面向新手程序员的基于块的编程与基于流的编程

D. Mason, Kruti Dave
{"title":"面向新手程序员的基于块的编程与基于流的编程","authors":"D. Mason, Kruti Dave","doi":"10.1109/BLOCKS.2017.8120405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is wide consensus that most people should have some programming capability, whether to control the Internet of Things, or to analyse the world of data around them. While some people focus on teaching conventional text-based languages like Javascript or Python, there is evidence that visual programming languages are more accessible for naive programmers. Visual programming languages fall into two broad categories: block-based, imperative programming, or flow-based, functional programming. However there have not been empirical studies to evaluate the relative merits of the two categories. This paper describes a study of hundreds of random people via Amazon Mechanical Turk attempting to program some simple problems in one or the other of two environments designed to be as similar as possible, except for the choice of paradigm.","PeriodicalId":424744,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Blocks and Beyond Workshop (B&B)","volume":"18 Suppl 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Block-based versus flow-based programming for naive programmers\",\"authors\":\"D. Mason, Kruti Dave\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BLOCKS.2017.8120405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is wide consensus that most people should have some programming capability, whether to control the Internet of Things, or to analyse the world of data around them. While some people focus on teaching conventional text-based languages like Javascript or Python, there is evidence that visual programming languages are more accessible for naive programmers. Visual programming languages fall into two broad categories: block-based, imperative programming, or flow-based, functional programming. However there have not been empirical studies to evaluate the relative merits of the two categories. This paper describes a study of hundreds of random people via Amazon Mechanical Turk attempting to program some simple problems in one or the other of two environments designed to be as similar as possible, except for the choice of paradigm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":424744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE Blocks and Beyond Workshop (B&B)\",\"volume\":\"18 Suppl 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE Blocks and Beyond Workshop (B&B)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BLOCKS.2017.8120405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Blocks and Beyond Workshop (B&B)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BLOCKS.2017.8120405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

人们普遍认为,无论是控制物联网,还是分析周围的数据世界,大多数人都应该具备一定的编程能力。虽然有些人专注于教授传统的基于文本的语言,如Javascript或Python,但有证据表明,对于新手程序员来说,可视化编程语言更容易上手。可视化编程语言分为两大类:基于块的命令式编程,或基于流的函数式编程。然而,目前还没有实证研究来评估这两种类别的相对优劣。本文描述了一项通过Amazon Mechanical Turk对数百名随机人员进行的研究,该研究试图在两种设计得尽可能相似的环境中的一种或另一种环境中编程一些简单的问题,只是范式的选择不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Block-based versus flow-based programming for naive programmers
There is wide consensus that most people should have some programming capability, whether to control the Internet of Things, or to analyse the world of data around them. While some people focus on teaching conventional text-based languages like Javascript or Python, there is evidence that visual programming languages are more accessible for naive programmers. Visual programming languages fall into two broad categories: block-based, imperative programming, or flow-based, functional programming. However there have not been empirical studies to evaluate the relative merits of the two categories. This paper describes a study of hundreds of random people via Amazon Mechanical Turk attempting to program some simple problems in one or the other of two environments designed to be as similar as possible, except for the choice of paradigm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Overcoming mental blocks: A blocks-based approach to experience sampling studies Extending the design of a blocks-based python environment to support complex types Helping teachers and students learn to use 3D in agentcubes online Using feature vector representations to identify similar projects in app inventor Let's work together: Improving block-based environments by supporting synchronous collaboration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1