韧带真的“脱落”了吗?

Diego García-Germán Vázquez , Diego López González , Marta García Vega
{"title":"韧带真的“脱落”了吗?","authors":"Diego García-Germán Vázquez ,&nbsp;Diego López González ,&nbsp;Marta García Vega","doi":"10.1016/j.reaca.2015.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The concept of a “fallen” Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) refers to the wrong conception of the native ACL based on the orientation, tension and appearance of a transtibial, non-anatomic, vertical ACL graft. This appearance could be considered as the appearance of a normal ligament. When, later, we see an uninjured ACL, anatomically orientated and inserted in its footprint, we could think of it as “fallen”. The fact is that that is its anatomic insertion.</p><p>The tension pattern can also confuse us because that of the native ligament varies throughout the range of flexion-extension whilst non-anatomic grafts, being isometric, are always tense.</p><p>The fact that the study of the anatomy as well as imaging tests are done with the knee in full extension but arthroscopy is performed with the knee in 90° of flexion adds confusión to the perception of the uninjured ligament.</p><p>We must discard the concept of the “fallen” ligament and take this opportunity to better understand the anatomy of the femoral footprint, the tension, and the real orientation of the ligament.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101107,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espa?ola de Artroscopia y Cirugía Articular","volume":"22 2","pages":"Pages 105-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.reaca.2015.05.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"¿Está el ligamento realmente «caído»?\",\"authors\":\"Diego García-Germán Vázquez ,&nbsp;Diego López González ,&nbsp;Marta García Vega\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.reaca.2015.05.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The concept of a “fallen” Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) refers to the wrong conception of the native ACL based on the orientation, tension and appearance of a transtibial, non-anatomic, vertical ACL graft. This appearance could be considered as the appearance of a normal ligament. When, later, we see an uninjured ACL, anatomically orientated and inserted in its footprint, we could think of it as “fallen”. The fact is that that is its anatomic insertion.</p><p>The tension pattern can also confuse us because that of the native ligament varies throughout the range of flexion-extension whilst non-anatomic grafts, being isometric, are always tense.</p><p>The fact that the study of the anatomy as well as imaging tests are done with the knee in full extension but arthroscopy is performed with the knee in 90° of flexion adds confusión to the perception of the uninjured ligament.</p><p>We must discard the concept of the “fallen” ligament and take this opportunity to better understand the anatomy of the femoral footprint, the tension, and the real orientation of the ligament.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Espa?ola de Artroscopia y Cirugía Articular\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 105-109\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.reaca.2015.05.002\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Espa?ola de Artroscopia y Cirugía Articular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2386312915000286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espa?ola de Artroscopia y Cirugía Articular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2386312915000286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“脱落”前交叉韧带(ACL)的概念是指基于跨胫、非解剖、垂直ACL移植物的方向、张力和外观对原生ACL的错误概念。这种外观可以被认为是正常韧带的外观。后来,当我们看到一个未受伤的前交叉韧带,解剖定位并插入其足迹时,我们可以认为它“倒下了”。事实上,这是它的解剖插入点。张力模式也会使我们感到困惑,因为在整个屈伸范围内,天然韧带的张力是不同的,而非解剖性移植物是等距的,总是紧张的。解剖研究和影像学检查是在膝关节完全伸展的情况下进行的,而关节镜检查是在膝关节屈曲90°的情况下进行的,这一事实增加了confusión对未受伤韧带的感知。我们必须抛弃“脱落”韧带的概念,并借此机会更好地了解股足迹的解剖结构、张力和韧带的真实方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
¿Está el ligamento realmente «caído»?

The concept of a “fallen” Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) refers to the wrong conception of the native ACL based on the orientation, tension and appearance of a transtibial, non-anatomic, vertical ACL graft. This appearance could be considered as the appearance of a normal ligament. When, later, we see an uninjured ACL, anatomically orientated and inserted in its footprint, we could think of it as “fallen”. The fact is that that is its anatomic insertion.

The tension pattern can also confuse us because that of the native ligament varies throughout the range of flexion-extension whilst non-anatomic grafts, being isometric, are always tense.

The fact that the study of the anatomy as well as imaging tests are done with the knee in full extension but arthroscopy is performed with the knee in 90° of flexion adds confusión to the perception of the uninjured ligament.

We must discard the concept of the “fallen” ligament and take this opportunity to better understand the anatomy of the femoral footprint, the tension, and the real orientation of the ligament.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reinserción simultánea de raíz posterior de menisco externo y anterior del interno con plastia de ligamento cruzado anterior asociada Tratamiento artroscópico de la luxación posterior crónica de hombro. Técnica quirúrgica y presentación de 2 casos Complicaciones en artroscopia de cadera. Artroscopia fallida de cadera y artroscopia de revisión ¿Por qué seguir publicando en REACA? Tratamiento artroscópico versus tratamiento mediante cirugía abierta de la epicondilitis lateral. Estudio de cohortes prospectivo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1