{"title":"精益建设中计划可靠性度量的回顾及数字化实践实施中的新度量","authors":"T. Nguyen, S. S. Waikar","doi":"10.24928/2018/0216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lean construction is increasingly being adopted in many countries as a means to improve construction project performance and productivity. Measuring the various improvements towards achieving the outcomes of reliability, preparedness, commitment and collaborative culture is crucial for a sustained successful practical implementation of Lean. Among various Lean techniques and tools, the Last Planner System (LPS) method has been widely used in construction projects for its simplicity and applicability to the construction environment. With LPS, the plan reliability is measured by Percent Plan Complete (PPC). The PPC as a single metric has been found to be insufficient in providing actionable information in understanding the root cause of challenges faced in different projects nor in improving the reliability nor in getting valid commitment of key project parties. It is also ineffective to symbolize as the metric to represent the preparedness, capacity or performance of the different sub-contractors. This paper aims to provide an in-depth review of PPC and other reliability measurements and their advantages and shortfalls for practical implementation. It reviews the symbolic representation of PPC to improvement through the application of Lean methods in construction from a planning and management perspective. From these analysis, this paper introduces a framework for practical implementation of Lean construction. It also proposes new metrics to supplement PPC to accurately represent plan reliability for better understanding of the root causes. The proposed indices are validated using data obtained from the digital application of Lean construction processes using Lean PlanDo. Lean PlanDo is digital tool embedded with Lean principles for construction planning and management based on LPS with a key emphasis on Value Stream Mapping (VSM) and constraint management. The proposed indices will provide the project teams with practical measurements and to build upon their understanding of Lean, measure the effectiveness of planning and the application of Lean methods in the project. 1 R&D Manager, Lean Station Ptd. Ltd., 73 JTC LauncPad Ayer Rajah Crescent, #02-27, Singapore, S139952, +6587483827, qui@leanstation.com 2 CEO, Co-founder, Lean Station Ptd. Ltd., 73 JTC LauncPad Ayer Rajah Crescent, #02-27, Singapore, S139952, +6597508940, sharath@leanstation.com Thi Qui Nguyen and Sharath Sridhar Waikar 1038 Proceedings IGLC-26, July 2018 | Chennai, India","PeriodicalId":419313,"journal":{"name":"26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Relook at Plan Reliability Measurements in Lean Construction and New Metrics From Digitized Practical Implementation\",\"authors\":\"T. Nguyen, S. S. Waikar\",\"doi\":\"10.24928/2018/0216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lean construction is increasingly being adopted in many countries as a means to improve construction project performance and productivity. Measuring the various improvements towards achieving the outcomes of reliability, preparedness, commitment and collaborative culture is crucial for a sustained successful practical implementation of Lean. Among various Lean techniques and tools, the Last Planner System (LPS) method has been widely used in construction projects for its simplicity and applicability to the construction environment. With LPS, the plan reliability is measured by Percent Plan Complete (PPC). The PPC as a single metric has been found to be insufficient in providing actionable information in understanding the root cause of challenges faced in different projects nor in improving the reliability nor in getting valid commitment of key project parties. It is also ineffective to symbolize as the metric to represent the preparedness, capacity or performance of the different sub-contractors. This paper aims to provide an in-depth review of PPC and other reliability measurements and their advantages and shortfalls for practical implementation. It reviews the symbolic representation of PPC to improvement through the application of Lean methods in construction from a planning and management perspective. From these analysis, this paper introduces a framework for practical implementation of Lean construction. It also proposes new metrics to supplement PPC to accurately represent plan reliability for better understanding of the root causes. The proposed indices are validated using data obtained from the digital application of Lean construction processes using Lean PlanDo. Lean PlanDo is digital tool embedded with Lean principles for construction planning and management based on LPS with a key emphasis on Value Stream Mapping (VSM) and constraint management. The proposed indices will provide the project teams with practical measurements and to build upon their understanding of Lean, measure the effectiveness of planning and the application of Lean methods in the project. 