BugCache检查:命中或错过?

Foyzur Rahman, Daryl Posnett, Abram Hindle, Earl T. Barr, Premkumar T. Devanbu
{"title":"BugCache检查:命中或错过?","authors":"Foyzur Rahman, Daryl Posnett, Abram Hindle, Earl T. Barr, Premkumar T. Devanbu","doi":"10.1145/2025113.2025157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inspection is a highly effective but costly technique for quality control. Most companies do not have the resources to inspect all the code; thus accurate defect prediction can help focus available inspection resources. BugCache is a simple, elegant, award-winning prediction scheme that \"caches\" files that are likely to contain defects [12]. In this paper, we evaluate the utility of BugCache as a tool for focusing inspection, we examine the assumptions underlying BugCache with the aim of improving it, and finally we compare it with a simple, standard bug-prediction technique. We find that BugCache is, in fact, useful for focusing inspection effort; but surprisingly, we find that its performance, when used for inspections, is not much better than a naive prediction model -- viz., a model that orders files in the system by their count of closed bugs and chooses enough files to capture 20% of the lines in the system.","PeriodicalId":184518,"journal":{"name":"ESEC/FSE '11","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"117","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BugCache for inspections: hit or miss?\",\"authors\":\"Foyzur Rahman, Daryl Posnett, Abram Hindle, Earl T. Barr, Premkumar T. Devanbu\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2025113.2025157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inspection is a highly effective but costly technique for quality control. Most companies do not have the resources to inspect all the code; thus accurate defect prediction can help focus available inspection resources. BugCache is a simple, elegant, award-winning prediction scheme that \\\"caches\\\" files that are likely to contain defects [12]. In this paper, we evaluate the utility of BugCache as a tool for focusing inspection, we examine the assumptions underlying BugCache with the aim of improving it, and finally we compare it with a simple, standard bug-prediction technique. We find that BugCache is, in fact, useful for focusing inspection effort; but surprisingly, we find that its performance, when used for inspections, is not much better than a naive prediction model -- viz., a model that orders files in the system by their count of closed bugs and chooses enough files to capture 20% of the lines in the system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":184518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESEC/FSE '11\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"117\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESEC/FSE '11\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2025113.2025157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESEC/FSE '11","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2025113.2025157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 117

摘要

检验是一种非常有效但代价高昂的质量控制技术。大多数公司没有足够的资源来检查所有的代码;因此,准确的缺陷预测可以帮助集中可用的检查资源。BugCache是一个简单、优雅、屡获殊荣的预测方案,它“缓存”可能包含缺陷的文件[12]。在本文中,我们评估了BugCache作为聚焦检查工具的效用,我们检查了BugCache的基本假设,目的是改进它,最后我们将其与简单的标准bug预测技术进行比较。事实上,我们发现BugCache对于集中检查工作是有用的;但令人惊讶的是,我们发现,当用于检查时,它的性能并不比一个朴素的预测模型好多少——即,一个根据关闭错误的数量对系统中的文件进行排序的模型,并选择足够的文件来捕获系统中20%的行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BugCache for inspections: hit or miss?
Inspection is a highly effective but costly technique for quality control. Most companies do not have the resources to inspect all the code; thus accurate defect prediction can help focus available inspection resources. BugCache is a simple, elegant, award-winning prediction scheme that "caches" files that are likely to contain defects [12]. In this paper, we evaluate the utility of BugCache as a tool for focusing inspection, we examine the assumptions underlying BugCache with the aim of improving it, and finally we compare it with a simple, standard bug-prediction technique. We find that BugCache is, in fact, useful for focusing inspection effort; but surprisingly, we find that its performance, when used for inspections, is not much better than a naive prediction model -- viz., a model that orders files in the system by their count of closed bugs and chooses enough files to capture 20% of the lines in the system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Semistructured merge: rethinking merge in revision control systems The 4th international workshop on social software engineering (SSE'11) Don't touch my code!: examining the effects of ownership on software quality SCORE: a scalable concolic testing tool for reliable embedded software Modeling the HTML DOM and browser API in static analysis of JavaScript web applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1