学生对与智能辅导相结合的智能mooc学习的偏好和看法

G. K. Yılmaz, Mustafa Tepgeç, Cennet Terzi Müftüoglu, Sema Sulak, Muhittin Şahin, Furkan Aydın, Ramazan Yılmaz, Halil Yurdugül
{"title":"学生对与智能辅导相结合的智能mooc学习的偏好和看法","authors":"G. K. Yılmaz, Mustafa Tepgeç, Cennet Terzi Müftüoglu, Sema Sulak, Muhittin Şahin, Furkan Aydın, Ramazan Yılmaz, Halil Yurdugül","doi":"10.33965/celda2021_202108l013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have become widespread all around the world since their conceptualization, both in terms of the number of students enrolled and the number of courses available. Some issues or learner needs in these environments, such as accreditation, quality of assessment and scaffolding for left-behind learners, have also surfaced as a result of rise in popularity. Profiling learners, using scaffolding strategies, structuring the assessment in a dynamic and effective manner, monitoring performance, and providing feedback/feedforward based on learning analytics are all expected to be valuable solutions to these issues. In this study, it is aimed to describe student views on the MOOC platform, which has the above-mentioned features and was designed and developed according to the AGILE software development model. Participants of this case study consist of 53 undergraduate students from three different universities. The data was collected using a questionnaire and semi-structured form both of which were developed by the researchers. The findings obtained were considered under these themes: benefits, disliked aspects, preferences in different learning contexts, ease of use, features open to improvement. Findings based on both quantitative and qualitative interpretations are presented on each theme. The findings of this study are limited to student views. In the later stages, authentic usage circumstances can be presented by taking into log data as a data source.","PeriodicalId":413698,"journal":{"name":"18th International Conference Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age 2021","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STUDENTS' PREFERENCES AND VIEWSABOUT LEARNING IN A SMART MOOC INTEGRATEDWITH INTELLIGENT TUTORING\",\"authors\":\"G. K. Yılmaz, Mustafa Tepgeç, Cennet Terzi Müftüoglu, Sema Sulak, Muhittin Şahin, Furkan Aydın, Ramazan Yılmaz, Halil Yurdugül\",\"doi\":\"10.33965/celda2021_202108l013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have become widespread all around the world since their conceptualization, both in terms of the number of students enrolled and the number of courses available. Some issues or learner needs in these environments, such as accreditation, quality of assessment and scaffolding for left-behind learners, have also surfaced as a result of rise in popularity. Profiling learners, using scaffolding strategies, structuring the assessment in a dynamic and effective manner, monitoring performance, and providing feedback/feedforward based on learning analytics are all expected to be valuable solutions to these issues. In this study, it is aimed to describe student views on the MOOC platform, which has the above-mentioned features and was designed and developed according to the AGILE software development model. Participants of this case study consist of 53 undergraduate students from three different universities. The data was collected using a questionnaire and semi-structured form both of which were developed by the researchers. The findings obtained were considered under these themes: benefits, disliked aspects, preferences in different learning contexts, ease of use, features open to improvement. Findings based on both quantitative and qualitative interpretations are presented on each theme. The findings of this study are limited to student views. In the later stages, authentic usage circumstances can be presented by taking into log data as a data source.\",\"PeriodicalId\":413698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"18th International Conference Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age 2021\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"18th International Conference Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33965/celda2021_202108l013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"18th International Conference Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33965/celda2021_202108l013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大规模在线开放课程(MOOCs)自其概念出现以来,无论是注册学生的数量还是可提供的课程数量,都在全球范围内得到了广泛应用。在这些环境中,一些问题或学习者的需求,如认证、评估质量和对留守学习者的支持,也随着受欢迎程度的上升而浮出水面。分析学习者,使用脚手架策略,以动态和有效的方式构建评估,监控性能,以及基于学习分析提供反馈/前馈,这些都有望成为这些问题的有价值的解决方案。本研究旨在描述学生对MOOC平台的看法,该平台具有上述特点,并根据AGILE软件开发模型进行设计和开发。本案例研究的参与者包括来自三所不同大学的53名本科生。数据是通过调查问卷和半结构化表格收集的,这两种表格都是由研究人员开发的。所获得的结果是在以下主题下考虑的:好处,不喜欢的方面,在不同的学习环境中的偏好,易用性,需要改进的功能。每个主题都提出了基于定量和定性解释的调查结果。这项研究的结果仅限于学生的观点。在后期阶段,可以通过将日志数据作为数据源来呈现真实的使用情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
STUDENTS' PREFERENCES AND VIEWSABOUT LEARNING IN A SMART MOOC INTEGRATEDWITH INTELLIGENT TUTORING
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have become widespread all around the world since their conceptualization, both in terms of the number of students enrolled and the number of courses available. Some issues or learner needs in these environments, such as accreditation, quality of assessment and scaffolding for left-behind learners, have also surfaced as a result of rise in popularity. Profiling learners, using scaffolding strategies, structuring the assessment in a dynamic and effective manner, monitoring performance, and providing feedback/feedforward based on learning analytics are all expected to be valuable solutions to these issues. In this study, it is aimed to describe student views on the MOOC platform, which has the above-mentioned features and was designed and developed according to the AGILE software development model. Participants of this case study consist of 53 undergraduate students from three different universities. The data was collected using a questionnaire and semi-structured form both of which were developed by the researchers. The findings obtained were considered under these themes: benefits, disliked aspects, preferences in different learning contexts, ease of use, features open to improvement. Findings based on both quantitative and qualitative interpretations are presented on each theme. The findings of this study are limited to student views. In the later stages, authentic usage circumstances can be presented by taking into log data as a data source.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SCHOOL EDUCATION IN A VIRTUAL SPACE: BETWEEN DAMAGE CONTROL, SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION PROMOTING SELF-REGULATED LEARNING STRATEGIES FOR FIRST-YEAR STUDENTS THROUGH THE COMPER SERVICE CAN A LEARNING ANALYTICS DASHBOARD PARTICIPATIVE DESIGN APPROACH BE TRANSPOSED TO AN ONLINE-ONLY CONTEXT? LEARNING ANALYTICS AND ITS DATA SOURCES: WHY WE NEED TO FOSTER ALL OF THEM EXPLORING STUDENTS' COMPUTATIONAL THINKING FOR MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM-SOLVING: A CASE STUDY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1