身体政治研讨会中的物质女权主义实践

Rachel E. Stein
{"title":"身体政治研讨会中的物质女权主义实践","authors":"Rachel E. Stein","doi":"10.5406/femteacher.24.3.0213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© 2015 by the board of trustees of the university of ill inois In these teaching notes, I want to focus on two course projects in which students apply materialist feminist practices within a capstone women’s studies seminar entitled Body Politics. Undertaking these projects, students become more critically aware of gendered materialities that they had previously taken for granted as they deconstruct material aspects of our social environment that they find oppressive. Students also increase confidence in their power to modify certain oppressive aspects of our material world. Perhaps most importantly, the students enjoy these exercises and find them meaningful and transformative. I teach women’s studies courses at a small Franciscan liberal arts college, where conservative Catholic social norms and traditional gender norms prevail. Even many of our more politicized and activist students do not question the normative gendering of bodies and behaviors. I designed the capstone women’s studies seminar around the topic of Body Politics to encourage the students to engage the conservative ideologies and policies that condition female embodiment on campus. Additionally, I focus on female body issues because although my college’s emphasis on Catholic service for the less fortunate does cultivate student investment in the betterment of the community, it also often discourages women students from focusing on their own experiences of gender oppression: the traditional Catholic gender system defines a good woman as one who serves others and advocates for others, not herself. By addressing female corporeal experience, I encourage students to speak out for themselves, as themselves, and to become more aware of how embodiment and gendering pervade their lives. While most of the students who complete the women’s studies minor and who take this capstone course are cisgender, heterosexual women, lesbians, transmen, and gay and straight men also pursue the minor and take this class, and I encourage all students to bring their own social positions and perspectives to bear on our study of gendered embodiment. My curricular focus parallels a feminist turn toward materiality/corporeality in the twenty-first century. Published in 2008, the anthology Material Feminisms, edited by Stacy Alaimo and Susan Hekman, brings together a range of feminist scholars whose work focuses on the corporeality of the female body and its co-constitution or Material Feminist Practices in a Body Politics Seminar","PeriodicalId":287450,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Teacher","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Material Feminist Practices in a Body Politics Seminar\",\"authors\":\"Rachel E. Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/femteacher.24.3.0213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"© 2015 by the board of trustees of the university of ill inois In these teaching notes, I want to focus on two course projects in which students apply materialist feminist practices within a capstone women’s studies seminar entitled Body Politics. Undertaking these projects, students become more critically aware of gendered materialities that they had previously taken for granted as they deconstruct material aspects of our social environment that they find oppressive. Students also increase confidence in their power to modify certain oppressive aspects of our material world. Perhaps most importantly, the students enjoy these exercises and find them meaningful and transformative. I teach women’s studies courses at a small Franciscan liberal arts college, where conservative Catholic social norms and traditional gender norms prevail. Even many of our more politicized and activist students do not question the normative gendering of bodies and behaviors. I designed the capstone women’s studies seminar around the topic of Body Politics to encourage the students to engage the conservative ideologies and policies that condition female embodiment on campus. Additionally, I focus on female body issues because although my college’s emphasis on Catholic service for the less fortunate does cultivate student investment in the betterment of the community, it also often discourages women students from focusing on their own experiences of gender oppression: the traditional Catholic gender system defines a good woman as one who serves others and advocates for others, not herself. By addressing female corporeal experience, I encourage students to speak out for themselves, as themselves, and to become more aware of how embodiment and gendering pervade their lives. While most of the students who complete the