医学领域传统与虚拟教学方法的横断面比较研究

Jmmdc
{"title":"医学领域传统与虚拟教学方法的横断面比较研究","authors":"Jmmdc","doi":"10.58380/jmmdc.v1i1.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare conventional (physical) versus virtual Teaching in the medical field.Place of Study: Department of Anatomy, King Edward Medical University, LahoreStudy Design: A descriptive Cross Seconal Study.Duration of Study: November 2020 to February 2021Methodology: The study was conducted during the covid-19 pandemic, during which physical classes in medical colleges were suspended all over Pakistan. A sample size of 200 MBBS students was selected. A smartphone app was used to recruit students (i.e., WhatsApp). The participants were requested to take part in an anonymous online survey using Google Forms and provide their informed consent. The preferred teaching method chosen by respondents was reported with percentages, and the benefits and drawbacks of in-person and online teaching were considered. To compare the responses of different groups, the Pearson chi-square test was used.Results: Among 200 students, 84.5% preferred Conventional teaching, 08% went for virtual teaching, and 7.5% were interested in both types of teaching methodologies.Conclusion: Most of the students preferred conventional (physical) teaching to virtual learning.","PeriodicalId":286507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multan Medical & Dental College","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Cross-sectional Study Of Conventional Versus Virtual Teaching Methods In The Medical Field\",\"authors\":\"Jmmdc\",\"doi\":\"10.58380/jmmdc.v1i1.70\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To compare conventional (physical) versus virtual Teaching in the medical field.Place of Study: Department of Anatomy, King Edward Medical University, LahoreStudy Design: A descriptive Cross Seconal Study.Duration of Study: November 2020 to February 2021Methodology: The study was conducted during the covid-19 pandemic, during which physical classes in medical colleges were suspended all over Pakistan. A sample size of 200 MBBS students was selected. A smartphone app was used to recruit students (i.e., WhatsApp). The participants were requested to take part in an anonymous online survey using Google Forms and provide their informed consent. The preferred teaching method chosen by respondents was reported with percentages, and the benefits and drawbacks of in-person and online teaching were considered. To compare the responses of different groups, the Pearson chi-square test was used.Results: Among 200 students, 84.5% preferred Conventional teaching, 08% went for virtual teaching, and 7.5% were interested in both types of teaching methodologies.Conclusion: Most of the students preferred conventional (physical) teaching to virtual learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Multan Medical & Dental College\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Multan Medical & Dental College\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58380/jmmdc.v1i1.70\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multan Medical & Dental College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58380/jmmdc.v1i1.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较传统(物理)教学与虚拟教学在医学领域的应用。研究地点:拉合尔爱德华国王医科大学解剖系研究设计:描述性横断面研究。研究时间:2020年11月至2021年2月方法:本研究在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间进行,在此期间巴基斯坦各地医学院的体育课暂停。我们选取了200名MBBS学生作为样本。我们使用了一款智能手机应用来招募学生(即WhatsApp)。参与者被要求使用谷歌表格参加一项匿名在线调查,并提供他们的知情同意。受访者选择的首选教学方法以百分比报告,并考虑了面对面和在线教学的利弊。为了比较不同组的反应,使用Pearson卡方检验。结果:在200名学生中,84.5%的人喜欢传统教学,08%的人喜欢虚拟教学,7.5%的人对两种教学方法都感兴趣。结论:大多数学生更喜欢传统(物理)教学,而不是虚拟学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Cross-sectional Study Of Conventional Versus Virtual Teaching Methods In The Medical Field
Objective: To compare conventional (physical) versus virtual Teaching in the medical field.Place of Study: Department of Anatomy, King Edward Medical University, LahoreStudy Design: A descriptive Cross Seconal Study.Duration of Study: November 2020 to February 2021Methodology: The study was conducted during the covid-19 pandemic, during which physical classes in medical colleges were suspended all over Pakistan. A sample size of 200 MBBS students was selected. A smartphone app was used to recruit students (i.e., WhatsApp). The participants were requested to take part in an anonymous online survey using Google Forms and provide their informed consent. The preferred teaching method chosen by respondents was reported with percentages, and the benefits and drawbacks of in-person and online teaching were considered. To compare the responses of different groups, the Pearson chi-square test was used.Results: Among 200 students, 84.5% preferred Conventional teaching, 08% went for virtual teaching, and 7.5% were interested in both types of teaching methodologies.Conclusion: Most of the students preferred conventional (physical) teaching to virtual learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Test article post Test THE NITTY-GRITTY OF WRITING A RESEARCH ARTICLE IN MEDICAL JOURNAL The Nitty-gritty Of Writing A Research Article In Medical Journal Assessment Of Shear Bond Strength And Failure Modes Between The Base And Bulk Resin Restorative Materials; An In Vitro Comparative Study Mobilization Of First Rib Impairment Caused By Bone Thronged In Larynx (A Case Study)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1