欧洲人权法院对罗马尼亚作出的初步判决

C. Verga, George Bacovia
{"title":"欧洲人权法院对罗马尼亚作出的初步判决","authors":"C. Verga, George Bacovia","doi":"10.18662/lumenpses/6.2/22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article defines first the concept of pilot decision. Then it details the procedure employed in case of systemic or systematic violations of any right provided by the European Convention on Human Rights. Some relevant pilot judgments against certain member states of the Council of Europe are highlighted. Next, two pilot judgments delivered against Romania (Maria Atanasiu and Others v. Romania and Rezmives and Others v. Romania) are thoroughly examined. Finally, some relevant opinions on the subject are expressed. The issue is very topical for the Romanian state and the specialists in the field, precisely because of the consequences determined by the two analyzed pilot judgments.","PeriodicalId":180547,"journal":{"name":"Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Political Sciences & European Studies","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pilot Judgments Delivered by the European Court of Human Rights against Romania\",\"authors\":\"C. Verga, George Bacovia\",\"doi\":\"10.18662/lumenpses/6.2/22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article defines first the concept of pilot decision. Then it details the procedure employed in case of systemic or systematic violations of any right provided by the European Convention on Human Rights. Some relevant pilot judgments against certain member states of the Council of Europe are highlighted. Next, two pilot judgments delivered against Romania (Maria Atanasiu and Others v. Romania and Rezmives and Others v. Romania) are thoroughly examined. Finally, some relevant opinions on the subject are expressed. The issue is very topical for the Romanian state and the specialists in the field, precisely because of the consequences determined by the two analyzed pilot judgments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":180547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Political Sciences & European Studies\",\"volume\":\"136 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Political Sciences & European Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenpses/6.2/22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty: Political Sciences & European Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenpses/6.2/22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文首先界定了试点决策的概念。然后,它详细说明了在系统或系统地侵犯《欧洲人权公约》规定的任何权利的情况下所采用的程序。重点介绍了针对欧洲委员会某些成员国的一些相关试点判决。接下来,对两项针对罗马尼亚的试点判决(Maria Atanasiu及其他人诉罗马尼亚案和Rezmives及其他人诉罗马尼亚案)进行彻底审查。最后,就这一问题提出了一些相关的观点。对于罗马尼亚政府和该领域的专家来说,这个问题是非常热门的话题,正是因为两种分析后的飞行员判断所确定的后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pilot Judgments Delivered by the European Court of Human Rights against Romania
The article defines first the concept of pilot decision. Then it details the procedure employed in case of systemic or systematic violations of any right provided by the European Convention on Human Rights. Some relevant pilot judgments against certain member states of the Council of Europe are highlighted. Next, two pilot judgments delivered against Romania (Maria Atanasiu and Others v. Romania and Rezmives and Others v. Romania) are thoroughly examined. Finally, some relevant opinions on the subject are expressed. The issue is very topical for the Romanian state and the specialists in the field, precisely because of the consequences determined by the two analyzed pilot judgments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SARS-COV2 as Trigger for Reviewing Strategic and Operational Public Administration Frameworks The Use of Mass Media in the Social Welfare Area Review on “Costuri sociale ale migraţiei externe din România”, authored by Daniela Petronela FERARU, LUMEN Publishing House Presidential Elections in Post-December Romania - Bivalent Influences on Democratization Analysis of the Formation and Allocation of Resources Directed at Funding Environmental Projects and Programmes (EPP)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1