women’s studies minor and who take this capstone course are cisgender, heterosexual women, lesbians, transmen, and gay and straight men also pursue the minor and take this class, and I encourage all students to bring their own social positions and perspectives to bear on our study of gendered embodiment. My curricular focus parallels a feminist turn toward materiality/corporeality in the twenty-first century. Published in 2008, the anthology Material Feminisms, edited by Stacy Alaimo and Susan Hekman, brings together a range of feminist scholars whose work focuses on the corporeality of the female body and its co-constitution or Material Feminist Practices in a Body Politics Seminar\",\"PeriodicalId\":287450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Feminist Teacher\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Feminist Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/femteacher.24.3.0213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/femteacher.24.3.0213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这些教学笔记中,我想把重点放在两个课程项目上,学生们在题为“身体政治”的顶点女性研究研讨会上应用唯物主义女权主义实践。通过这些项目,学生们变得更加批判性地意识到他们以前认为理所当然的性别物质,因为他们解构了他们认为压迫的社会环境的物质方面。学生们也增强了自信,相信自己有能力改变物质世界中某些令人压抑的方面。也许最重要的是,学生们喜欢这些练习,并发现它们有意义和变革。我在一所小型的方济会文理学院教授女性研究课程,在那里,保守的天主教社会规范和传统的性别规范占主导地位。甚至我们许多更政治化和激进的学生也不质疑身体和行为的规范性别。我围绕身体政治的主题设计了顶点女性研究研讨会,以鼓励学生参与校园中女性体现的保守意识形态和政策。此外,我之所以关注女性身体问题,是因为虽然我所在的大学强调天主教为弱势群体服务,这确实培养了学生在改善社区方面的投入,但这也经常阻碍女学生关注自己的性别压迫经历:传统的天主教性别体系将好女人定义为服务他人、为他人辩护的人,而不是自己。通过讨论女性的身体体验,我鼓励学生们为自己发声,以自己的身份发声,并更加意识到身体化和性别化如何渗透到她们的生活中。虽然大多数修完女性研究辅修课程的学生都是顺性别者,异性恋女性、女同性恋者、跨性别者、男同性恋和异性恋男性也修辅修课程,选修这门课,我鼓励所有学生把他们自己的社会立场和观点带到我们对性别体现的研究中来。我的课程重点与女权主义者在21世纪转向物质性/肉体性平行。2008年出版的《物质女权主义》选集由斯泰西·阿莱莫和苏珊·赫克曼编辑,汇集了一系列女权主义学者,他们的工作重点是女性身体的物质性及其共同构成,或者是身体政治研讨会上的物质女权主义实践
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Material Feminist Practices in a Body Politics Seminar
© 2015 by the board of trustees of the university of ill inois In these teaching notes, I want to focus on two course projects in which students apply materialist feminist practices within a capstone women’s studies seminar entitled Body Politics. Undertaking these projects, students become more critically aware of gendered materialities that they had previously taken for granted as they deconstruct material aspects of our social environment that they find oppressive. Students also increase confidence in their power to modify certain oppressive aspects of our material world. Perhaps most importantly, the students enjoy these exercises and find them meaningful and transformative. I teach women’s studies courses at a small Franciscan liberal arts college, where conservative Catholic social norms and traditional gender norms prevail. Even many of our more politicized and activist students do not question the normative gendering of bodies and behaviors. I designed the capstone women’s studies seminar around the topic of Body Politics to encourage the students to engage the conservative ideologies and policies that condition female embodiment on campus. Additionally, I focus on female body issues because although my college’s emphasis on Catholic service for the less fortunate does cultivate student investment in the betterment of the community, it also often discourages women students from focusing on their own experiences of gender oppression: the traditional Catholic gender system defines a good woman as one who serves others and advocates for others, not herself. By addressing female corporeal experience, I encourage students to speak out for themselves, as themselves, and to become more aware of how embodiment and gendering pervade their lives. While most of the students who complete the women’s studies minor and who take this capstone course are cisgender, heterosexual women, lesbians, transmen, and gay and straight men also pursue the minor and take this class, and I encourage all students to bring their own social positions and perspectives to bear on our study of gendered embodiment. My curricular focus parallels a feminist turn toward materiality/corporeality in the twenty-first century. Published in 2008, the anthology Material Feminisms, edited by Stacy Alaimo and Susan Hekman, brings together a range of feminist scholars whose work focuses on the corporeality of the female body and its co-constitution or Material Feminist Practices in a Body Politics Seminar
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Affinity, Collaboration, and the Politics of Classroom Speaking Burdens of Belonging Self-Silencing and Settling for Less in Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration on Behalf of Transgender Youth Performing Self, Performing Community, Performing Care: A Polyphony On the Im/possibilities of Anti-racist and Decolonial Publishing as Pedagogical Praxis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1