银行净息差和盈利能力对信贷、利率和期限结构冲击的敏感性

G. Hanweck, Lisa Ryu
{"title":"银行净息差和盈利能力对信贷、利率和期限结构冲击的敏感性","authors":"G. Hanweck, Lisa Ryu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.886727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a dynamic model of bank behavior that explains net interest margin changes for different groups of banks in response to credit, interest-rate, and term-structure shocks. Using quarterly data from 1986 to 2003, we find that banks with different product-line specializations and asset sizes respond in predictable yet fundamentally dissimilar ways to these shocks. Banks in most bank groups are sensitive in varying degrees to credit, interest-rate, and term-structure shocks. Large and more diversified banks seem to be less sensitive to interest- rate and term-structure shocks, but more sensitive to credit shocks. We also find that the composition of assets and liabilities, in terms of their repricing frequencies, helps amplify or moderate the effects of changes and volatility in short-term interest rates on bank net interest margins, depending on the direction of the repricing mismatch. We also analyze subsample periods that represent different legislative, regulatory, and economic environments and find that most banks continue to be sensitive to credit, interest-rate, and term-structure shocks. However, the sensitivity to term-structure shocks seems to have lessened over time for certain groups of banks, although the results are not universal. In addition, our results show that banks in general are not able to hedge fully against interest-rate volatility. The sensitivity of net interest margins to interest-rate volatility for different groups of banks varies across subsample periods; this varying sensitivity could reflect interest-rate regime shifts as well as the degree of hedging activities and market competition. Finally, by investigating the sensitivity of ROA to interest-rate and credit shocks, we have some evidence that banks of different specializations were able to price actual and expected changes in credit risk more efficiently in the recent period than in previous periods. These results also demonstrate that banks of all specializations try to offset adverse changes in net interest margins so as to mute their effect on reported after-tax earnings.","PeriodicalId":142280,"journal":{"name":"George Mason University School of Business Research Paper Series","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"65","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Sensitivity of Bank Net Interest Margins and Profitability To Credit, Interest-Rate, and Term-Structure Shocks Across Bank Product Specializations\",\"authors\":\"G. Hanweck, Lisa Ryu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.886727\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a dynamic model of bank behavior that explains net interest margin changes for different groups of banks in response to credit, interest-rate, and term-structure shocks. Using quarterly data from 1986 to 2003, we find that banks with different product-line specializations and asset sizes respond in predictable yet fundamentally dissimilar ways to these shocks. Banks in most bank groups are sensitive in varying degrees to credit, interest-rate, and term-structure shocks. Large and more diversified banks seem to be less sensitive to interest- rate and term-structure shocks, but more sensitive to credit shocks. We also find that the composition of assets and liabilities, in terms of their repricing frequencies, helps amplify or moderate the effects of changes and volatility in short-term interest rates on bank net interest margins, depending on the direction of the repricing mismatch. We also analyze subsample periods that represent different legislative, regulatory, and economic environments and find that most banks continue to be sensitive to credit, interest-rate, and term-structure shocks. However, the sensitivity to term-structure shocks seems to have lessened over time for certain groups of banks, although the results are not universal. In addition, our results show that banks in general are not able to hedge fully against interest-rate volatility. The sensitivity of net interest margins to interest-rate volatility for different groups of banks varies across subsample periods; this varying sensitivity could reflect interest-rate regime shifts as well as the degree of hedging activities and market competition. Finally, by investigating the sensitivity of ROA to interest-rate and credit shocks, we have some evidence that banks of different specializations were able to price actual and expected changes in credit risk more efficiently in the recent period than in previous periods. These results also demonstrate that banks of all specializations try to offset adverse changes in net interest margins so as to mute their effect on reported after-tax earnings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"George Mason University School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"65\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"George Mason University School of Business Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.886727\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"George Mason University School of Business Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.886727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

摘要

本文提出了一个银行行为的动态模型,解释了不同银行群体在应对信贷、利率和期限结构冲击时的净息差变化。利用1986年至2003年的季度数据,我们发现,不同产品线专业化和资产规模的银行对这些冲击的反应是可预测的,但从根本上是不同的。大多数银行集团的银行对信贷、利率和期限结构冲击都有不同程度的敏感。大型和更多元化的银行似乎对利率和期限结构冲击不太敏感,但对信贷冲击更敏感。我们还发现,资产和负债的构成,就其重新定价频率而言,有助于放大或缓和短期利率变化和波动对银行净息差的影响,这取决于重新定价错配的方向。我们还分析了代表不同立法、监管和经济环境的子样本时期,发现大多数银行继续对信贷、利率和期限结构冲击敏感。然而,随着时间的推移,某些银行对期限结构冲击的敏感性似乎有所降低,尽管结果并不普遍。此外,我们的结果表明,银行一般不能完全对冲利率波动。不同银行组的净息差对利率波动的敏感性在子样本期间各不相同;这种不同的敏感性可以反映利率机制的变化,以及对冲活动和市场竞争的程度。最后,通过调查ROA对利率和信贷冲击的敏感性,我们有一些证据表明,不同专业的银行在最近一段时间内能够比以前更有效地定价实际和预期的信贷风险变化。这些结果还表明,所有专业的银行都试图抵消净息差的不利变化,以减弱其对报告的税后收益的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Sensitivity of Bank Net Interest Margins and Profitability To Credit, Interest-Rate, and Term-Structure Shocks Across Bank Product Specializations
This paper presents a dynamic model of bank behavior that explains net interest margin changes for different groups of banks in response to credit, interest-rate, and term-structure shocks. Using quarterly data from 1986 to 2003, we find that banks with different product-line specializations and asset sizes respond in predictable yet fundamentally dissimilar ways to these shocks. Banks in most bank groups are sensitive in varying degrees to credit, interest-rate, and term-structure shocks. Large and more diversified banks seem to be less sensitive to interest- rate and term-structure shocks, but more sensitive to credit shocks. We also find that the composition of assets and liabilities, in terms of their repricing frequencies, helps amplify or moderate the effects of changes and volatility in short-term interest rates on bank net interest margins, depending on the direction of the repricing mismatch. We also analyze subsample periods that represent different legislative, regulatory, and economic environments and find that most banks continue to be sensitive to credit, interest-rate, and term-structure shocks. However, the sensitivity to term-structure shocks seems to have lessened over time for certain groups of banks, although the results are not universal. In addition, our results show that banks in general are not able to hedge fully against interest-rate volatility. The sensitivity of net interest margins to interest-rate volatility for different groups of banks varies across subsample periods; this varying sensitivity could reflect interest-rate regime shifts as well as the degree of hedging activities and market competition. Finally, by investigating the sensitivity of ROA to interest-rate and credit shocks, we have some evidence that banks of different specializations were able to price actual and expected changes in credit risk more efficiently in the recent period than in previous periods. These results also demonstrate that banks of all specializations try to offset adverse changes in net interest margins so as to mute their effect on reported after-tax earnings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How Controlling Failure Perceptions Affects Performance: Evidence from a Field Experiment The Regulatory Observer Effect: Evidence from SEC Investigations The Doctor will See You Elsewhere: Enterprise Information Systems and the Changing Control of Firm Activities Audited Financial Reporting and Voluntary Disclosure of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Reports Servicers and Mortgage-Backed Securities Default: Theory and Evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1