写作改进的直接与间接纠正反馈:学生的偏好

Khilda Husnia Abidah, Elisa Ratih
{"title":"写作改进的直接与间接纠正反馈:学生的偏好","authors":"Khilda Husnia Abidah, Elisa Ratih","doi":"10.31943/wej.v6i1.151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research presents the students’ preference for feedback in deciding what specific feedback will be valuable and positively affect the students’ writing performance. There might be a mismatch between students’ preferences and lecturer’s practice from a few past studies. A quantitative research design was utilized in this study. It was conducted in Muhammadiyah Malang University with 70 English Language Education Department students as the participants. A data set of 10 questions in the survey for students was adjusted from Aridah et al. (2017). Further, the data were scored using the “Feedback Scale” with a scale ranging from 0 to 1. The finding showed that the feedback preference of the students is direct corrective feedback, in which the mean score was higher (M=6.53) than indirect corrective feedback. The students believed that direct corrective feedback gave more additional clearness. Therefore, this study recommended that the lecturer give feedback based on the students’ preference which is direct corrective feedback to improve their writing skills easily and effectively.","PeriodicalId":248828,"journal":{"name":"Wiralodra English Journal","volume":"101 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DIRECT VS INDIRECT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR WRITING IMPROVEMENT: STUDENTS’ PREFERENCES\",\"authors\":\"Khilda Husnia Abidah, Elisa Ratih\",\"doi\":\"10.31943/wej.v6i1.151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research presents the students’ preference for feedback in deciding what specific feedback will be valuable and positively affect the students’ writing performance. There might be a mismatch between students’ preferences and lecturer’s practice from a few past studies. A quantitative research design was utilized in this study. It was conducted in Muhammadiyah Malang University with 70 English Language Education Department students as the participants. A data set of 10 questions in the survey for students was adjusted from Aridah et al. (2017). Further, the data were scored using the “Feedback Scale” with a scale ranging from 0 to 1. The finding showed that the feedback preference of the students is direct corrective feedback, in which the mean score was higher (M=6.53) than indirect corrective feedback. The students believed that direct corrective feedback gave more additional clearness. Therefore, this study recommended that the lecturer give feedback based on the students’ preference which is direct corrective feedback to improve their writing skills easily and effectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":248828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiralodra English Journal\",\"volume\":\"101 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiralodra English Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31943/wej.v6i1.151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiralodra English Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31943/wej.v6i1.151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究发现,在决定哪些具体的反馈是有价值的,并对学生的写作表现产生积极影响时,学生对反馈的偏好。从过去的一些研究来看,学生的偏好和讲师的实践可能不匹配。本研究采用定量研究设计。这是在穆罕默德玛琅大学进行的,有70名英语语言教育系的学生作为参与者。学生调查中的10个问题的数据集调整自Aridah等人(2017)。此外,使用“反馈量表”对数据进行评分,评分范围从0到1。研究发现,学生的反馈偏好为直接纠正性反馈,其平均得分(M=6.53)高于间接纠正性反馈。学生们认为,直接的纠正反馈能让他们更加清晰。因此,本研究建议讲师根据学生的偏好进行反馈,这是一种直接的纠正性反馈,可以轻松有效地提高学生的写作技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DIRECT VS INDIRECT CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOR WRITING IMPROVEMENT: STUDENTS’ PREFERENCES
This research presents the students’ preference for feedback in deciding what specific feedback will be valuable and positively affect the students’ writing performance. There might be a mismatch between students’ preferences and lecturer’s practice from a few past studies. A quantitative research design was utilized in this study. It was conducted in Muhammadiyah Malang University with 70 English Language Education Department students as the participants. A data set of 10 questions in the survey for students was adjusted from Aridah et al. (2017). Further, the data were scored using the “Feedback Scale” with a scale ranging from 0 to 1. The finding showed that the feedback preference of the students is direct corrective feedback, in which the mean score was higher (M=6.53) than indirect corrective feedback. The students believed that direct corrective feedback gave more additional clearness. Therefore, this study recommended that the lecturer give feedback based on the students’ preference which is direct corrective feedback to improve their writing skills easily and effectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EFFECT OF GRAMMAR LEARNING STRATEGIES (GLS) IN LANGUAGE LEARNING: CASE STUDY ON VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN DETERMINING PROFICIENCY LEVELS INCORPORATING LESSON PLAN IN DEVELOPING AN ITINERARY FOR A TOUR PACKAGE TO PROMOTE LOCAL CULTURE: A CASE STUDY IN KAMPOENG WISATA CINANGNENG, BOGOR REGENCY DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF MISS UNIVERSE 2018—2023’s WINNING ANSWERS INFLUENCE OF VOCABULARY MASTERY AND READING STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ READING ABILITY DIGITAL LITERACY WITH EFL STUDENTS: DISCOVERING BANTEN’S STUDENTS' PERCEPTION ABOUT INTEGRATING DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN COLLABORATIVE LEARNING
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1