高等教育体系学习成果评估(德国经验)

С. А. Шункеева, Г.С Акыбаева, С.Д. Муканова
{"title":"高等教育体系学习成果评估(德国经验)","authors":"С. А. Шункеева, Г.С Акыбаева, С.Д. Муканова","doi":"10.31489/2022ped4/97-106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the results of the analysis of the best practice of learning outcomes assessment in the German higher education system. The analysis compares a wide range of approaches to learning outcomes assessment, lists assessment methods, the choice of which is determined by the tested competencies and the assessed learning outcomes. Assessment of learning outcomes is considered in the context of national qualification systems that operate with the category of «learning outcomes», including the concept of competence. In order to distinguish these concepts, the article discusses the use and meaning of the terms «learning outcomes» and «competencies». In addition, the emphasis is placed on the generally accepted definition of competence in European countries as a degree of independence and responsibility. As a result of the analysis of the practice of learning outcomes assessment in the German higher education system, the authors of the article highlight important points that can be borrowed or adapted to the conditions of the domestic higher education system: differentiation of learning outcomes in conformance with the levels of education according to B. Bloom's taxonomy; credits award (ECTS) for learning outcomes; widespread use of assessment methods and tools, described in the article; implementation of technological maps in the framework of learning outcomes assessment and etc.","PeriodicalId":336594,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Karaganda University. Pedagogy series","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of learning outcomes in the higher education system (from the experience of Germany)\",\"authors\":\"С. А. Шункеева, Г.С Акыбаева, С.Д. Муканова\",\"doi\":\"10.31489/2022ped4/97-106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article presents the results of the analysis of the best practice of learning outcomes assessment in the German higher education system. The analysis compares a wide range of approaches to learning outcomes assessment, lists assessment methods, the choice of which is determined by the tested competencies and the assessed learning outcomes. Assessment of learning outcomes is considered in the context of national qualification systems that operate with the category of «learning outcomes», including the concept of competence. In order to distinguish these concepts, the article discusses the use and meaning of the terms «learning outcomes» and «competencies». In addition, the emphasis is placed on the generally accepted definition of competence in European countries as a degree of independence and responsibility. As a result of the analysis of the practice of learning outcomes assessment in the German higher education system, the authors of the article highlight important points that can be borrowed or adapted to the conditions of the domestic higher education system: differentiation of learning outcomes in conformance with the levels of education according to B. Bloom's taxonomy; credits award (ECTS) for learning outcomes; widespread use of assessment methods and tools, described in the article; implementation of technological maps in the framework of learning outcomes assessment and etc.\",\"PeriodicalId\":336594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Karaganda University. Pedagogy series\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Karaganda University. Pedagogy series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31489/2022ped4/97-106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Karaganda University. Pedagogy series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31489/2022ped4/97-106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了对德国高等教育体系学习成果评估最佳实践的分析结果。分析比较了广泛的学习成果评估方法,列出了评估方法,其中的选择是由测试的能力和评估的学习成果决定的。学习成果评估是在以“学习成果”类别运作的国家资格体系背景下考虑的,包括能力的概念。为了区分这些概念,本文讨论了术语“学习成果”和“能力”的用法和含义。此外,重点放在欧洲国家普遍接受的能力的定义上,即一定程度的独立和责任。通过对德国高等教育体系中学习成果评估实践的分析,本文作者强调了可以借鉴或适应国内高等教育体系条件的重要观点:根据B. Bloom的分类法对符合教育层次的学习成果进行区分;学习成果学分奖励(ECTS);广泛使用的评估方法和工具,在文章中描述;技术地图在学习成果评估等框架下的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of learning outcomes in the higher education system (from the experience of Germany)
The article presents the results of the analysis of the best practice of learning outcomes assessment in the German higher education system. The analysis compares a wide range of approaches to learning outcomes assessment, lists assessment methods, the choice of which is determined by the tested competencies and the assessed learning outcomes. Assessment of learning outcomes is considered in the context of national qualification systems that operate with the category of «learning outcomes», including the concept of competence. In order to distinguish these concepts, the article discusses the use and meaning of the terms «learning outcomes» and «competencies». In addition, the emphasis is placed on the generally accepted definition of competence in European countries as a degree of independence and responsibility. As a result of the analysis of the practice of learning outcomes assessment in the German higher education system, the authors of the article highlight important points that can be borrowed or adapted to the conditions of the domestic higher education system: differentiation of learning outcomes in conformance with the levels of education according to B. Bloom's taxonomy; credits award (ECTS) for learning outcomes; widespread use of assessment methods and tools, described in the article; implementation of technological maps in the framework of learning outcomes assessment and etc.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Эффективность применения таксономии Б. Блума при обучении студентов русскому языку как неродному Development of soft skills of high school students as an opportunity to implement the requirements of modern education Реализация конструктивистского подхода к обучению при разработке приложений виртуальной и дополненной реальности Профессиональная ориентация обучающихся в Казахстане в фокусе инклюзивности Оқушылардың жоғары деңгейдегі ойлау дағдыларын сұрақ қою әдісі арқылы қалыптастыру жолдары
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1