a part of the described Eurasian archetype, to European rationality that distanced itself from God as a result of Enlightenment. However, the writer distinguished between the “holy foolishness” for God’s sake, a constituent of Russian mentality, and the “holy foolishness” for own sake, a component of Russian official state politics, that he regarded as an absolute evil. In “Nebuchadnezzar’s archetype,” Nikolay Leskov saw a reaction of the Russian national mentality to a number of heavy military and diplomatic defeats of Russian Empire caused by Europe in the mid-nineteenth century (e.g. Crimean war, Russo-Turkish war of 1877-1878). After these defeats, according to Leskov, Russian nation turned to its Eurasian origins, while Russian government kept loyalty to European-style of politics. In the article, I demonstrate the implications of Leskov’s concept of “Nebuchdnezzar’s archetype” for understanding and classifying modern Russian politics in Eurasian space.","PeriodicalId":222421,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Crossroads","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Nebuchadnezzar Archetype” of Eurasian Cultures in Nikolay Leskov’s Eurasian Concept: Implications for Modern Russia\",\"authors\":\"Rosamond Eileen O’Néill\",\"doi\":\"10.55269/eurcrossrd.2.020310110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In his literary works, the prominent Russian writer Nikolay Semenovich Leskov (1831-1895) introduced the concept of “Nebuchadnezzar’s archetype” of Russian mentality, that is, according to Leskov, a Eurasian mentality. Leskov opposed “holy foolishness,” a part of the described Eurasian archetype, to European rationality that distanced itself from God as a result of Enlightenment. However, the writer distinguished between the “holy foolishness” for God’s sake, a constituent of Russian mentality, and the “holy foolishness” for own sake, a component of Russian official state politics, that he regarded as an absolute evil. In “Nebuchadnezzar’s archetype,” Nikolay Leskov saw a reaction of the Russian national mentality to a number of heavy military and diplomatic defeats of Russian Empire caused by Europe in the mid-nineteenth century (e.g. Crimean war, Russo-Turkish war of 1877-1878). After these defeats, according to Leskov, Russian nation turned to its Eurasian origins, while Russian government kept loyalty to European-style of politics. In the article, I demonstrate the implications of Leskov’s concept of “Nebuchdnezzar’s archetype” for understanding and classifying modern Russian politics in Eurasian space.\",\"PeriodicalId\":222421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eurasian Crossroads\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eurasian Crossroads\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55269/eurcrossrd.2.020310110\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Crossroads","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55269/eurcrossrd.2.020310110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

俄罗斯著名作家列斯科夫(Nikolay Semenovich Leskov, 1831-1895)在其文学作品中引入了俄罗斯心态的“尼布甲尼撒原型”概念,即按照列斯科夫的说法,是一种欧亚心态。列斯科夫反对“神圣的愚蠢”,这是所描述的欧亚原型的一部分,反对欧洲理性,因为启蒙运动而使自己与上帝保持距离。然而,作者区分了“神圣的愚蠢”和“神圣的愚蠢”,前者是为了上帝的缘故,是俄罗斯人心态的组成部分,后者是为了自己的缘故,是俄罗斯官方国家政治的组成部分,他认为这是绝对的邪恶。在《尼布甲尼撒的原型》中,尼古拉·列斯科夫看到了俄罗斯民族心理对19世纪中期欧洲对俄罗斯帝国造成的一系列重大军事和外交失败的反应(例如克里米亚战争、1877年至1878年的俄土战争)。根据列斯科夫的说法,在这些失败之后,俄罗斯民族转向了它的欧亚起源,而俄罗斯政府则保持了对欧洲政治风格的忠诚。在本文中,我论证了列斯科夫的“尼布甲尼撒原型”概念对于理解和分类欧亚空间中的现代俄罗斯政治的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Nebuchadnezzar Archetype” of Eurasian Cultures in Nikolay Leskov’s Eurasian Concept: Implications for Modern Russia
In his literary works, the prominent Russian writer Nikolay Semenovich Leskov (1831-1895) introduced the concept of “Nebuchadnezzar’s archetype” of Russian mentality, that is, according to Leskov, a Eurasian mentality. Leskov opposed “holy foolishness,” a part of the described Eurasian archetype, to European rationality that distanced itself from God as a result of Enlightenment. However, the writer distinguished between the “holy foolishness” for God’s sake, a constituent of Russian mentality, and the “holy foolishness” for own sake, a component of Russian official state politics, that he regarded as an absolute evil. In “Nebuchadnezzar’s archetype,” Nikolay Leskov saw a reaction of the Russian national mentality to a number of heavy military and diplomatic defeats of Russian Empire caused by Europe in the mid-nineteenth century (e.g. Crimean war, Russo-Turkish war of 1877-1878). After these defeats, according to Leskov, Russian nation turned to its Eurasian origins, while Russian government kept loyalty to European-style of politics. In the article, I demonstrate the implications of Leskov’s concept of “Nebuchdnezzar’s archetype” for understanding and classifying modern Russian politics in Eurasian space.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Beneficial Shock How Did Sapiens Really Come into Being in Eurasia and Where Is It Heading Right Now? Persecuting Orthodoxy in the Soviet Union as an Attempt of Destroying the Russia’s Eurasian Mission: An Example of Grigory Dolya and St Transfiguration Temple in Lednoe The Future of Eurasia: In the Vice between Transatlanticism and Chinese Expansion? Pre-Eurasian Motives in Russian Social Thought of the Nineteenth Century: Intersections of Chinese Influence as a Far East Culture and Egyptian Influence as a Mediterranean Culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1