诉诸司法

Paulo Márcio Cruz, Bruno M Salles
{"title":"诉诸司法","authors":"Paulo Márcio Cruz, Bruno M Salles","doi":"10.5752/p.2318-7999.2020v23n45p177-192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What should be understood, contemporaneously, by Access to Justice? This paper addresses the challenge of answering this question by describing the main elements that portray the stage of development of the theme in Legal Science. With no pretension to exhaust the subject, considering its scope and complexity, we seek to situate Access to Justice in the contemporary scene and present the approaches commonly attributed to it, providing the methodological and terminological clarifications necessary for a proper understanding. In this context, considerations are made about perspectives classified as legal-procedural and democratic-institutional, as well as the conceptions, included in the universe of Access to Justice (lato sensu), Access to the Judiciary and Access to Rights.","PeriodicalId":148867,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ACCESS TO JUSTICE\",\"authors\":\"Paulo Márcio Cruz, Bruno M Salles\",\"doi\":\"10.5752/p.2318-7999.2020v23n45p177-192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What should be understood, contemporaneously, by Access to Justice? This paper addresses the challenge of answering this question by describing the main elements that portray the stage of development of the theme in Legal Science. With no pretension to exhaust the subject, considering its scope and complexity, we seek to situate Access to Justice in the contemporary scene and present the approaches commonly attributed to it, providing the methodological and terminological clarifications necessary for a proper understanding. In this context, considerations are made about perspectives classified as legal-procedural and democratic-institutional, as well as the conceptions, included in the universe of Access to Justice (lato sensu), Access to the Judiciary and Access to Rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5752/p.2318-7999.2020v23n45p177-192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Faculdade Mineira de Direito","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5752/p.2318-7999.2020v23n45p177-192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

与此同时,《诉诸司法》应该理解什么?本文通过描述描绘法学主题发展阶段的主要要素来解决回答这个问题的挑战。考虑到其范围和复杂性,我们无意穷尽这一主题,我们试图将“诉诸司法”置于当代场景中,并提出通常归因于它的方法,为正确理解提供必要的方法论和术语澄清。在这方面,考虑了被分类为法律-程序和民主-体制的观点,以及包括在诉诸司法(lato sensu)、诉诸司法和诉诸权利范围内的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ACCESS TO JUSTICE
What should be understood, contemporaneously, by Access to Justice? This paper addresses the challenge of answering this question by describing the main elements that portray the stage of development of the theme in Legal Science. With no pretension to exhaust the subject, considering its scope and complexity, we seek to situate Access to Justice in the contemporary scene and present the approaches commonly attributed to it, providing the methodological and terminological clarifications necessary for a proper understanding. In this context, considerations are made about perspectives classified as legal-procedural and democratic-institutional, as well as the conceptions, included in the universe of Access to Justice (lato sensu), Access to the Judiciary and Access to Rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
QUEENS OF HOPE AND DEVOTION I RISCHI DI UNA REGOLAMENTAZIONE DEL FENOMENO “FAKE NEWS”. ALCUNI ESEMPI EUROPEI MULHERES NO OCUPE ESTELITA ALGORITMOS E INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL KELSEN E A METAÉTICA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1