1 R&D Manager, Lean Station Ptd. Ltd., 73 JTC LauncPad Ayer Rajah Crescent, #02-27, Singapore, S139952, +6587483827, qui@leanstation.com 2 CEO, Co-founder, Lean Station Ptd. Ltd., 73 JTC LauncPad Ayer Rajah Crescent, #02-27, Singapore, S139952, +6597508940, sharath@leanstation.com Thi Qui Nguyen and Sharath Sridhar Waikar 1038 Proceedings IGLC-26, July 2018 | Chennai, India\",\"PeriodicalId\":419313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24928/2018/0216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"26th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24928/2018/0216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
精益建设作为提高建设项目绩效和生产率的一种手段,在许多国家被越来越多地采用。衡量实现可靠性、准备、承诺和协作文化结果的各种改进对于持续成功地实际实施精益至关重要。在众多精益技术和工具中,最后计划者系统(Last Planner System, LPS)方法以其简单、适用于施工环境而被广泛应用于建筑项目中。对于LPS,计划可靠性通过计划完成率(PPC)来衡量。人们发现,PPC作为一个单一的度量标准,在提供可操作的信息、了解不同项目面临的挑战的根本原因、提高可靠性或获得关键项目各方的有效承诺方面是不够的。用符号化作为度量来表示不同分包商的准备程度、能力或绩效也是无效的。本文旨在对PPC和其他可靠性测量方法及其优缺点进行深入的综述。从规划和管理的角度回顾了PPC的符号表示,通过精益方法在施工中的应用进行改进。在此基础上,提出了精益建设的具体实施框架。它还提出了新的指标来补充PPC,以准确地表示计划可靠性,以便更好地了解根本原因。提出的指标是通过使用精益计划从精益建设过程的数字化应用中获得的数据进行验证的。Lean PlanDo是一个数字化工具,嵌入了基于LPS的建筑规划和管理的精益原则,重点强调价值流映射(VSM)和约束管理。拟议的指标将为项目团队提供实际的衡量标准,并在他们对精益的理解的基础上,衡量计划的有效性和精益方法在项目中的应用。1精益站研发经理新加坡JTC LauncPad Ayer Rajah Crescent 73号,02-27号,S139952, +6587483827, qui@leanstation.com 2 Lean Station Ptd首席执行官,联合创始人Thi Qui Nguyen和Sharath Sridhar Waikar 1038 Proceedings IGLC-26, July 2018 |印度金奈
A Relook at Plan Reliability Measurements in Lean Construction and New Metrics From Digitized Practical Implementation
Lean construction is increasingly being adopted in many countries as a means to improve construction project performance and productivity. Measuring the various improvements towards achieving the outcomes of reliability, preparedness, commitment and collaborative culture is crucial for a sustained successful practical implementation of Lean. Among various Lean techniques and tools, the Last Planner System (LPS) method has been widely used in construction projects for its simplicity and applicability to the construction environment. With LPS, the plan reliability is measured by Percent Plan Complete (PPC). The PPC as a single metric has been found to be insufficient in providing actionable information in understanding the root cause of challenges faced in different projects nor in improving the reliability nor in getting valid commitment of key project parties. It is also ineffective to symbolize as the metric to represent the preparedness, capacity or performance of the different sub-contractors. This paper aims to provide an in-depth review of PPC and other reliability measurements and their advantages and shortfalls for practical implementation. It reviews the symbolic representation of PPC to improvement through the application of Lean methods in construction from a planning and management perspective. From these analysis, this paper introduces a framework for practical implementation of Lean construction. It also proposes new metrics to supplement PPC to accurately represent plan reliability for better understanding of the root causes. The proposed indices are validated using data obtained from the digital application of Lean construction processes using Lean PlanDo. Lean PlanDo is digital tool embedded with Lean principles for construction planning and management based on LPS with a key emphasis on Value Stream Mapping (VSM) and constraint management. The proposed indices will provide the project teams with practical measurements and to build upon their understanding of Lean, measure the effectiveness of planning and the application of Lean methods in the project. 1 R&D Manager, Lean Station Ptd. Ltd., 73 JTC LauncPad Ayer Rajah Crescent, #02-27, Singapore, S139952, +6587483827, qui@leanstation.com 2 CEO, Co-founder, Lean Station Ptd. Ltd., 73 JTC LauncPad Ayer Rajah Crescent, #02-27, Singapore, S139952, +6597508940, sharath@leanstation.com Thi Qui Nguyen and Sharath Sridhar Waikar 1038 Proceedings IGLC-26, July 2018 | Chennai, India