收集,可视化和解释学习设计分析,为课堂实践和课程设计提供信息

Tom Olney, B. Rienties, Lisette Toetenel
{"title":"收集,可视化和解释学习设计分析,为课堂实践和课程设计提供信息","authors":"Tom Olney, B. Rienties, Lisette Toetenel","doi":"10.4324/9781351113038-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building on an emerging body of literature on the use of learning analytics by educators, this chapter will explore the Open University (OU) approach to learning design that is currently being implemented on a large-scale. We aim to explain how this approach can be used to generate, visualise and interpret learning analytics that can be used by the educator to create learning design visualisations and data sets. Through comparison and analysis these can inform future design decisions. The basis for this OU approach can be found in the work of Conole (2012), whereby collaborative design teams use the Activity Type Classification Taxonomy to answer questions such as: What will students do in this module? How much will they be reading? What practical activities will they do? And, what does a ‘good’ learning design profile look like? The use of this taxonomy helps to establish a common language with which teachers can compare their teaching and learning practice with other teachers, schools and cluster groups. Where teachers are teaching from the same curriculum this data set, when visualised and analysed, can provide insight into the student learning experience. The approach allows for the measuring of what the student is doing, giving a different and unique view from those that only measure students by their academic ability. At the end of each section there is a short discussion entitled In the Classroom which suggests ways teachers in a classroom setting could adapt the approach for their circumstances.","PeriodicalId":265338,"journal":{"name":"Learning Analytics in the Classroom","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gathering, visualising and interpreting learning design analytics to inform classroom practice and curriculum design\",\"authors\":\"Tom Olney, B. Rienties, Lisette Toetenel\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781351113038-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Building on an emerging body of literature on the use of learning analytics by educators, this chapter will explore the Open University (OU) approach to learning design that is currently being implemented on a large-scale. We aim to explain how this approach can be used to generate, visualise and interpret learning analytics that can be used by the educator to create learning design visualisations and data sets. Through comparison and analysis these can inform future design decisions. The basis for this OU approach can be found in the work of Conole (2012), whereby collaborative design teams use the Activity Type Classification Taxonomy to answer questions such as: What will students do in this module? How much will they be reading? What practical activities will they do? And, what does a ‘good’ learning design profile look like? The use of this taxonomy helps to establish a common language with which teachers can compare their teaching and learning practice with other teachers, schools and cluster groups. Where teachers are teaching from the same curriculum this data set, when visualised and analysed, can provide insight into the student learning experience. The approach allows for the measuring of what the student is doing, giving a different and unique view from those that only measure students by their academic ability. At the end of each section there is a short discussion entitled In the Classroom which suggests ways teachers in a classroom setting could adapt the approach for their circumstances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":265338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Analytics in the Classroom\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Analytics in the Classroom\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351113038-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Analytics in the Classroom","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351113038-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

基于教育工作者使用学习分析的新兴文献,本章将探讨目前正在大规模实施的开放大学(OU)学习设计方法。我们的目标是解释如何使用这种方法来生成、可视化和解释学习分析,教育工作者可以使用这些分析来创建学习设计可视化和数据集。通过比较和分析,这些可以为未来的设计决策提供信息。这种OU方法的基础可以在Conole(2012)的工作中找到,协作设计团队使用活动类型分类分类法来回答诸如:学生将在这个模块中做什么?他们会读多少书?他们将进行哪些实践活动?一个“好的”学习设计应该是什么样的?使用这种分类法有助于建立一种共同的语言,教师可以用这种语言与其他教师、学校和小组进行教学和学习实践的比较。当教师在同一课程中授课时,这些数据集在可视化和分析后,可以深入了解学生的学习体验。这种方法可以衡量学生正在做什么,与那些只根据学术能力衡量学生的方法不同,提供了一个独特的视角。在每个部分的最后都有一个题为“在课堂上”的简短讨论,该讨论建议教师在课堂上如何根据自己的情况调整教学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gathering, visualising and interpreting learning design analytics to inform classroom practice and curriculum design
Building on an emerging body of literature on the use of learning analytics by educators, this chapter will explore the Open University (OU) approach to learning design that is currently being implemented on a large-scale. We aim to explain how this approach can be used to generate, visualise and interpret learning analytics that can be used by the educator to create learning design visualisations and data sets. Through comparison and analysis these can inform future design decisions. The basis for this OU approach can be found in the work of Conole (2012), whereby collaborative design teams use the Activity Type Classification Taxonomy to answer questions such as: What will students do in this module? How much will they be reading? What practical activities will they do? And, what does a ‘good’ learning design profile look like? The use of this taxonomy helps to establish a common language with which teachers can compare their teaching and learning practice with other teachers, schools and cluster groups. Where teachers are teaching from the same curriculum this data set, when visualised and analysed, can provide insight into the student learning experience. The approach allows for the measuring of what the student is doing, giving a different and unique view from those that only measure students by their academic ability. At the end of each section there is a short discussion entitled In the Classroom which suggests ways teachers in a classroom setting could adapt the approach for their circumstances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using measures of pedagogical quality to provide feedback and improve practice Identifying epistemic emotions from activity analytics in interactive digital learning environments Opening the black box Supporting the use of student-facing learning analytics in the classroom The perspective realism brings to learning analytics in the classroom
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1