Hathi:基于mcdm的云托管DBMS容量规划方法

Jörg Domaschka, Simon Volpert, Daniel Seybold
{"title":"Hathi:基于mcdm的云托管DBMS容量规划方法","authors":"Jörg Domaschka, Simon Volpert, Daniel Seybold","doi":"10.1109/UCC48980.2020.00033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evolution of distributed Database Management Systems (DBMSs) has led to heterogeneity in DBMS technologies. Particularly DBMSs applying a shared-nothing approach enable distributed operation and support fine-grained configurations of distribution characteristics such as replication degree and consistency. Overall, the operation of such DBMSs on IaaS clouds leads to a large configuration space involving different cloud providers, cloud resources and pricing models.The selection of a specific configuration impacts nonfunctional features such as performance, availability, consistency, but also costs of the deployment. In consequence, these need to be traded-off against each other and a suitable configuration needs to be found, satisfying technical and operational aspects. Yet, due to the strong interdependency between different non-functional features as well as the large number of DBMSs, configuration options, and cloud providers, a manual analysis and comparison is not possible.In this paper, we present Hathi, an evaluation-driven Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) framework for planning of cloud-hosted distributed DBMS. By specifying DBMS configurations, workloads, and cloud offers, Hathi automatically performs experiments and evaluates their results. These are then matched against a list of user-defined preferences using an MCDM algorithm.Our evaluation shows that Hathi is able of performing largescale evaluation scenarios involving multiple DBMS in various cluster sizes, cloud providers, and cloud offers. Hathi can weight the resulting data and derives deployment recommendations with respect to throughput, latency, cost, consistency, availability, and stability.","PeriodicalId":125849,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE/ACM 13th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hathi: An MCDM-based Approach to Capacity Planning for Cloud-hosted DBMS\",\"authors\":\"Jörg Domaschka, Simon Volpert, Daniel Seybold\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/UCC48980.2020.00033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The evolution of distributed Database Management Systems (DBMSs) has led to heterogeneity in DBMS technologies. Particularly DBMSs applying a shared-nothing approach enable distributed operation and support fine-grained configurations of distribution characteristics such as replication degree and consistency. Overall, the operation of such DBMSs on IaaS clouds leads to a large configuration space involving different cloud providers, cloud resources and pricing models.The selection of a specific configuration impacts nonfunctional features such as performance, availability, consistency, but also costs of the deployment. In consequence, these need to be traded-off against each other and a suitable configuration needs to be found, satisfying technical and operational aspects. Yet, due to the strong interdependency between different non-functional features as well as the large number of DBMSs, configuration options, and cloud providers, a manual analysis and comparison is not possible.In this paper, we present Hathi, an evaluation-driven Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) framework for planning of cloud-hosted distributed DBMS. By specifying DBMS configurations, workloads, and cloud offers, Hathi automatically performs experiments and evaluates their results. These are then matched against a list of user-defined preferences using an MCDM algorithm.Our evaluation shows that Hathi is able of performing largescale evaluation scenarios involving multiple DBMS in various cluster sizes, cloud providers, and cloud offers. Hathi can weight the resulting data and derives deployment recommendations with respect to throughput, latency, cost, consistency, availability, and stability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE/ACM 13th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE/ACM 13th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/UCC48980.2020.00033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE/ACM 13th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing (UCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UCC48980.2020.00033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

分布式数据库管理系统(DBMS)的发展导致了DBMS技术的异质性。特别是应用无共享方法的dbms支持分布式操作,并支持细粒度的分布特征配置,如复制程度和一致性。总体而言,此类dbms在IaaS云上运行会导致涉及不同云提供商、云资源和定价模型的巨大配置空间。特定配置的选择会影响非功能特性,如性能、可用性、一致性,但也会影响部署成本。因此,这些需要相互权衡,需要找到合适的配置,以满足技术和操作方面的要求。然而,由于不同的非功能性特性以及大量的dbms、配置选项和云提供商之间存在很强的相互依赖性,因此不可能进行手动分析和比较。在本文中,我们提出了Hathi,一个评估驱动的多标准决策(MCDM)框架,用于规划云托管分布式DBMS。通过指定DBMS配置、工作负载和云服务,Hathi可以自动执行实验并评估结果。然后使用MCDM算法将这些参数与用户定义的首选项列表进行匹配。我们的评估表明,Hathi能够执行大规模评估场景,涉及不同集群规模、云提供商和云服务中的多个DBMS。Hathi可以对结果数据进行加权,并根据吞吐量、延迟、成本、一致性、可用性和稳定性得出部署建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hathi: An MCDM-based Approach to Capacity Planning for Cloud-hosted DBMS
The evolution of distributed Database Management Systems (DBMSs) has led to heterogeneity in DBMS technologies. Particularly DBMSs applying a shared-nothing approach enable distributed operation and support fine-grained configurations of distribution characteristics such as replication degree and consistency. Overall, the operation of such DBMSs on IaaS clouds leads to a large configuration space involving different cloud providers, cloud resources and pricing models.The selection of a specific configuration impacts nonfunctional features such as performance, availability, consistency, but also costs of the deployment. In consequence, these need to be traded-off against each other and a suitable configuration needs to be found, satisfying technical and operational aspects. Yet, due to the strong interdependency between different non-functional features as well as the large number of DBMSs, configuration options, and cloud providers, a manual analysis and comparison is not possible.In this paper, we present Hathi, an evaluation-driven Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) framework for planning of cloud-hosted distributed DBMS. By specifying DBMS configurations, workloads, and cloud offers, Hathi automatically performs experiments and evaluates their results. These are then matched against a list of user-defined preferences using an MCDM algorithm.Our evaluation shows that Hathi is able of performing largescale evaluation scenarios involving multiple DBMS in various cluster sizes, cloud providers, and cloud offers. Hathi can weight the resulting data and derives deployment recommendations with respect to throughput, latency, cost, consistency, availability, and stability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Blockchain Mobility Solution for Charging Transactions of Electrical Vehicles Open-source Serverless Architectures: an Evaluation of Apache OpenWhisk Explaining probabilistic Artificial Intelligence (AI) models by discretizing Deep Neural Networks Message from the B2D2LM 2020 Workshop Chairs Dynamic Network Slicing in Fog Computing for Mobile Users in MobFogSim
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1