肺移植中供肺取样的可靠性

B. T. Chao, A. Sage, M. Cypel, Mingyao Liu, J. Yeung, X. Bai, D. Van raemdonck, L. Ceulemans, A. Neyrinck, S. Verleden, S. Keshavjee
{"title":"肺移植中供肺取样的可靠性","authors":"B. T. Chao, A. Sage, M. Cypel, Mingyao Liu, J. Yeung, X. Bai, D. Van raemdonck, L. Ceulemans, A. Neyrinck, S. Verleden, S. Keshavjee","doi":"10.33137/utjph.v2i2.36828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a normothermic platform used to assess donor lungs. Many have studied biomarkers in lung injury, but it is unclear whether samples taken from one location are representative of the organ. Our objective was to investigate the uniformity of cytokine expression in tissue biopsies and in EVLP perfusates from various locations. \nMethods: In the tissue study, eight donor lungs were partitioned from apex to base. In each lung, three biopsies were taken from the third, sixth, and ninth slices, while two were taken from the lingula and an injury site. In the perfusate study, four samples were taken from four lobes in eight donors during EVLP. Expressions of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-1β were measured using qPCR and ELISA. \nResults: In the tissue study, the mean intra-biopsy equal-variance F-value was 0.53. The median intra-biopsy coefficient of variation (CV) was 18%. In donors without gross focal injury, the mean comparisons of biopsies in each donor showed that the three consistent slices showed no differences and had a CV of 20%, which was similar to the intra-biopsy CV (p=0.80). Both the lingula and injury biopsies demonstrated larger differences from the rest. The median intra-lung CV of perfusates from different lobes was 4.9%. \nConclusion: Intra-biopsy variances were consistent across biopsies. Lungs without gross focal injury demonstrated more consistent gene expression. The lingula is not a representative site due to high signal variability. The consistent measurements in EVLP perfusates provided a uniform picture of the inflammation.","PeriodicalId":265882,"journal":{"name":"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of Donor Lung Sampling in Lung Transplantation\",\"authors\":\"B. T. Chao, A. Sage, M. Cypel, Mingyao Liu, J. Yeung, X. Bai, D. Van raemdonck, L. Ceulemans, A. Neyrinck, S. Verleden, S. Keshavjee\",\"doi\":\"10.33137/utjph.v2i2.36828\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a normothermic platform used to assess donor lungs. Many have studied biomarkers in lung injury, but it is unclear whether samples taken from one location are representative of the organ. Our objective was to investigate the uniformity of cytokine expression in tissue biopsies and in EVLP perfusates from various locations. \\nMethods: In the tissue study, eight donor lungs were partitioned from apex to base. In each lung, three biopsies were taken from the third, sixth, and ninth slices, while two were taken from the lingula and an injury site. In the perfusate study, four samples were taken from four lobes in eight donors during EVLP. Expressions of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-1β were measured using qPCR and ELISA. \\nResults: In the tissue study, the mean intra-biopsy equal-variance F-value was 0.53. The median intra-biopsy coefficient of variation (CV) was 18%. In donors without gross focal injury, the mean comparisons of biopsies in each donor showed that the three consistent slices showed no differences and had a CV of 20%, which was similar to the intra-biopsy CV (p=0.80). Both the lingula and injury biopsies demonstrated larger differences from the rest. The median intra-lung CV of perfusates from different lobes was 4.9%. \\nConclusion: Intra-biopsy variances were consistent across biopsies. Lungs without gross focal injury demonstrated more consistent gene expression. The lingula is not a representative site due to high signal variability. The consistent measurements in EVLP perfusates provided a uniform picture of the inflammation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33137/utjph.v2i2.36828\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Toronto Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33137/utjph.v2i2.36828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

体外肺灌注(EVLP)是一种用于评估供体肺的常温平台。许多人研究了肺损伤的生物标志物,但尚不清楚从一个地方采集的样本是否代表该器官。我们的目的是研究组织活检和不同部位EVLP灌注物中细胞因子表达的均匀性。方法:在组织研究中,8个供肺由尖向底分割。在每个肺中,分别从第三、第六和第九片取3个活检组织,同时从舌部和损伤部位取2个活检组织。在灌注研究中,在EVLP期间从8名供者的4个肺叶中采集了4个样本。采用qPCR和ELISA检测IL-6、IL-8、IL-10和IL-1β的表达。结果:在组织研究中,平均活检内等方差f值为0.53。活检内变异系数(CV)中位数为18%。在没有明显局灶性损伤的供者中,每个供者活检的平均比较显示,三个一致切片没有差异,CV为20%,与活检内CV相似(p=0.80)。舌部和损伤活检显示与其他部位有较大差异。不同肺叶灌注液的中位肺内CV为4.9%。结论:活检内的差异在活检中是一致的。没有明显局灶性损伤的肺表现出更一致的基因表达。由于高信号变异性,舌部并不是一个具有代表性的部位。EVLP灌注液的一致测量提供了炎症的统一图像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability of Donor Lung Sampling in Lung Transplantation
Introduction: Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) is a normothermic platform used to assess donor lungs. Many have studied biomarkers in lung injury, but it is unclear whether samples taken from one location are representative of the organ. Our objective was to investigate the uniformity of cytokine expression in tissue biopsies and in EVLP perfusates from various locations. Methods: In the tissue study, eight donor lungs were partitioned from apex to base. In each lung, three biopsies were taken from the third, sixth, and ninth slices, while two were taken from the lingula and an injury site. In the perfusate study, four samples were taken from four lobes in eight donors during EVLP. Expressions of IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and IL-1β were measured using qPCR and ELISA. Results: In the tissue study, the mean intra-biopsy equal-variance F-value was 0.53. The median intra-biopsy coefficient of variation (CV) was 18%. In donors without gross focal injury, the mean comparisons of biopsies in each donor showed that the three consistent slices showed no differences and had a CV of 20%, which was similar to the intra-biopsy CV (p=0.80). Both the lingula and injury biopsies demonstrated larger differences from the rest. The median intra-lung CV of perfusates from different lobes was 4.9%. Conclusion: Intra-biopsy variances were consistent across biopsies. Lungs without gross focal injury demonstrated more consistent gene expression. The lingula is not a representative site due to high signal variability. The consistent measurements in EVLP perfusates provided a uniform picture of the inflammation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effect of School-Based Physical Activity Interventions on Body Mass Index Among ‎Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Randomised Trials Enhancing the care experiences of Black women along the breast cancer journey: Meaningfully engaging breast cancer survivors to co-create a targeted, culturally relevant resource hub Impact of Medical Legal Partnerships: A Scoping Review Exploring Experiences with Social Inclusion, Food Security and Housing Among People Living with HIV: A Qualitative Analysis Rethinking public health pedagogy: lessons learned and pertinent questions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1