是什么让辟谣在社交媒体上走红?

Anjan Pal, Snehasish Banerjee, Avneet Kaur
{"title":"是什么让辟谣在社交媒体上走红?","authors":"Anjan Pal, Snehasish Banerjee, Avneet Kaur","doi":"10.1109/IMCOM56909.2023.10035545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the relationship between the characteristics of online rumor rebuttals and their virality on social media. Virality was conceptualized in terms of the volume of Likes (affective evaluation), Comments (message deliberation), and Shares (viral reach) attracted by rumor rebuttals on Facebook. The dataset included 479 online rumor rebuttal posts. Qualitative content analysis was employed to identify characteristics of the rebuttals while quantitative methods were used to examine how these characteristics predicted their virality. Rebuttal virality was found to be positively predicted by message posters' credibility (#Likes, #Comments, and #Shares), justification of the rebuttal (#Likes and #Comments), call to action (#Comments and #Shares), and the presence of images (#Comments). In contrast, rebuttal virality was negatively predicted by the presence of debunking statements (#Comments) and URLs (#Likes, #Comments).","PeriodicalId":230213,"journal":{"name":"2023 17th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Makes Rumor Rebuttals Viral on Social Media?\",\"authors\":\"Anjan Pal, Snehasish Banerjee, Avneet Kaur\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IMCOM56909.2023.10035545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates the relationship between the characteristics of online rumor rebuttals and their virality on social media. Virality was conceptualized in terms of the volume of Likes (affective evaluation), Comments (message deliberation), and Shares (viral reach) attracted by rumor rebuttals on Facebook. The dataset included 479 online rumor rebuttal posts. Qualitative content analysis was employed to identify characteristics of the rebuttals while quantitative methods were used to examine how these characteristics predicted their virality. Rebuttal virality was found to be positively predicted by message posters' credibility (#Likes, #Comments, and #Shares), justification of the rebuttal (#Likes and #Comments), call to action (#Comments and #Shares), and the presence of images (#Comments). In contrast, rebuttal virality was negatively predicted by the presence of debunking statements (#Comments) and URLs (#Likes, #Comments).\",\"PeriodicalId\":230213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2023 17th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM)\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2023 17th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM56909.2023.10035545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 17th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM56909.2023.10035545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了网络谣言反驳的特征与其在社交媒体上的病毒性之间的关系。病毒式传播是根据Facebook上的谣言反驳所吸引的“喜欢”(情感评价)、“评论”(信息审议)和“分享”(病毒式传播)的数量来定义的。该数据集包括479个在线谣言反驳帖子。定性内容分析用于确定反驳的特征,而定量方法用于检查这些特征如何预测其病毒性。研究发现,反驳病毒式传播与发帖者的可信度(#Likes、#Comments和#Shares)、反驳的正当性(#Likes和#Comments)、行动呼吁(#Comments和#Shares)以及图片的出现(#Comments)呈正相关。相反,反驳式病毒式传播被揭穿声明(#评论)和url(#喜欢,#评论)的存在所负面预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Makes Rumor Rebuttals Viral on Social Media?
This paper investigates the relationship between the characteristics of online rumor rebuttals and their virality on social media. Virality was conceptualized in terms of the volume of Likes (affective evaluation), Comments (message deliberation), and Shares (viral reach) attracted by rumor rebuttals on Facebook. The dataset included 479 online rumor rebuttal posts. Qualitative content analysis was employed to identify characteristics of the rebuttals while quantitative methods were used to examine how these characteristics predicted their virality. Rebuttal virality was found to be positively predicted by message posters' credibility (#Likes, #Comments, and #Shares), justification of the rebuttal (#Likes and #Comments), call to action (#Comments and #Shares), and the presence of images (#Comments). In contrast, rebuttal virality was negatively predicted by the presence of debunking statements (#Comments) and URLs (#Likes, #Comments).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lightweight energy-efficient offloading framework for mobile edge/cloud computing Dual ResNet-based Environmental Sound Classification using GAN Finite Element Method for System-in-Package (SiP) Technology: Thermal Analysis Using Chip Cooling Laminate Chip (CCLC) An Improved Reverse Distillation Model for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Pictorial Map Generation based on Color Extraction and Sentiment Analysis using SNS Photos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1