未经允许在社交媒体上查看某项产品的犯罪行为

Bagus Andika Artha Surya, A. A. S. Laksmi Dewi, L. Suryani
{"title":"未经允许在社交媒体上查看某项产品的犯罪行为","authors":"Bagus Andika Artha Surya, A. A. S. Laksmi Dewi, L. Suryani","doi":"10.22225/juinhum.2.3.4138.567-572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the competitive world of business, one effective way as a means of promotion is reviewing or reviewing products, which are activities carried out by consumers to give their impressions and views about a product so that it becomes a consideration for other consumers before buying the product, but there are negative impacts from this activity, namely if it is misused by irresponsible persons, what happens is that the person gives a bad image to business actors because of these activities and affects consumers who will buy the product. The purpose of this study is to analyze the sanctions that can be imposed from reviewing or reviewing a product that has copyright without permission from business actors. This study applies a normative method with a statutory approach. Data collection techniques were carried out by examining existing library materials. The sources of law used are divided into two, namely primary and secondary sources of law which are then analyzed by methods of legal interpretation, legal argumentation, and legal construction. The results of the study reveal that the activity of reviewing a product is also regulated through Article 27 paragraph (3) of Law 19 of 2016 concerning amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning information and electronic transactions aimed at protecting brands from good name numbers.","PeriodicalId":197649,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sanksi Pidana Bagi Kegiatan Mereview Suatu Produk Usaha di Media Sosial Tanpa Izin\",\"authors\":\"Bagus Andika Artha Surya, A. A. S. Laksmi Dewi, L. Suryani\",\"doi\":\"10.22225/juinhum.2.3.4138.567-572\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the competitive world of business, one effective way as a means of promotion is reviewing or reviewing products, which are activities carried out by consumers to give their impressions and views about a product so that it becomes a consideration for other consumers before buying the product, but there are negative impacts from this activity, namely if it is misused by irresponsible persons, what happens is that the person gives a bad image to business actors because of these activities and affects consumers who will buy the product. The purpose of this study is to analyze the sanctions that can be imposed from reviewing or reviewing a product that has copyright without permission from business actors. This study applies a normative method with a statutory approach. Data collection techniques were carried out by examining existing library materials. The sources of law used are divided into two, namely primary and secondary sources of law which are then analyzed by methods of legal interpretation, legal argumentation, and legal construction. The results of the study reveal that the activity of reviewing a product is also regulated through Article 27 paragraph (3) of Law 19 of 2016 concerning amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning information and electronic transactions aimed at protecting brands from good name numbers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.2.3.4138.567-572\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.2.3.4138.567-572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在竞争激烈的商业世界中,作为一种促销手段的一种有效方法是审查或评论产品,这是消费者对产品进行的活动,以给出他们对产品的印象和看法,以便在购买产品之前成为其他消费者的考虑因素,但是这种活动也有负面影响,即如果它被不负责任的人滥用,所发生的是,由于这些活动,这个人给商业行为者留下了不好的形象,并影响了购买该产品的消费者。本研究的目的是分析在未经商业行为者许可的情况下审查或审查具有版权的产品可能会受到的制裁。本研究采用规范性方法和法定方法。数据收集技术是通过审查现有的图书馆资料来进行的。所使用的法律渊源分为两个,即主要的法律渊源和次要的法律渊源,然后通过法律解释、法律论证和法律建构的方法来分析。研究结果表明,审查产品的活动也受到2016年第19号法律第27条第(3)款的监管,该条款涉及2008年第11号法律的修正案,该法律涉及信息和电子交易,旨在保护品牌免受好名字的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sanksi Pidana Bagi Kegiatan Mereview Suatu Produk Usaha di Media Sosial Tanpa Izin
In the competitive world of business, one effective way as a means of promotion is reviewing or reviewing products, which are activities carried out by consumers to give their impressions and views about a product so that it becomes a consideration for other consumers before buying the product, but there are negative impacts from this activity, namely if it is misused by irresponsible persons, what happens is that the person gives a bad image to business actors because of these activities and affects consumers who will buy the product. The purpose of this study is to analyze the sanctions that can be imposed from reviewing or reviewing a product that has copyright without permission from business actors. This study applies a normative method with a statutory approach. Data collection techniques were carried out by examining existing library materials. The sources of law used are divided into two, namely primary and secondary sources of law which are then analyzed by methods of legal interpretation, legal argumentation, and legal construction. The results of the study reveal that the activity of reviewing a product is also regulated through Article 27 paragraph (3) of Law 19 of 2016 concerning amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning information and electronic transactions aimed at protecting brands from good name numbers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Upaya Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Kreditur atas Debitur Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Kredit pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Peran Polisi Kehutanan dalam Perlindungan Satwa Liar (Studi Kasus di Balai Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Bali) Pengelolaan Sampah dalam Upaya Pengendalian Pencemaran Lingkungan oleh Desa Adat Padangtegal, Kecamatan Ubud, Kabupaten Gianyar Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Ketentuan Me-Review Produk dimedia Sosial Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Konsumen Akibat Cacat Produk pada Saat Produksi Ditinjau dari Undang – Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1